Hi all,
I can't seem to understand why this msg isn't coming into the mailbox I made
for testing that is now over 90% and standing on 93%.
Can anyone give me a hand in figuring this out?
Cheers,
Shai
My /var/mail/vpopmail file is still growing... :-(
Is there someone on the list that understand what's going wrong?
What does your /var/qmail/rc file look like?
My qmail/rc file looks like this:
===START===
#!/bin/sh
# Using stdout for logging
# Using control/defaultdelivery from qmail-local
yes it does hv Maildir under
/home/vpopmail/domains/ojoobala.com/balaji
the permissions are vpopmail/vchkpw. Maildir has the
following dir cur, new and tmp. it also contains sqweb
configuration details. All the directories hv 700.
i feel vpop is looking for Maildir under
/home/balaji/Maildir but
If you type vdominfo ojoobala.com what output does it
show for dir?
-Original Message-
From: Balaji NJL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2003 11:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and
domain issues
I tried to email Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this, but efilter on
their server blocked my message.
Ken, if you get this, please unsub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, September 8, 2003, at 06:43 PM, Chris Pugh wrote:
Looks like I was right after all about those messages
Shane .. still coming
On Monday, September 8, 2003, at 09:02 PM, mc 02 wrote:
Ive download vpopmail-5.3.26.tar.gz. I am trying to compile it on
FreeBSD 4.8-R and i get the following error:
There's an updated Makefile for 5.3.26 on SourceForge, along with the
5.3.27 release which corrects those problems (among
Just so everyone knows. Tom Collins is attempting
to fork the vpopmail project. He refuses to let me
share ownership of the vpopmail and qmailadmin
projects on source forge. When I asked him to
add me as an owner on the project he said he
refuses now and at any time in the future to
allow me to
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 10:07 AM, Ken Jones wrote:
Just so everyone knows. Tom Collins is attempting
to fork the vpopmail project. He refuses to let me
share ownership of the vpopmail and qmailadmin
projects on source forge. When I asked him to
add me as an owner on the project he said
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 19:30, Tom Collins wrote:
I have forked ownership since I felt that Inter7 was doing a poor job
of maintaining vpopmail and qmailadmin. I readily acknowledge that Ken
created vpopmail and qmailadmin. They're GPL projects, so I'm free to
fork them if I like.
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 12:30, Tom Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 10:07 AM, Ken Jones wrote:
Just so everyone knows. Tom Collins is attempting
to fork the vpopmail project. He refuses to let me
share ownership of the vpopmail and qmailadmin
projects on source forge. When
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 19:51, Rick Romero wrote:
Ken Jones hasn't contributed to vpopmail and qmailadmin development
since March. We've had 12 qmailadmin releases and 7 vpopmail releases
since then. Managing the projects on SourceForge keeps everything out
in the open, and allows
Rick Romero wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 12:30, Tom Collins wrote:
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 10:07 AM, Ken Jones wrote:
Just so everyone knows. Tom Collins is attempting
to fork the vpopmail project. He refuses to let me
share ownership of the vpopmail and
My only two points:
1) *IF* there is a fork, with two codebases, follow the others'
suggestions and name the new fork differently so that we can have sane
discussions about which program we are dealing with on any given matter.
2) *IF* there is a fork, and for either fork, manage releases and
At 09/09/03 09/09/03 -0700, Tom Collins wrote:
Ken Jones hasn't contributed to vpopmail and qmailadmin development since
March. We've had 12 qmailadmin releases and 7 vpopmail releases since
then. Managing the projects on SourceForge keeps everything out in the
open, and allows anyone to
Hi,
How I setup a limit for message size in qmail??
Thanks,
Marlon
put the size in bytes into /var/qmail/control/databytes
Shane
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Cabrera Oliveira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2003 2:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] Message Size
Hi,
How I setup a limit for message size in
At 11:22 AM 9/9/2003, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 09/09/03 09/09/03 -0700, Tom Collins wrote:
Ken Jones hasn't contributed to vpopmail and qmailadmin development since
March. We've had 12 qmailadmin releases and 7 vpopmail releases since
then. Managing the projects on SourceForge keeps
Hi,
I get an error when I send out msgs to the mailing lists... but I wonder if
you guys knew what they mean. This is a test mail just to get the msg, and
then, if you even get this msg, I'll add the reply emails I get from a
server I know nothing about...
Shai
Hi Chris,
I don't know what you mean but this virus warning.. but the errors I get are
not exactly errors. They are two emails that come back to me every time I
send to either list on vpopmail, sqwebmail or courier-IMAP mailing lists.
emails described below:
1. Subject: failure notice
Downsized
In an attempt to articulate the misgivings of the current politics on
the vchkpw mailing list, Inter7 has prepared the following issues for
your consideration:
1. Since moving the projects to SourceForge, we've kept up with
submitted patches and bug reports. I feel that making the move was
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Tom Collins wrote:
I have forked ownership since I felt that Inter7 was doing a poor job
of maintaining vpopmail and qmailadmin. I readily acknowledge that Ken
created vpopmail and qmailadmin. They're GPL projects, so I'm free to
fork them if I like. Since moving the
I belive what you are seeing is reply from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Each time I
send a message to this list, I get a reply from him/She that contain a
viruse. So Far, my antiviruse did its jobs, but the problem is still there.
