On 03/02/2023 10:36, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 02.02.23 23:47, patrick9...@free.fr wrote:
On 02/02/2023 23:27, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 02.02.23 23:16, Patrick Lerda wrote:
Beside preventing crashes with vdr-2.6.3 this is required to
get vdr to work properly with the gcc thread
On 06.02.23 21:11, Patrick Lerda wrote:
On 03/02/2023 10:36, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 02.02.23 23:47, patrick9...@free.fr wrote:
On 02/02/2023 23:27, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 02.02.23 23:16, Patrick Lerda wrote:
Beside preventing crashes with vdr-2.6.3 this is required to
get vdr to
On 06.02.23 23:29, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
It is supposed to be shared by *exactly* two threads.
One only writing 'head', the other only writing 'tail'.
Two-ended buffers are pretty good when used correctly, but nowadays they
have a small chance of triggering memory ordering issues, where it
Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 12:54:16AM +0100, Udo Richter wrote:
Two-ended buffers are pretty good when used correctly, but nowadays
they have a small chance of triggering memory ordering issues, where it
is possible that written data to the buffer is still stuck in a distant
cache, while the updated
