Sorry it took me so long to respond to this Sebastian.
On Thu, May 10, 2007 11:57 am, Sebastian Menge wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 10.05.2007, 10:44 -0500 schrieb Tom Purl:
...
The proposal was not about the layout directly but about separating
formatting from content! So feel free to change
Tom Purl wrote:
Here's what I propose we do:
1. Finalize a tip formatting standard.
2. Use the best available script that supports this standard.
3. Update the best available script if necessary.
4. Revise the standard if necessary.
5. Convert a tips sample.
6. Review the sample and revise the
On Thu, May 10, 2007 3:40 am, John Beckett wrote:
Tom Purl wrote:
Here's what I propose we do:
1. Finalize a tip formatting standard.
2. Use the best available script that supports this standard.
3. Update the best available script if necessary.
4. Revise the standard if necessary.
5.
On Thu, May 10, 2007 10:52 am, Zdenek Sekera wrote:
It would be great if you would consider what I and others have
written, then make a proposal with what you think.
Thanks for the feedback! My proposal is basically what I said
yesterday - that we follow some sort of schedule and make some
Am Donnerstag, den 10.05.2007, 10:44 -0500 schrieb Tom Purl:
did last time: Put a sample tip on a wiki page so we can agree
on its features.
We already have a tip on the page that people have been working on. You
can see the link to it on the following page:
*
Am Donnerstag, den 10.05.2007, 11:40 -0500 schrieb Tom Purl:
For the record, a couple of very knowledgeable people have already done
most of the hard work. For examples, we have a collection of conversion
scripts already:
* http://vimtips.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/scripts/
Doh! -- Seb.
Am Mittwoch 09 Mai 2007 schrieb Gene Kwiecinski:
Now, I have zero idea just how much work is involved in making a wiki,
but if it's enough for one person to do... hey, have at it. Otherwise,
if you end up waiting for a consensus as to which wiki software to use,
which site to use, /ad
Am Donnerstag 10 Mai 2007 schrieb Tom Purl:
We already have a tip on the page that people have been working on. You
can see the link to it on the following page:
* http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Learning_the_vi_editor/Vim/TipsSandbox
Quite nice and I was quite disappointed when it did not
On Tue, May 8, 2007 3:32 pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The main goal now is to get the Vim tips collection back to live. It
has been dead for three months now!
I wasn't aware of this, and it's definitely a problem. Here's what I
propose we do:
1. Finalize a tip formatting standard.
2. Use the
Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2007, 10:33 -0500 schrieb Tom Purl:
I wasn't aware of this, and it's definitely a problem. Here's what I
propose we do:
First, im not sure about what you mean by a) formatting standard and
b) a script that supports the standard
is a) something like a template in
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:37 am, Sebastian Menge wrote:
First, im not sure about what you mean by a) formatting standard and
b) a script that supports the standard
is a) something like a template in mediawiki-speak? see:
http://home.comcast.net/~gerisch/MediaWikiTemplates.html
Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2007, 13:06 -0500 schrieb Tom Purl:
We do have a Wikia site available if we want it
(http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page). I agree with you; it has a lot
of nice features, and may give us a bit more flexibility than the
wikibooks option. I think we should revisit this
Ian Tegebo wrote:
On 5/6/07, Sebastian Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I would like to make another
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:06 -0500, Tom Purl wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:37 am, Sebastian Menge wrote:
First, im not sure about what you mean by a) formatting standard and
b) a script that supports the standard
is a) something like a template in mediawiki-speak? see:
On Tue, May 8, 2007 3:32 pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The main goal now is to get the Vim tips collection back to live. It
has been dead for three months now!
I wasn't aware of this, and it's definitely a problem. Here's what I
propose we do:
1. Finalize a tip formatting standard.
2. Use the
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:37 am, Sebastian Menge wrote:
First, im not sure about what you mean by a) formatting standard and
b) a script that supports the standard
is a) something like a template in mediawiki-speak? see:
http://home.comcast.net/~gerisch/MediaWikiTemplates.html
We do have a Wikia site available if we want it
(http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page). I agree with you; it has a lot
of nice features, and may give us a bit more flexibility than the
wikibooks option. I think we should revisit this topic once we're
ready
to start the real conversion.
