Denis Perelyubskiy wrote:
in version 7.0.188 (I am on windows xp, us) nothing works when I select
'..' when browsing a directory. has anyone seen this? is this something
peculiar to my installation, a bug, or a feature?
I suspect that you need a recent version of netrw.
To get an
Matthew Winn wrote:
Text editors don't do encryption and never should.
How else would you ensure that you can have encrypted text _without_
the need to temporarily store a plaintext copy of the file?
Pipe the text through to an external encryption tool, such as pgp.
Assuming your
The idea would be to leave the undo list alone, so that when the undo
table gets updated next it'll have a bigger change.
Regards,
Chip Campbell
Hi Stefano Zacchiroli, you wrote:
The solution of being compatible when invoked as 'vi' and being
nocompatible when invoked in a different way made everybody happy. The
(trivial) patch we are using to implement this behaviour is available
at:
Hi Bram Moolenaar, you wrote:
To finish, I'm not suggesting that the optimum one-size-fits-all set
of mappings be determined. Any set of well-planned mappings
would be better than the current blank slate.
The best set of mappings is what you make yourself. That's like: don't
give a
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea would be to leave the undo list alone, so that when the undo
table gets updated next it'll have a bigger change.
What do you mean? From the very short description it sounds like your
describing :undojoin.
nikolai
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea would be to leave the undo list alone, so that when the undo
table gets updated next it'll have a bigger change.
What do you mean? From the very short description it sounds like your
describing
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea would be to leave the undo list alone, so that when the undo
table gets updated next it'll have a bigger change.
What do you mean?
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea would be to leave the undo list alone, so that when the undo
table gets updated next it'll have a bigger
I often want to complete full strings in quotes (foo, 'bla',
`command bla blub`).
But for now, I really need to type all these things again and again. It
would be nice, if I could say fc-x-c- to complete full strings.
Or maybe also c-xc-' for single qouted strings, and c-xc-` for
`-quoted
Martin Stubenschrott wrote:
I often want to complete full strings in quotes (foo, 'bla',
`command bla blub`).
But for now, I really need to type all these things again and again. It
would be nice, if I could say fc-x-c- to complete full strings.
Or maybe also c-xc-' for single qouted strings,
I'd like to see an external .vimrc editor shipping with gVim and
directly accessible from within easy mode (e.g. on the tools menu). The
editor would likely be a totally separate binary though, so maybe a
separate project is called for.
What I have in mind is a tabbed dialog (depending on
Martin Stubenschrott wrote:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 01:12:00AM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Hope that gets added to the default vim 7.1 distribution, because it's
quite the best working omni complete script I have seen so far.
Can you mention on what points cppcomplete.vim works
13 matches
Mail list logo
