How many people actually do that? Should they be doing that?
IMHO I'd force people to use whitespace for concatenation in
this case (i.e. 123 . 456) and have 123.456 be a floating
point number. That's how Perl works, for example. --Antony
That would break compatibility on much, much, much
Le Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:45:18 +0200, Bram Moolenaar a écrit dans le
message [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
One of the items I planned to discuss is why Vim has no floating point
support. Well, this turned into actually implementing it.
Thanks Bram.
Using Windows98, gVim 7.1.291 and Borland C++ 5.5.1 I
Patrick Texier wrote:
Le Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:45:18 +0200, Bram Moolenaar a écrit dans le
message [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
One of the items I planned to discuss is why Vim has no floating point
support. Well, this turned into actually implementing it.
Thanks Bram.
Using Windows98, gVim
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Now the patch is attached, hopefully that works better.
The file diff.dat that you just attached, and your earlier inline mail are
the same. In both cases, there is a problem: the last 12 lines should be
omitted (you can see they are a slightly broken duplicate of the
On 09/04/2008, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Antony Scriven wrote:
On 08/04/2008, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been preparing a talk for the upcoming FISL
conference in Brazil:
http://fisl.softwarelivre.org/9.0/www/
One of the
Hi,
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Antony Scriven wrote:
On 08/04/2008, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been preparing a talk for the upcoming FISL
conference in Brazil:
http://fisl.softwarelivre.org/9.0/www/
One of the items I planned to discuss is why Vim has no
Patch 7.1.292
Problem:When using a pattern with \@= the submatches can be wrong.
(Brett Stahlman)
Solution: Save the submatches when attempting a look-behind match.
Files: src/regexp.c
*** ../vim-7.1.291/src/regexp.c Sat Jan 19 15:55:51 2008
--- src/regexp.cTue
On 09/04/08 12:34, John Beckett wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Now the patch is attached, hopefully that works better.
The file diff.dat that you just attached, and your earlier inline mail are
the same. In both cases, there is a problem: the last 12 lines should be
omitted (you can see they
On 09/04/08 11:30, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
Now the patch is attached, hopefully that works better.
Patch went OK this time -- except for the helpfile, but that was
expected: patches for runtime files are always flaky, and it won't
change anything to the binary.
Added a
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Jürgen Krämer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Antony Scriven wrote:
On 08/04/2008, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main problem with floating point is that the usual
notation already has a meaning:
On 09/04/08 14:51, Ajit Thakkar wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Jürgen Krämer[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Antony Scriven wrote:
On 08/04/2008, Bram Moolenaar[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main problem with floating point is that the usual
Patch 7.1.293
Problem:Spell checking considers super- and subscript characters as word
characters.
Solution: Recognize the Unicode super and subscript characters.
Files: src/spell.c
*** ../vim-7.1.292/src/spell.c Tue Apr 1 17:13:54 2008
--- src/spell.c Wed Apr 9
2008/4/8 Mikolaj Machowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dnia Tuesday 08 of April 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał:
I have been preparing a talk for the upcoming FISL conference in Brazil:
http://fisl.softwarelivre.org/9.0/www/
One of the items I planned to discuss is why Vim has no floating point
Hi,
2008/4/9 Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/4/8 Mikolaj Machowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dnia Tuesday 08 of April 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał:
I have been preparing a talk for the upcoming FISL conference in Brazil:
http://fisl.softwarelivre.org/9.0/www/
One of the
Yegappan Lakshmanan wrote:
2008/4/9 Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/4/8 Mikolaj Machowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dnia Tuesday 08 of April 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisa³:
I have been preparing a talk for the upcoming FISL conference in
Brazil:
Dnia Wednesday 09 of April 2008, Nikolai Weibull napisał:
2008/4/8 Mikolaj Machowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dnia Tuesday 08 of April 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał:
I have been preparing a talk for the upcoming FISL conference in
Brazil: http://fisl.softwarelivre.org/9.0/www/
One of the
Dnia Wednesday 09 of April 2008, Bram Moolenaar napisał:
Now the patch is attached, hopefully that works better.
Thanks, this one is working.
One bug:
:echo 1.90+90
280,00
:echo 1.90-90
100,00
OK, but
:echo 1.90*90
E806: using Float as a String
E15: Illegal expression: 1.90*90
On 09/04/2008 17:27, Mike Williams wrote:
On 09/04/2008 17:16, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Francois Ingelrest wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Easy to reproduce. Turns out that this line causes it:
sprintf(tmp, format, f);
Here
Hi,
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
mmokrejs wrote:
while running 'make install' I get the following on Solaris 2.6
machine:
cut
/bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /usr/local/share/vim/vim71/compiler
mkdir /usr/local/share/vim/vim71/compiler
chmod 755 /usr/local/share/vim/vim71/compiler
/bin/sh
Dnia Wednesday 09 of April 2008, Tony Mechelynck napisał:
runtime/doc/eval.txt, line 40 is unchanged, there is:
There are five types of variables:
There should be:
There are six types of variables:
One more addition to eval.txt, line 5218 (:help type()):
:if type(myvar) ==
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
12 extra lines at the end shouldn't be a problem, since the
patch program will ignore garbage before and after the patch proper.
I was just trying to let Bram know that it would look better if he fixed the
patch (by deleting the last 12 lines), if he were planning to
What's your opinion about a project in VIMas an on the fly code checker.
Steps
-
i.That is VIM text to a temporary file.
ii.Compile it with a compiler.(Either use an external compiler ( preferred
by Mr. Moolenaar) or to write an independent parser plug-in within VIM)
iii.Then re-parse the
22 matches
Mail list logo