No
Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2007, 13:06 -0500 schrieb Tom Purl:
We do have a Wikia site available if we want it
(http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page). I agree with you; it has a lot
of nice features, and may give us a bit more flexibility than the
wikibooks option. I think we should revisit this
Original Message
Subject: RE: VimWiki - again - but with a brand new option
From: Gene Kwiecinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, May 09, 2007 1:35 pm
To: Tom Purl [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vim Mailing List vim@vim.org
[snip]
Yeah, it's a good idea, but there are more important
Yeah, it's a good idea, but there are more important things I have
for
you to do...),
Wow, you had one of those guys too? We just barely got rid of ours a
few
weeks ago. He moved on to greater opportunities. Bright guy, but to
follow his lead, you'd just never get to do anything!
Thankfully, I'm
Ian Tegebo wrote:
On 5/6/07, Sebastian Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I would like to make another
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:06 -0500, Tom Purl wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:37 am, Sebastian Menge wrote:
First, im not sure about what you mean by a) formatting standard and
b) a script that supports the standard
is a) something like a template in mediawiki-speak? see:
Am Montag, den 07.05.2007, 16:07 -0700 schrieb Ian Tegebo:
The Wiki would ideally understand how to link to vim-scripts and vim-tips like
vimonline currently does. As a bonus, mailing-list posts would also linkable
Easy:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interwiki#Shorthand_for_non-wiki_sites
For
Ian Tegebo wrote:
On 5/6/07, Sebastian Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I would like to make another implementation
On 2007-05-08, Ian Tegebo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Tegebo wrote:
I would like to make another implementation independent suggestion;
one could make a VimWiki more valuable by importing the _extremely_
valuable vim helpfiles
On 5/8/07, Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-05-08, Ian Tegebo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Tegebo wrote:
I would like to make another implementation independent suggestion;
one could make a VimWiki more valuable by
Am Montag, den 07.05.2007, 16:07 -0700 schrieb Ian Tegebo:
The Wiki would ideally understand how to link to vim-scripts and vim-tips like
vimonline currently does. As a bonus, mailing-list posts would also linkable
Easy:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interwiki#Shorthand_for_non-wiki_sites
For
Am Dienstag 08 Mai 2007 schrieb Ian Tegebo:
It's fun to dream! I'm serious about getting the helpfiles imported into
the Wiki though. I know about the VimDoc project; I think this could be
the next evolution in that direction.
Well, first one of the administrators of
On 5/8/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Tegebo wrote:
On 5/6/07, Sebastian Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or
On 2007-05-08, Ian Tegebo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Tegebo wrote:
I would like to make another implementation independent suggestion;
one could make a VimWiki more valuable by importing the _extremely_
valuable vim helpfiles
On 5/8/07, Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-05-08, Ian Tegebo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Tegebo wrote:
I would like to make another implementation independent suggestion;
one could make a VimWiki more valuable by
On 5/6/07, Sebastian Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I would like to make another implementation independent suggestion; one
Am Sonntag 06 Mai 2007 schrieb Sebastian Menge:
PS: I would clearly prefer wikia.org over sf.net (I would not build up
upon any beta ...)
The beta officialy ended.
Martin
--
Martin Krischik
mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 5/6/07, Sebastian Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I would like to make another implementation independent suggestion; one
Hello Vim Developers,
Hello Vim Users,
some time ago there was a huge discussion about a Vim-Wiki. In the end
WikiBooks has the highest support. Still some whished for a Vim-only-Wiki
instead of beeing part of a larger project.
For this a new option is not open: SourceForge ended the beta for
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I think it's also important to have some people feeling responsible for
it so if someone doesn't follow the rules, they will
Hello Vim Developers,
Hello Vim Users,
some time ago there was a huge discussion about a Vim-Wiki. In the end
WikiBooks has the highest support. Still some whished for a Vim-only-Wiki
instead of beeing part of a larger project.
For this a new option is not open: SourceForge ended the beta for
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I think it's also important to have some people feeling responsible for
it so if someone doesn't follow the rules, they will
38 matches
Mail list logo
