Re: [vchkpw] new quota support question

2003-03-07 Thread Brian Kolaci
OK OK. Brian had me thinking that the quota was stored in a database with all of that talk about pw_shell and limits API calls. I now see that (as I originally thought), the quota is actually stored in the 'maildirsize' file. (I opened it up and looked at it in my maildir) It is

[vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

2003-03-07 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hello, I've added support for SpamAssassin into vdelivermail (basically, it will just add the SpamAssassin score of the mail if activated and NEVER delete mail on the server). Further, I added the -w switch to vmodinfo which has it display all users in a domain, handy if you want to just know

Re: [vchkpw] new quota support question

2003-03-07 Thread Jesse Guardiani
On Friday 07 March 2003 08:01, Brian Kolaci wrote: OK OK. Brian had me thinking that the quota was stored in a database with all of that talk about pw_shell and limits API calls. I now see that (as I originally thought), the quota is actually stored in the 'maildirsize' file.

[vchkpw] Setting unlimited quota with vsetuserquota? How?

2003-03-07 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hello, this might seem stupid, but how am I supposed to set unlimited quota for single users with vsetuserquota? Intuitively, I'd have expect 0 or -1 but both seem to yield in a 0 quota, i.e. account has 100% used space even with only one mail in there. I'd appreciate any clarification on this

[vchkpw] 5.3.18 vpopbull -V

2003-03-07 Thread Rick Romero
A bit of a scare/nuisance, if you use -V , the username gets printed twice. eg: vpopbull -V -f filename domain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] It looks like it's been sent twice. -n -V only prints the domain once. This patch adds some extra text

Re: [vchkpw] new quota support question

2003-03-07 Thread Jesse Guardiani
On Friday 07 March 2003 09:47, Jesse Guardiani wrote: On Friday 07 March 2003 08:01, Brian Kolaci wrote: Hang on. I think I just realized what I've been missing the entire time: The USER QUOTAS still work! That means that maildrop and courier still enforce them. But when you create a domain,

Re: [vchkpw] new quota support question

2003-03-07 Thread Jesse Guardiani
On Friday 07 March 2003 10:13, Jesse Guardiani wrote: On Friday 07 March 2003 09:47, Jesse Guardiani wrote: On Friday 07 March 2003 08:01, Brian Kolaci wrote: Hang on. I think I just realized what I've been missing the entire time: The USER QUOTAS still work! That means that maildrop and

Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.18 vpopbull -V

2003-03-07 Thread Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM \(R\)
Hi Rick, sorry for that silly question. What does vpopbull do? Oliver Etzel A bit of a scare/nuisance, if you use -V , the username gets printed twice. eg: vpopbull -V -f filename domain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] It looks like

Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.18 vpopbull -V

2003-03-07 Thread Rick Romero
It basically sends an email to everyone in a domain. Kind of like Vpop Bulletin. It's great for sending notifications to all users. Rick On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 09:20, Oliver Etzel - GoodnGo.COM (R) wrote: Hi Rick, sorry for that silly question. What does vpopbull do? Oliver Etzel

RE: [vchkpw] Setting unlimited quota with vsetuserquota? How?

2003-03-07 Thread Clayton Weise
Set the quota to NOQUOTA -Original Message- From: Gabriel Ambuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 6:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [vchkpw] Setting unlimited quota with vsetuserquota? How? Hello, this might seem stupid, but how am I supposed to set

Re[2]: [vchkpw] Setting unlimited quota with vsetuserquota? How?

2003-03-07 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Clayton, Friday, March 7, 2003, 4:44:07 PM, you wrote: Set the quota to NOQUOTA Thanks. That should probably get into usage of vsetuserquota, I guess... Best regards, Gabriel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.0.2i

Re[6]: [vchkpw] Setting unlimited quota with vsetuserquota? How?

