Re: Convert2HTML Again

2006-10-12 Thread Edd Barrett
On 12/10/06, Benji Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: span class=bar (text) /span in the body, while the non-CSS version will have something like font color=#EEE bgcolor=333 (text) /font and now the CSS version is easier to read. Yes I see, If i had written this from scratch i

Re: Convert2HTML Again

2006-10-10 Thread Edd Barrett
On 01/10/06, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hope your enjoying your weekend. As promised i have ammended the patch. Hi Guys, I havent recieved any feedback on this patch yet, did anyone get a chance to look at it? Sorry to be a bore. Best Regards Edd

Convert2HTML Again

2006-10-01 Thread Edd Barrett
(Sorry if you recieve this twice, I don't think the first one made it onto the list for whatever reason.) On 26/09/06, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ill add this in as soon as I can, but university work is coming in hard at the moment so it might not be until the weekend. Greetings all

Re: Convert2HTML Again

2006-09-26 Thread Edd Barrett
The suggestion from Benji Fisher to add a variable to allow people to use another font sounds good to me. Make sure it's properly documented, especially about using more than one name and quotes around the name. Great, Ill add this in as soon as I can, but university work is coming in hard

Re: Convert2HTML Again

2006-09-24 Thread Edd Barrett
Does that mean that you are waiting for Bram to give his blessing? Na, just that it's not my decision to make. I'll just do the code. Best Regards Edd

Re: Convert2HTML Again

2006-09-23 Thread Edd Barrett
Hello all, On 23/09/06, George V. Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Edward L. Fox wrote: But we should change one thing before we include this patch into the official version. In the patch file, line 97: +execute normal! A\npre { font-family: courier; color: . s:fgc . ;

Re: Convert2HTML Again

2006-09-23 Thread Edd Barrett
I beg you, please don't hardcode Courier New! Hear, hear! Not only is it the worst possible monospaced screen font, it is also Microsoft specific (in spite of it finding its way onto Tony's Linux box). (Even Microsoft has seen the light, and changed the default monospaced font to Consolas

Re: Convert to HTML patch. Opinions / Testing.

2006-09-15 Thread Edd Barrett
On 15/09/06, Benji Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the decision of whether to include the p tags should be based on principles of logical mark-up: are these naturally paragraphs? This depends upon if you are writing a book or some code. The spacing of the lines should be governed by

Re: Convert to HTML patch. Opinions / Testing.

2006-09-14 Thread Edd Barrett
On 14/09/06, Mikolaj Machowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dnia sobota, 9 września 2006 20:03, Edd Barrett napisał: - I removed p's because you cannot contain a span in a p according to w3. An unstyled p would make no difference in this case anyway. While I agree with most of your changes

Re: Convert to HTML patch. Opinions / Testing.

2006-09-11 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi Benji, You are absolutely correct. This must have slipped past me. I have ammended my patch. New patch is here: http://arameus.net/users/edd/vim-test/2html.vim.diff Thankyou for your support. Best Regards Edd PS, Does anyone know how to disable HTML sending in gmail? Ezalm does not

Convert to HTML patch. Opinions / Testing.

2006-09-09 Thread Edd Barrett
Hello vim-dev, I really liked the Convert to HTML function in gvim, but wished that it could be a little more correct in terms of the w3 standard. So I wrote a patch. Here is an outline of what I have done: - The script used to only declare a !DOCTYPE if CSS was enabled (html_use_css). All