[vchkpw] vpopmail and drbd

2005-04-19 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Hello i'm testing a configuration of qmail+vpopmail+drbd+heartbeat on two servers, master and slave. My intentions are to share with drbd the home of vpopmail, /var/qmail/users and /var/qmail/control, for setting up the slave server in case of down of the primary server. Nobody has experiences

[vchkpw] vpopmail with drbd / intermezzo

2003-11-24 Thread TuxRelated
Hi List, our current qmail/vpopmail server gets a little unstable due to some raid problems, so i want to setup a 2-node failover cluster with qmail, vpopmail and imap. the plan is to use drbd to mirror /home via tcp/ip to the second node and to use heartbeat to do a failover if the primary

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail with drbd / intermezzo

2003-11-24 Thread Nick Harring
Erik Bourget wrote: TuxRelated [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi List, our current qmail/vpopmail server gets a little unstable due to some raid problems, so i want to setup a 2-node failover cluster with qmail, vpopmail and imap. the plan is to use drbd to mirror /home via tcp/ip to

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail with drbd / intermezzo

2003-11-24 Thread TuxRelated
Monday, November 24, 2003, 5:44:49 PM, Nick wrote: NH I whole heartedly agree. Intermezzo looks and feels like a research FS, NH which its pretty darn good for. Its not a production FS at this point. ACK - but i hope drbd is better NH This is a little nappy if you're going to try and cluster

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail with drbd / intermezzo

2003-11-24 Thread TuxRelated
Monday, November 24, 2003, 5:30:05 PM, Erik wrote: EB You're over-engineering. DRDB and Intermezzo are not ready for this. Try to EB imagine recovering from a failure in either of these. ok, intermezzo really seems to be not ready for production, but drbd makes a pretty stable impression on me.