Re: [viff-devel] Broken unit tests

2009-07-17 Thread Marcel Keller
Martin Geisler wrote: I'm very confused about what exactly for x in xs[i:] + xs[:i]: ... i = (i + 1) % len(xs) is supposed to do? After x has run through all xs (rotated i steps), then i will have been incremented by len(xs). But you do it mod len(xs) and so i comes out of the loop un

Re: [viff-devel] Broken unit tests

2009-07-17 Thread Martin Geisler
Marcel Keller writes: > Hi Martin, > > Martin Geisler wrote: >> All the tests in the buildbot are currently broken: >> >> http://buildbot.viff.dk/waterfall >> >> It is because of this change of yours: >> >> @@ -164,6 +166,18 @@ >> # the Runtime, since we want everybody to wait until al

Re: [viff-devel] Broken unit tests

2009-07-17 Thread Marcel Keller
Hi Martin, Martin Geisler wrote: All the tests in the buildbot are currently broken: http://buildbot.viff.dk/waterfall It is because of this change of yours: @@ -164,6 +166,18 @@ # the Runtime, since we want everybody to wait until all # runtimes are ready. self.r

[viff-devel] Broken unit tests

2009-07-17 Thread Martin Geisler
Hi Marcel, All the tests in the buildbot are currently broken: http://buildbot.viff.dk/waterfall It is because of this change of yours: @@ -164,6 +166,18 @@ # the Runtime, since we want everybody to wait until all # runtimes are ready. self.runtimes.append(result) +