Hi Mike!
On So, 21 Jul 2013, Mike Williams wrote:
On 20/07/2013 10:13, LCD 47 wrote:
I believe this can be fixed with a counter that means something
along the lines of: this line is longer than tw, and it has no
breaking point for the first X characters. Then X would be updated
every
On Jul 23, 2013 9:24 AM, Gary Johnson garyj...@spocom.com wrote:
On 2013-07-23, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Jul 20, 2013 2:28 AM, Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2013-07-19, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
Hi Dimitar,
It would be a big help to those of us with threading mail readers if
you
Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
There is no use case
If you do something stupid by accident most vim operations can be
aborted by ctrl-c (exception: python, rbuy, .. scripts)
Try to abort it you will see the success you have.
So there is still nothing to fix or talk about unless there is a use
On Jul 20, 2013 2:28 AM, Gary Johnson garyj...@spocom.com wrote:
On 2013-07-19, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
Hi Dimitar,
It would be a big help to those of us with threading mail readers if
you would be sure that your replies include Re: at the start of
the Subject.
This has nothing to do
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 07:39:12AM +0400, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Jul 20, 2013 2:28 AM, Gary Johnson garyj...@spocom.com wrote:
On 2013-07-19, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
Hi Dimitar,
It would be a big help to those of us with threading mail readers if
you would be sure that your
On 2013-07-23, Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
On Jul 20, 2013 2:28 AM, Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2013-07-19, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
Hi Dimitar,
It would be a big help to those of us with threading mail readers if
you would be sure that your replies include Re: at the start of
the Subject.
On 20/07/2013 10:13, LCD 47 wrote:
On 19 July 2013, Mike Williams mike.willi...@globalgraphics.com wrote:
On 19/07/2013 15:52, Mike Williams wrote:
On 19/07/2013 12:18, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
Hi,
Did a search on the vim_dev archives but couldn't find anything
related to this. Sorry if this
There is no use case
If you do something stupid by accident most vim operations can be
aborted by ctrl-c (exception: python, rbuy, .. scripts)
Try to abort it you will see the success you have.
So there is still nothing to fix or talk about unless there is a use
case.
Marc Weber
On 19 July 2013, Mike Williams mike.willi...@globalgraphics.com wrote:
On 19/07/2013 15:52, Mike Williams wrote:
On 19/07/2013 12:18, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
Hi,
Did a search on the vim_dev archives but couldn't find anything
related to this. Sorry if this is redundant. Basically vim is
Hi,
Did a search on the vim_dev archives but couldn't find anything related to
this. Sorry if this is redundant.
Basically vim is exponentially slow after 100iHello esc as mentionned in
this link:
http://www.galexander.org/vim_sucks.html
Regards
Dimitar
---
GPG Key: 2048R/160C6FA8
Excerpts from Dimitar DIMITROV's message of Fri Jul 19 13:18:09 +0200 2013:
Hi,
Did a search on the vim_dev archives but couldn't find anything related to
this. Sorry if this is redundant.
Basically vim is exponentially slow after 100iHello esc as mentionned
in this link:
On 19/07/2013 12:18, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
Hi,
Did a search on the vim_dev archives but couldn't find anything related to
this. Sorry if this is redundant.
Basically vim is exponentially slow after 100iHello esc as mentionned in
this link:
http://www.galexander.org/vim_sucks.html
A
On 19/07/2013 15:52, Mike Williams wrote:
On 19/07/2013 12:18, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
Hi,
Did a search on the vim_dev archives but couldn't find anything related to
this. Sorry if this is redundant.
Basically vim is exponentially slow after 100iHello esc as mentionned in
this link:
Excerpts from Dimitar DIMITROV's message of Fri Jul 19 23:14:44 +0200 2013:
Try to abort it you will see the success you have.
1600iAutoescc-c aborts almost instantly
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 (2010 Aug 15, compiled Jun 9 2013 16:56:22)
Included patches: 1-1155
vim and gvim tested .. Have
Hi,
Did a search on the vim_dev archives but couldn't find anything related to
this. Sorry if this is redundant.
Basically vim is exponentially slow after 100iHello esc as mentioned
in this link:
http://www.galexander.org/vim_sucks.html
Let's discuss the use case, first. Is
On 2013-07-19, Dimitar DIMITROV wrote:
Hi Dimitar,
It would be a big help to those of us with threading mail readers if
you would be sure that your replies include Re: at the start of
the Subject.
Thanks,
Gary
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type
16 matches
Mail list logo