Re: 7.0 administrivia

2006-05-09 Thread Bram Moolenaar
George Reilly wrote: Congratulations on releasing Vim 7.0! It's been a long time coming, but worth the wait. According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vim_(text_editor) it's been almost five years since Vim 6.0 was released. I hadn't realized it had been so long. At what point did Vim 7.0

Re: 7.0 administrivia

2006-05-09 Thread Nikolai Weibull
On 5/9/06, Matthew Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 02:02:24PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote: Well, there's always the following algorithm to consider: if (bram_is_unreasonable) { int new_child = fork(); if (new_child) { // Let Bram continue in his thought-process

Re: 7.0 administrivia

2006-05-09 Thread Matthew Winn
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 04:44:32PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote: On 5/9/06, Matthew Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 02:02:24PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote: Well, there's always the following algorithm to consider: if (bram_is_unreasonable) { int new_child =

7.0 administrivia

2006-05-08 Thread George Reilly
Congratulations on releasing Vim 7.0! It's been a long time coming, but worth the wait. According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vim_(text_editor) it's been almost five years since Vim 6.0 was released. I hadn't realized it had been so long. At what point did Vim 7.0 development start, as