Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] AudioIndexer.patch for VDR-1.5.10 provides correct length for new radio recordings

2007-10-25 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, the attached patch is for VDR-1.4.7. Bye. -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -Nurp ../vdr-1.4.7-orig/remux.c ./remux.c --- ../vdr-1.4.7-orig/remux.c 2006-12-01 15:46:25.0 +0100 +++ ./remux.c 2007-10-25 13:22:55.0 +0200 @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] AudioIndexer.patch for VDR-1.5.10 provides correct length for new radio recordings

2007-10-25 Thread Halim Sahin
Hi, Thanks Regards Halim ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] AudioIndexer.patch for VDR-1.5.10 provides correct length for new radio recordings

2007-10-25 Thread Stone
When I apply this patch to vdr-1.5.10, VDR no longer starts. Could this new Audio Indexer patch be conflicting with the dynamc ringbuffer patch? Best Regards. ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] AudioIndexer.patch for VDR-1.5.10 provides correct length for new radio recordings

2007-10-25 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, I'm sorry for the trouble but the patches miss a check, whether audioIndexer exists when VDR calls cRemux::Clear(). So VDR may segfault for non radio channels. Attached are updated patches for VDR 1.5.10 and 1.4.7. Bye. -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] AudioIndexer.patch for VDR-1.5.10 provides correct length for new radio recordings

2007-10-25 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Reinhard Nissl schrieb: I'm sorry for the trouble but the patches miss a check, whether audioIndexer exists when VDR calls cRemux::Clear(). So VDR may segfault for non radio channels. Am I blind? audioIndexer was not initialized to NULL for non radio channels. Attached are updated