On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:50:34PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 11:40:21AM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:37:55AM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 04:45:31PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:50:34PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 11:40:21AM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:37:55AM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
This seems like a big problem. How are we going to know
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:17:02PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Well, to do it correctly you are going to have to tell the driver to
shut itself down, and reinitialize itself.
Turns out, that doesn't really work for disk and network devices without
dropping the connection (well, network devices
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:17:02PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Well, to do it correctly you are going to have to tell the driver to
shut itself down, and reinitialize itself.
Turns out, that doesn't really work for disk and network devices without
dropping the connection (well,
Hello Lance,
Thanks for your interest in SR-IOV. As Greg said we can't have a git
tree for the change, but you are welcome to ask any question here and I
also will keep you informed if there is any update on the SR-IOV patches.
Thanks,
Yu
Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:58:25AM
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 03:07:57PM -0800, Nauman Rafique wrote:
It seems that approaches with two level scheduling (DM-IOBand or this
patch set on top and another scheduler at elevator) will have the
possibility of undesirable interactions (see issues listed at the
end of the second patch).
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 11:32:09AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:30:23 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ISSUES
+==
+- IO controller can buffer the bios if suffcient tokens were not available
+ at the time of bio submission. Once the tokens are available,
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 11:50:30AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:30:24 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o biocgroup functionality.
o Implemented new controller bio
o Most of it picked from dm-ioband biocgroup implementation patches.
page_cgroup
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 12:21:45PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:30:25 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o Core IO controller implementation
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 comments after a quick look.
- I don't recommend generic work
Anthony Liguori [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What we would rather do in KVM, is have the VFs appear in the host as
standard network devices. We would then like to back our existing PV
driver to this VF directly bypassing the host networking stack. A key
feature here is being able to fill the
While we are arguing what the software model the SR-IOV should be, let
me ask two simple questions first:
1, What does the SR-IOV looks like?
2, Why do we need to support it?
I'm sure people have different understandings from their own view
points. No one is wrong, but, please don't make thing
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 11:41 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 06:11:27PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 11:57 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
The only real issue I can see is with linear volumes, but those are
stupid anyway -
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
[Anna, can you fix your word-wrapping please? Your lines appear to be
infinitely long which is most unpleasant to reply to]
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 05:38:16PM +, Fischer, Anna wrote:
Where would the VF drivers have to be associated? On
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Zhao, Yu
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 11:06 PM
To: Chris Wright
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
Matthew Wilcox; Greg KH; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:36:50AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If you are not already tired of so many io controller implementations, here
is another one.
This is a very eary very crude implementation to get early feedback to see
if this approach makes
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 11:17:40PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
While we are arguing what the software model the SR-IOV should be, let me
ask two simple questions first:
1, What does the SR-IOV looks like?
2, Why do we need to support it?
I don't think we need to worry about those questions, as we
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:35:47PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:17:02PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Well, to do it correctly you are going to have to tell the driver to
shut itself down, and reinitialize itself.
Turns out, that doesn't really work for disk and
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 03:07:57PM -0800, Nauman Rafique wrote:
It seems that approaches with two level scheduling (DM-IOBand or this
patch set on top and another scheduler at elevator) will have the
possibility of
Vivek Goyal said:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 12:21:45PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:30:25 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o Core IO controller implementation
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 comments after a quick look.
- I don't recommend
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:35:47PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:17:02PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Well, to do it correctly you are going to have to tell the driver to
shut itself down, and reinitialize itself.
Turns out, that doesn't really
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 01:00:29PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:35:47PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:17:02PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Well, to do it correctly you are going to have to tell the driver to
shut itself down,
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 01:50:20PM +0800, freevanx wrote:
Dear all,
I'm glad to hear this. In fact, I'm developing for BIOS area. This feature
is very useful when your system have one or more PCI/PCIe hotplug slot.
Generally, BIOS reserve amount of resource for empty hotplug slot by
Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 01:00:29PM +0800, Yu Zhao wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:35:47PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:17:02PM +0800, Zhao, Yu wrote:
Well, to do it correctly you are going to have to tell the driver to
shut
23 matches
Mail list logo
