Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mo, 19 Aug 2013, Christian Brabandt wrote:
May be another optional parameter to the setpos() function, that
if given specifies the desired cursor position?
Like the attached patch does.
Hmm, I wonder if the extra list elements are going to cause a problem
On Thu, August 22, 2013 17:23, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mo, 19 Aug 2013, Christian Brabandt wrote:
May be another optional parameter to the setpos() function, that
if given specifies the desired cursor position?
Like the attached patch does.
Hmm, I wonder if
On Aug 22, 2013 8:05 PM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote:
On Thu, August 22, 2013 17:23, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mo, 19 Aug 2013, Christian Brabandt wrote:
May be another optional parameter to the setpos() function, that
if given specifies the
On Do, 22 Aug 2013, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
I bet there is a bunch of scripts using 4-variable lets. Simple grep over
What do you mean with 4-variable lets?
the mess in $HOME/.vam (I hold all but my plugins there) found at least
LaTeX_box plugin (ftplugin/latex-box/common.vim) and
On Aug 22, 2013 10:24 PM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote:
On Do, 22 Aug 2013, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
I bet there is a bunch of scripts using 4-variable lets. Simple grep
over
What do you mean with 4-variable lets?
let [a,b,c,d]=e
the mess in $HOME/.vam (I hold all but
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013 8:05 PM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote:
On Thu, August 22, 2013 17:23, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mo, 19 Aug 2013, Christian Brabandt wrote:
May be another optional parameter to the setpos() function,
On Aug 23, 2013 1:07 AM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013 8:05 PM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org
wrote:
On Thu, August 22, 2013 17:23, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Mo, 19 Aug 2013, Christian Brabandt
On Monday, August 19, 2013 8:16:23 PM UTC+12, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
If you use up down k or j you will not move just above/below the char but
in some weird location
My vim 7.4 doesn't do this, but 7.3.547 does, so it looks like a bug that's
been fixed.
Regards, John Little
--
--
You
If you use up down k or j you will not move just above/below the char
but in some weird location
My vim 7.4 doesn't do this, but 7.3.547 does, so it looks like a bug that's
been fixed.
I used version 7.4 with Included patches: 1-5 so not sure how come you're not
seing it.
Also used: vim
Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
Now try :ec getpos('.') - [0, 4, 17, 0]
Move away and :call setpos('.',[0,4,17,0])
If you use up down k or j you will not move just
above/below the char but in some weird location
Say the cursor is in column 20, then setpos() is used to jump
to [d], then k is pressed.
On Mon, August 19, 2013 11:30, John Beckett wrote:
Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
Now try :ec getpos('.') - [0, 4, 17, 0]
Move away and :call setpos('.',[0,4,17,0])
If you use up down k or j you will not move just
above/below the char but in some weird location
Say the cursor is in column 20, then
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Dimitar DIMITROV mitk...@yahoo.fr wrote:
I will use the following text as an example:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor
incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis
nostrud
On Mo, 19 Aug 2013, Christian Brabandt wrote:
May be another optional parameter to the setpos() function, that
if given specifies the desired cursor position?
Like the attached patch does.
regards,
Christian
--
Es gehört viel dazu, eine Brücke hinter sich abzureißen, wenn man auch
keine vor
13 matches
Mail list logo
