On 16.02.2013 11:43, Joachim Wilke wrote:
2013/2/15 Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@tvdr.de:
I'm not planning to make any more changes to the Makefiles for version
2.0.0.
So it will remain broken. Thats sad, I provided the patch already
before release of 1.7.37.
Well, according to
On 15.02.2013 21:53, Bernard Jaulin wrote:
Klaus,
An error has crept into the last po file line 758 (maybe my new po editor)
If I make a diff between your latest file and the one I have here I get:
--- po/fr_FR.po 2013/02/15 14:42:17 2.44
+++ po/fr_FR.po 2013/02/16 10:54:16
@@ -10,15
Been sitting on this for ages but in anticipation of 2.0:
--- PLUGINS/src/dvbhddevice/Makefile.orig
+++ PLUGINS/src/dvbhddevice/Makefile
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
$(SOFILE): $(OBJS) libhdffcmd
@$(MAKE) --no-print-directory -C libhdffcmd all
- $(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -shared $(OBJS)
On 16.02.2013 13:15, Chris Mayo wrote:
Been sitting on this for ages but in anticipation of 2.0:
--- PLUGINS/src/dvbhddevice/Makefile.orig
+++ PLUGINS/src/dvbhddevice/Makefile
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
$(SOFILE): $(OBJS) libhdffcmd
@$(MAKE) --no-print-directory -C libhdffcmd all
-
Copy that Klaus !
Here is the good one.
Bernard.
2013/2/16 Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@tvdr.de
On 15.02.2013 21:53, Bernard Jaulin wrote:
Klaus,
An error has crept into the last po file line 758 (maybe my new po editor)
If I make a diff between your latest file and the one I
Am 16.02.13 14:09, schrieb th_zieg...@gmx.de:
Any other hints regarding what USB DVB-S receiver, sat-dish, etc.
works well is also welcome.
as sat-dish I can recommend kathrein (90cm) with kathrein LNB. Is maybe
more expensive than other companies, but you get the quality you pay. As
Hi!
Now that I have a spare DVB-S2 tuner (TechniSat SkyStar USB HD
(adapter2); the others on this box are atm Hauppauge Nova-TD model
1172 (adapter 0+1) and TechnoTrend S2-3600 (adapter3) - all USB) I
decided to play with vdr device bonding. I discovered three things:
(still using vdr 1.7.29, I
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:09 AM, th_zieg...@gmx.de wrote:
Are there any VDR-compatible (I'm using e-tobi 1.7.29) HD test clips,
available somewhere on the net or can s.o. provide one?
There are many places hosting HD test clips. You can look at:
Am 16.02.2013 17:14, schrieb VDR User:
If you want the highest quality deinterlacing on 1080i, a GT220 is
required.
A GT610 is good enough, costs only the half and it is much easier to
cool it quietly.
Gerald
!DSPAM:511fb59841991258417478!
___
Makes it clearer that it's a Makefile snippet, distinguishes from VDR
conf files. Reposted here per Klaus' request, he'd like to see 3
people ack this.
---
Make.config.template | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Make.config.template b/Make.config.template
index
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 08:14:33AM -0800, VDR User wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:09 AM, th_zieg...@gmx.de wrote:
Are there any VDR-compatible (I'm using e-tobi 1.7.29) HD test clips,
available somewhere on the net or can s.o. provide one?
There are many places hosting HD test clips.
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Gerald Dachs v...@dachsweb.de wrote:
If you want the highest quality deinterlacing on 1080i, a GT220 is
required.
A GT610 is good enough, costs only the half and it is much easier to cool it
quietly.
I've read the opposite -- that the GT610 struggle with
Am 16.02.2013 21:28, schrieb VDR User:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Gerald Dachs v...@dachsweb.de wrote:
If you want the highest quality deinterlacing on 1080i, a GT220 is
required.
A GT610 is good enough, costs only the half and it is much easier to cool it
quietly.
I've read the
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Gerald Dachs v...@dachsweb.de wrote:
If you want the highest quality deinterlacing on 1080i, a GT220 is
required.
A GT610 is good enough, costs only the half and it is much easier to cool
it
quietly.
I've read the opposite -- that the GT610 struggle with
14 matches
Mail list logo