2003-03-07 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Clayton, Friday, March 7, 2003, 5:01:31 PM, you wrote: Yeah.. I agree that it should be in the usage for it, it would make sense since it's not a numerical value so nobody would logically guess it. I'll patch that the next time I fiddle with the

[vchkpw] Re: domain problem

2003-03-07 Thread jake
Thanks for the great help. I am now able to receive mail and check it with sqwebmail. I do still notice one thing. When I first installed on the new box, vpopmail user and group was #97. It was #89 on the first box so I changed it to #89 on the new box after noticing problems. Now I have

RE: [vchkpw] Re: domain problem

2003-03-07 Thread Clayton Weise
Typically when people recompile vpopmail they do it by running a make clean or make distclean in the source directory and reconfiguring it. I've found this to be just a tad unreliable and I usually erase the source dir, and untar a fresh batch of source to make my new build. This usually

[vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.19

2003-03-07 Thread Kari Suomela
Thursday March 06 2003 21:23, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote to All: Complaining? Just asking a question. Not an unreasonable wish, either! AK You come across as if you're entitled to the feature in this AK release. Everyone's entitled to their opinion - as long they keep it to themselves. I

Re: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

2003-03-07 Thread Bill Shupp
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 06:33 AM, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: Hello, I've added support for SpamAssassin into vdelivermail (basically, it will just add the SpamAssassin score of the mail if activated and NEVER delete mail on the server). Further, I added the -w switch to vmodinfo which has it

Re: [vchkpw] 5.3.18 vpopbull -V

2003-03-07 Thread Bill Shupp
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 07:10 AM, Rick Romero wrote: A bit of a scare/nuisance, if you use -V , the username gets printed twice. eg: vpopbull -V -f filename domain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] It looks like it's been sent twice. -n -V only

Re: [vchkpw] new quota support question

2003-03-07 Thread Bill Shupp
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 07:15 AM, Jesse Guardiani wrote: So, Bill, why don't you think Ken might not sign off on this? Because I can't read his mind. I put together what I think is appropriate. That doesn't mean he will agree. Since he was the one to implement vadddomain -u to support

Re: [vchkpw] new quota support question

2003-03-07 Thread Jesse Guardiani
On Friday 07 March 2003 12:29, Bill Shupp wrote: On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 07:15 AM, Jesse Guardiani wrote: So, Bill, why don't you think Ken might not sign off on this? Because I can't read his mind. I put together what I think is appropriate. That doesn't mean he will agree. Since

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.19

2003-03-07 Thread Bill Shupp
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 08:44 AM, Kari Suomela wrote: Everyone's entitled to their opinion - as long they keep it to themselves. I posted the same question a long time ago. Can't recall the answer, but somehow understood that it might be implemented in a subsequent version. I still think

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.19

2003-03-07 Thread Jesse Guardiani
On Friday 07 March 2003 11:44, Kari Suomela wrote: Thursday March 06 2003 21:23, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote to All: Complaining? Just asking a question. Not an unreasonable wish, either! AK You come across as if you're entitled to the feature in this AK release. Everyone's entitled to

[vchkpw] Re: domain problem

2003-03-07 Thread jake
That did it! Thanks again for the assistance. Sqwebmail was broken after that so I did the same thing to it and now it works great. I still see one problem, when I do 'qmailctl stat' it show pop3d up for 0 or 1 second. I can't see any log entries that would point to why. The qmail handbook

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.19

2003-03-07 Thread Steve Fulton
At 13:03 07/03/2003 -0500, you wrote: SF Define user expiry for me, I'm curious as to what you mean. I will, if you post to the list. I had assumed you had, but I had missed it. I'm not be confrontational, I'm simply curious if you're referring to a system where I clients e-mail account or

RE: [vchkpw] change the default-domain

2003-03-07 Thread Clayton Weise
As noted just a few minutes ago in a previous email on a different topic. Erase your source and start with a fresh batch, that should alleviate the problem. -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: [vchkpw] Re: domain problem

2003-03-07 Thread Clayton Weise
Well.. for one thing, I've never seen qmail-pop3d used with the -x option, so I'm not sure how tcpserver handles that. I can't say for sure whether it would work or not. One thing is simply to try and run that script as-is and see what errors you get (if any). Also, check your pop3d log files

[vchkpw] Re: domain problem

2003-03-07 Thread jake
Nothing in the pop3d log since 3/4, when this all started. If I just run the 'run' script it starts supervising pop3d, but it still only runs 1 sec at max. netstat -p -l shows nothing on port 110. The -x option to tcpserver is straight from Dave Sill's script that he sends with The Qmail

