Re: For each on an object?

Hi Evan, I guess its just a usability thing. To be able to pass a single string would avoid careless errors, that's all. I may settle for what you suggest though. You can make a custom Uberspect to get what you want. :)

RE: For each on an object?

Hmm.. There's a neat idea.. I'll look into that. Thanks! -Evan -Original Message- From: Shinobu Kawai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 3:49 AM To: Velocity Users List Subject: Re: For each on an object? Hi Evan, I guess its just a usability thing

RE: For each on an object?

Hi, Why don't you just assign $things to an array with 1 element instead of just to the string object? If you do this then you definitely shouldn't have problems. Hope this helps, Sayed Ibrahim Hashimi www.cise.ufl.edu/~sih -Original Message- From: e v a n l e o n a r d [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: For each on an object?

List Subject: RE: For each on an object? Hi, Why don't you just assign $things to an array with 1 element instead of just to the string object? If you do this then you definitely shouldn't have problems. Hope this helps, Sayed Ibrahim Hashimi www.cise.ufl.edu/~sih -Original Message- From

RE: For each on an object?

02, 2005 2:14 PM To: 'Velocity Users List' Subject: RE: For each on an object? I guess its just a usability thing. To be able to pass a single string would avoid careless errors, that's all. I may settle for what you suggest though. -Evan -Original Message- From: Sayed Hashimi [mailto

RE: For each on an object?

: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:14 PM To: 'Velocity Users List' Subject: RE: For each on an object? I guess its just a usability thing. To be able to pass a single string would avoid careless errors, that's all. I may settle for what you suggest though. -Evan -Original Message- From: Sayed