The idea would be to leave the undo list alone, so that when the undo
table gets updated next it'll have a bigger change.
Regards,
Chip Campbell
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea would be to leave the undo list alone, so that when the undo
table gets updated next it'll have a bigger change.
What do you mean? From the very short description it sounds like your
describing :undojoin.
nikolai
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea would be to leave the undo list alone, so that when the undo
table gets updated next it'll have a bigger change.
What do you mean? From the very short description it sounds like your
describing
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea would be to leave the undo list alone, so that when the undo
table gets updated next it'll have a bigger change.
What do you mean?
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 1/29/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea would be to leave the undo list alone, so that when the undo
table gets updated next it'll have a bigger
