Re: [Virtuoso-users] bif:rdf_make_iid_of_qname() no longer supported?

2014-02-07 Thread Rob Vesse
As the original error message I posted implies I am attempting to use the function via SPARQL hence the bif: prefix and why the error comes from the SPARQL compiler OpenLink.Data.Virtuoso.VirtuosoException : Virtuoso Error: SQL_ERRORSQLSTATE: 37000Message: [Virtuoso .NET Data

Re: [Virtuoso-users] The array extend is less than requested

2014-02-07 Thread Nicola Vitucci
Hi Hugh, I can't find the exact version right now, but it's indeed a quite recent Virtuoso 7 single server (open source version). Is there a way to find the build from the command line? Also, is it possible that slightly different builds use the database files in a different way, thus causing

Re: [Virtuoso-users] The array extend is less than requested

2014-02-07 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Nicola, You can run the command virtuoso-t -? to get the full version and build date ... Best Regards Hugh Williams Professional Services OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/ Weblog -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/ LinkedIn --

Re: [Virtuoso-users] The array extend is less than requested

2014-02-07 Thread Nicola Vitucci
Hi Hugh, in the meanwhile I found that the build has SHA 48f0ef879b913c5d3b306c1f83390079c5416fe6. Nicola Il 07/02/2014 12:26, Hugh Williams ha scritto: Hi Nicola, You can run the command virtuoso-t -? to get the full version and build date ... Best Regards Hugh Williams

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Require Unique integer ID for each RDF Triple

2014-02-07 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 2/5/14 5:56 PM, Kevin wrote: Kingsley, I would like to make some final clarifications before I begin. This is a big time consuming decision so I want to try to choose wisely. -Should I transform only the portion of my database (half) that is going to need provenance reification?

Re: [Virtuoso-users] bif:rdf_make_iid_of_qname() no longer supported?

2014-02-07 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Rob, Ah, it must be a bif: (built-in-function) vs sql: (Virtuoso PL) function change then as there were some changes for SPARQL 1.1 compliance in this area in 2012, so use the sql: prefix instead: SQL sparql delete from http://sample/ { `bif:rdf_make_iid_of_qname('http://localhost:8890')`

[Virtuoso-users] Require Unique integer ID for each RDF Triple

2014-02-07 Thread Kevin
Virtuoso Fans, For a year I have really needed Virtuoso to provide a unique integer ID for each RDF triple. In other words, I would like Virtuoso to store SPOGI (Like AllegroGraph) instead of just SPOG. Often people question if I really need the index. It is essentially for numerous reasons

[Virtuoso-users] Duplicate rows in result of SPARQL query

2014-02-07 Thread Nádudvari Gyuri (Reedcourty)
Hi Everybody, I have a problem with the SPARQL engine of Virtuoso. I want to use it with the next ontology: ?xml version=1.0? rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#; xmlns:owl=http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#; xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#;

[Virtuoso-users] deleting large graph crash vos7

2014-02-07 Thread Roland Cornelissen
Hi, I try to delete a larger graph (300M triples) on my VOS7 store (07.00.3203-pthreads for Linux, Database version 3126) but VOS crashes on a memory problem. I down scaled memory assignment in virtuoso.ini to 12GB (the box has 16 GB, previously 14 GB was assigned) in virtuoso.ini ; 12 GB

Re: [Virtuoso-users] Duplicate rows in result of SPARQL query

2014-02-07 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 2/4/14 6:46 AM, Nádudvari Gyuri (Reedcourty) wrote: Hi Everybody, I have a problem with the SPARQL engine of Virtuoso. I want to use it with the next ontology: ?xml version=1.0? rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf=http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#;

Re: [Virtuoso-users] bif:rdf_make_iid_of_qname() no longer supported?

2014-02-07 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Rob, The change was made between the 6.1.5 and 6.16 release it seems, but testing against an older 6.1.3 build either the bif or sql: prefixes work, so you could change to use the latter to cover all bases: C:\virtuoso-opensource-win64-20110330\virtuoso-opensource\database..\bin\virtuoso-t

Re: [Virtuoso-users] bif:rdf_make_iid_of_qname() no longer supported?

2014-02-07 Thread Rob Vesse
Ok thanks Could you perhaps track down when exactly the change happened (I.e which release)? Ideally my code needs to continue to be backwards compatible with people using older Virtuoso installations so being able to detect which form of the function call I should use by inspecting the

Re: [Virtuoso-users] deleting large graph crash vos7

2014-02-07 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Roland, Did run have the log_enable(3) option to turn off transactions when performing such large operations on graphs to reduce the memory required, as detailed in the document at: http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/dataspace/doc/dav/wiki/Main/VirtTipsAndTricksGuideDeleteLargeGraphs

Re: [Virtuoso-users] deleting large graph crash vos7

2014-02-07 Thread Roland Cornelissen
Hi Hugh, I didn't turn of transactions by log_enable(3). I have a new try running right now. I'll let you know if that made difference. The VOS7 version used is: Virtuoso Open Source Edition (Column Store) (multi threaded) Version 7.0.0.3203-pthreads as of Sep 16 2013 Compiled for Linux

Re: [Virtuoso-users] deleting large graph crash vos7

2014-02-07 Thread Hugh Williams
Hi Roland, Glad to here log_enable(3) enabled the large graph to be deleted ... Best Regards Hugh Williams Professional Services OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/ Weblog -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/ LinkedIn --