Re: [viff-devel] Yet another SFDL parser
Mikkel Krøigård m...@cs.au.dk writes: In Amsterdam we were asked about how long it would take, and I didn't have a good answer. Can you try to give a time estimate that we can tell the FairPlay guys? It's kind of hard to tell how long it will take, but I have a gut feeling that says that the basic functionality could be implemented very quickly (a matter of a few days concentrated effort at most), of course excluding the obligatory polishing phase which always takes forever. I can and will do this on the condition that we agree 100% that we don't do things in parallel :) Definitely a good idea :-) However, we talked about this loss of momentum earlier. Up until Christmas, I am still teaching 2 classes and I think it would be a mistake for me to promise anything until January. That sounds very good to me! Since ANTLR doesn't make it easy for us to to handle these int size things, let's just use the parser you made. Okay, good. It also comes with a fairly large set of unit tests, which I found usefull while working with it. I have it as a patch queue here on DAIMI -- you can clone that or convert it to a normal repository and clone that instead. -- Martin Geisler VIFF (Virtual Ideal Functionality Framework) brings easy and efficient SMPC (Secure Multiparty Computation) to Python. See: http://viff.dk/. ___ viff-devel mailing list (http://viff.dk/) viff-devel@viff.dk http://lists.viff.dk/listinfo.cgi/viff-devel-viff.dk
Re: [viff-devel] Yet another SFDL parser
Mikkel Krøigård [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Quoting Martin Geisler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've just sent 22 patches to the viff-patches list: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cryptography.viff.patches/104 They represent yet another attempt at making a SFDL parser. I say yet another since Mikkel and Sigurd has been working on one too, but unfortunately that seems to have lost some momentum. Or at least I haven't heard anything about it recently :-) We haven't lost any momentum on the parser. In fact it has been done for quite a while. We have, however, lost momentum on the rest of the compiler. Right, that was sort of what I meant :-) I don't care which parser is used -- I just played around with it to learn more about Pyparsing. However, regardless of the choice, we should discuss who will commit to take the lead on it. We should have probably talked about that before we made 3 of them. I think we did agree on me, but somehow Sigurd and I ended up doing more or less the same thing concurrently. It would be great if you could go forward with the compiler! In Amsterdam we were asked about how long it would take, and I didn't have a good answer. Can you try to give a time estimate that we can tell the FairPlay guys? -- Martin Geisler VIFF (Virtual Ideal Functionality Framework) brings easy and efficient SMPC (Secure Multiparty Computation) to Python. See: http://viff.dk/. ___ viff-devel mailing list (http://viff.dk/) viff-devel@viff.dk http://lists.viff.dk/listinfo.cgi/viff-devel-viff.dk