Re: [vchkpw] Re: domain problem

2003-03-07 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED], On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 12:36:27 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nothing in the pop3d log since 3/4, when this all started. If I just run the 'run' script it starts supervising pop3d, but it still only runs 1 sec Do a 'svc -d /path/to/pop3d_startup' and execute the

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.19

2003-03-07 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
I still think user expiry is one of the 'must-have' features. Personally I don't think it belongs in vpopmail. A shell script that runs once a week/month that queries the database for users older than x and runs vdeluser $user would be stupid-simple to implement. Unless you are asking for

[vchkpw] Re: domain problem

2003-03-07 Thread jake
If I do svc -d /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d then run the run script from a shell, the thing works. I can hit the pop server no problem. If I stop that shell and do svc -u /service/qmail-pop3d, qmailctl stat still shows it up for 0 or 1 second. If I do ps -ef | grep pop I see the errors

Re[2]: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

2003-03-07 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hi Bill Shupp, you wrote. BS On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 06:33 AM, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: Hello, I've added support for SpamAssassin into vdelivermail (basically, it will just add the SpamAssassin score of the mail if activated and NEVER delete mail on the server). Further, I added the

Re: Re[4]: [vchkpw] SpamAssassin/vmodinfo changes

2003-03-07 Thread Dave Weiner
Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Dave, Hi Gabriel. No need to CC me, I get the list email just as fast :) Friday, March 7, 2003, 9:09:17 PM, you wrote: The lack of being able to turn it off per user is probably the only thing that holds me back from using

Re: [vchkpw] tcp.smtp file perms/owns for -enable-roaming-users?

2003-03-07 Thread Jonas Pasche
Hi Ben, Apologies if this is already answered elsewhere -- I didn't see it. What should the file permissions and ownership be for the tcprules tcp.smtp file in order to enable vpopmail pop-before-smtp roaming user support? In other words, for qmail/vpopmail to temporarily add an IP address

Re: [vchkpw] Problem....

2003-03-07 Thread Jonas Pasche
Hi Bill, Unfortunately it is in the file rcpthosts. Any other ideas ?? Yes - please provide proper error reports. In your case, at least the full target address, the output of qmail-showctl, and the full error message. No part of qmail says exactly relay denied, so please be specific, or we

[vchkpw] vchkpw core dumps

2003-03-07 Thread Jim
Hi all, I have set up vpopmail 5.3.16 over qmail 1.03 on solaris 2.7 sparc. I'm running qmail + pop + smtp out of daemontools with tcpserver, similar to LWQ. I have patched tcpserver with André Oppermann's SSL/TLS patch. qmail has been patched with: ext_todo-20030105 smtpd-auth-0.31

[vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.19

2003-03-07 Thread Kari Suomela
Friday March 07 2003 09:33, Bill Shupp wrote to All: I still think user expiry is one of the 'must-have' features. BS Then by all means, submit a patch and I'll be happy to test it. If I knew how, I would have done it ages ago. KS KARICO Business Services Toronto, ON Canada

[vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.19

2003-03-07 Thread Kari Suomela
Friday March 07 2003 13:39, Steve Fulton wrote to Kari Suomela: SF Define user expiry for me, I'm curious as to what you mean. SF confrontational, I'm simply curious if you're referring to a SF system SF where I clients e-mail account or domains expire at a certain SF date, or SF

Re: [vchkpw] tcp.smtp file perms/owns for -enable-roaming-users?

2003-03-07 Thread Jesse Guardiani
On Friday 07 March 2003 19:55, Benjamin Tomhave wrote: His ~vpopmail/etc/open-smtp a file I should have manually created at some point in time (touch open-smtp)? It does not currently exist, and probably explains why the pop-before-smtp has never functioned. I'm going to assume this

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail 5.3.19

2003-03-07 Thread Dalmata
KS, Maybe you could hire someone to do it for you. Open Source needs any resource from anybody. It's not an endless fountain of resources for you to get money. Solidarity is key in the whole Open Source system. Jordi Roca - Original Message - From: Kari Suomela To: