Hi,
I recently worked on xmltv2vdr.pl (version 1.0.6) and checked why it
was so slow on my mighty Celeron 233. So I modified it a little to
avoid reading all the xmltv file for each channel defined in the
channels.conf. The result is good : I can process my 5Mo xmltv file in
less than 10 minutes
On 2/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently worked on xmltv2vdr.pl (version 1.0.6) and checked
why it was so slow on my mighty Celeron 233. So I modified it
a little to avoid reading all the xmltv file for each channel
defined in the channels.conf. The result is good :
On 2/13/07, Morfsta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm the original author of xml2vdr (for my sins!), thanks for working on it
and improving the performance.
I know and thanks for it.
If everyone is happy with this new code release and it really improves the
speed I'll wrap it up and make a
On 2/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it didn't help at all with my benchmark.
...
For information that change has no impact on my bench.
Interesting, what version of Perl are you running if those
changes don't do anything?
vdr26:~/xmltv# time ./xmltv2vdrv5.pl -s -c
On 4/11/07, Simon Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm now getting my xml EPG from a different source, and am having problems
getting the perl script to run properly. My perl knowledge is poor (to
say the least!!)
The problem is, the epg xml I'm getting has the channel= at the wrong
end
On Feb 3, 2008 11:17 AM, Klaus Schmidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, here's the straw poll:
Should there be a stable version 1.6.0 now, based on what's in
version 1.5.14, but without DVB-S2 or even H.264 support?
Yes or No?
In my opinion, Yes (a stable release never hurts).