- Original Message -
From: Shai Ben-Naphtali [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
ahem. this is not a good response, very, very disappointing. comments below.
At 12:44 PM 9/9/2003, Ms. Catherine Kouzmanoff wrote:
2. I'm certainly not doing this to be malicious or to hurt Ken and
Inter7, Tom Collins.
This is irrelevant and to mention so implies that your intentions may be
tisdagen den 9 september 2003 21.44 skrev Ms. Catherine Kouzmanoff:
For seven years, Inter7 has been the original and primary development
source for vpopmail, qmailadmin, vQadmin, eps, vQregister, DNSadmin,
Incorrect, let me remind you vpopmail itself is a fork off of the work by
Chris
Ms. Catherine Kouzmanoff wrote:
In an attempt to articulate the misgivings of the current politics on
the vchkpw mailing list, Inter7 has prepared the following issues for
your consideration:
1. Since moving the projects to SourceForge, we've kept up with
submitted patches and bug reports. I
Hello all,
I figured I'd throw in my 2 cents on the matter. Please note, I'm not a
programmer and do not claim to be one. My views are purely from the
standpoint of someone who has been using vpopmail happily for a couple
of years now. It is one of the first open source software packages I
had
It seems that someone is subscribing this list to a number of improper
addresses to disrupt things...
-an address that responds back to posts with a virus
-various abuse@ and postmaster@ addresses
Could whomever maintains this list have a look at the subscription list
and pull some of the more
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 4:14 pm, Oden Eriksson wrote:
tisdagen den 9 september 2003 21.44 skrev Ms. Catherine Kouzmanoff:
For seven years, Inter7 has been the original and primary development
source for vpopmail, qmailadmin, vQadmin, eps, vQregister, DNSadmin,
Incorrect, let me remind
Inter7 remains supportive of all efforts to enhance the development
process. However, we cannot publicly back the development efforts of
Tom Collins' work without administrative privileges on SourceForge. It
is a time to call together everyone on this list to insist that Tom
Collins add Ken
At 02:46 PM 9/9/2003, Ken Jones wrote:
In the same spirit of community and co-operation, Bill Shupp
took over primary development for quite some time. Our
last combined release was in April.
How has what Tom has done been any different, up to the conflict that's
recently come to light? Since you
Nick, I apologize for the misunderstanding. I was not replying to you
personally or attempting to answer any questions you may have.
Furthermore, I'm afraid that you may have missed the point: we want to
support Tom Collins on SourceForge.
Regards,
Catherine
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 03:18 PM, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
a question for tom, if ken does participate as a developer, and
contributes in a manner representative of a lead developer, at a later
time would you consider adding him as an administrator?
Definitely. Up until now, I
Good afternoon Paul,
I'm afraid you too may have taken this personally.
I choose my grammatically inferred semantics wisey. Remember, may, is
only a possibility.
I understand your email as a misunderstanding to the position Inter7 is
taking: we want to be able to support Tom Collins.
Rejoice
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I belive what you are seeing is reply from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Each time I send a message to
this list, I get a reply from him/She ...
Virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the culprit. There are many
different messages flying abut, not just this one.
If you to this
Hey,
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 01:26, Oden Eriksson wrote:
If you want to check in old stuff for historical reasons or whatever, I think
I have at least 80% of all the releases at my site, it's at:
http://www.deserve-it.com/sw/src/
Thanks man! You're a lifesaver! I just used almost an two hours
I'm afraid you too may have taken this personally.
I choose my grammatically inferred semantics wisey.
Remember, may, is only a possibility.
This all seems to be getting very heated and personal.
As a relative newcomer to this list,
care to enlighten me as what all the fuss is
about? And
tisdagen den 9 september 2003 23.46 skrev Ken Jones:
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 4:14 pm, Oden Eriksson wrote:
tisdagen den 9 september 2003 21.44 skrev Ms. Catherine Kouzmanoff:
For seven years, Inter7 has been the original and primary development
source for vpopmail, qmailadmin,
Hi,
Given that control/virtualdomains allows one to accept wildcard
subdomains i.e. .domain.com:alias-virtualdomains
What I'm looking for is to allow mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] be
sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i.e. for the user (local)
to be [EMAIL PROTECTED], so that mail sent to [EMAIL
Ken and Inter7 deserve credit for all the work they have put
into vpopmail and the associated admin packages.
Sourceforge is a great place for hosting open source software.
The tracker system allows bugs, patches, feature requests etc
to be handled in an orderly fashion.
