Jan Minář wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Ben Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Minář wrote:
mktemp(1) creates the file securely, with 0600 permissions. That's the
whole point. There is no race condition. That's the whole point.
Presuming the directory it's in is sticky or such
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm missing the part where tutor.vim sets the temp file name. When
tutor.vim does this I suppose all references to $TUTORCOPY can be
removed, I don't understand why you keep it and make it empty.
Hi, Bram!
Somehow the
Hi
I noticed that Vim's spelling checker highlight spelling mistakes
in some parts of doxygen comments, but not everywhere.
The following screenshot illustrates the problem (notice that
not all spelling mistakes are highlighted):
http://dominique.pelle.free.fr/doxygen-spelling.png
Attached
OK, so it turns out, after having to go to the source, that the
'include' pattern only gets fed one line at a time. For the DTD
filetype, having multiple lines would be nice, as that would allow you
to do the following:
setlocal
On Jul 19, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
Your patch is malformed.
- wrapped long line
No way. My patch didn't contain any long lines!
- tabs are spaces
bah... okay, I'll retab it.
- wrong line numbers (why? I'm on svn revision 1114, too)
Weird... that patch is just from
Mark Lundquist, 19.07.2008:
On Jul 19, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
Your patch is malformed.
- wrapped long line
No way. My patch didn't contain any long lines!
Sure! Please try applying the patch yourself, before claiming the opposite.
Your changes didn't contain long
On Jul 19, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
So let me know what you want to do here, as long as I'm revising my
patch. If you want to fix Vim so that the current :h text-objects
does not lie, then I will remove the option, fix startPS(), and
correct :h paragraph in my patch.
I
On Thu 17-Jul-08 2:12pm -0600, Jan Minář wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Jan Minář [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today, I have something that isn't a real vulnerability, but I have
fixed it anyway. The vimtutor (vimtutor.bat on Windows, vimtutor.com
Version 2: I have updated the