Tom deserves credit
onsdagen den 10 september 2003 00.34 skrev Tom Collins:
[...]
I have been learning about CVS today, and will have a CVS repository of
the current versions of vpopmail and qmailadmin available within the
next 24 hours. I want to make sure I have a full understanding of how
CVS works so I can
Wow, this list is beginning to look like the qmail list.
Why is there so much pointless arguing and disagreement over something
as simple as giving Inter7 admin access to the project on SourceForge?
I don't know the staff @ Inter7 personally, but I am sure they would
never do anything to hurt the
I completely agree with every syllable. I would also love for this
thread to end.
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: Michael Bowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:35 PM
To: vpopmail list
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Re: Tom's fork of vpopmail (and qmailadmin)
On Tuesday 09 September 2003 6:35 pm, Michael Bowe wrote:
Ken and Inter7 deserve credit for all the work they have put
into vpopmail and the associated admin packages.
Sourceforge is a great place for hosting open source software.
The tracker system allows bugs, patches, feature requests etc
At 03:37 PM 9/9/2003, Ms. Catherine Kouzmanoff wrote:
Good afternoon Paul,
I'm afraid you too may have taken this personally.
I choose my grammatically inferred semantics wisey. Remember, may, is only
a possibility.
well, we can play wisey word games all day. You *may* be a controlling
while we're on the subject of inter7 abandoning the software, shall we
discuss inter7's abandonment of administration of the mailing list too?
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:10:19 -0700
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Hi,
I am using vpopmail-5.2.1, courier-imap-2.0, qmail-1.03. I use both courier-
imapd and courier-pop3d instead of qmail-pop3d.
A few days after I migrated my users from an old mail server to my new nfs
server, users started getting weird quota reulsts on the webmail quota.
vuserinfo reported
Hi,
This is in regards to SMTP-AUTH and an interesting bug which is creeping
up somewhere.
We had a customer who recently had a username of webmaster and a password
of webmaster00. From the standard pop3 authentication, there was no issue
with this username and password. For some reason,
Hi all,
I made /home/vpopmail/domains/.quotawarn.msg
I placed this inside:
From: Mail Delivery System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Valued Customer:;
Subject: Mail quota warning
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 08:40 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
Looking just below, the SPAMmer who made use of this, used the same
username and password. I then tried the base64 password for their
'webmaster00' password and that [d2VibWFzdGVyMDA=] works as well. I
then tried truncating their
I am getting weird messages from some of the subscribers on vchkpw list when I
post to the list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Below are two examples.
- Forwarded message from Gail Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:47:51 -0700
From: Gail Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
vpopmail is coded so only 1 quotawarning is sent in any 24 hour period
If you are trying to do some testing, you can clear the 24 hour counter by
deleting the quotawarn file from the user's dir
Michael.
- Original Message -
From: Shai Ben-Naphtali [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
This is very annoying. Moderators?
This is yet another automated message I get when I post to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
**MESSAGE FROM THE TPC.INT SINKHOLE**
We regret to inform you that the phone number you attempted
to reach is not currently being
yes, I realize this, I'm going to take care of it in the morning.
-Jeremy
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 23:40, Tim Hasson wrote:
This is very annoying. Moderators?
This is yet another automated message I get when I post to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
**MESSAGE FROM
At 09:24 PM 9/9/2003, Tom Collins wrote:
Are you using MD5 passwords (go to your vpopmail source directory and
`grep MD5 config.h`)? If not, I think crypt() only uses the first 8
characters of the password. I'm not sure what the limit is if you're
using MD5.
Tom...
Doesn't the AUTH LOGIN
I apologize for sending a copy directly to you Anthony, reply button in
evolution is a little crazy sometimes :)
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 00:06, Anthony Baratta wrote:
Tom...
Doesn't the AUTH LOGIN state that he's going to use Base64 encoding?? If he
put in AUTH CRAM-MD5 then it would be
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 10:06 PM, Anthony Baratta wrote:
Doesn't the AUTH LOGIN state that he's going to use Base64 encoding??
If he put in AUTH CRAM-MD5 then it would be expecting MD5 encoding.
So this appears to be a problem with LOGIN, either in the patch or
with vPopmail.
When
At 10:10 PM 9/9/2003, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
the smtp-auth patch you are probably using wrongly advertises that it
can handle CRAM-MD5. Simply edit qmail-smtpd.c, search for the
CRAM-MD5, remove it, rebuild qmail-smtpd, and you're set. I just did
this today, and it worked fine.
This brings up a
Hi,
Im using vpopmail-5.3.27 + courier-imap + qmail. In vpopmail the default
domain is chaein.com We have a new domain cyberchaein.com. What i did was
using vipmap to map 192.168.1.15 to cyberchaein.com so it looks like this
when i run ./vipmap -p:
192.168.1.15 cyberchaein.com
but i still
58 matches
Mail list logo
