Hello Zach...
All your scenarios are valid.
The program functionality COULD be perfect.
What bothers us the conflict of Secure Communications
with trust in someone who is paying lots of money for Internet
band width to provide the service for no visible reason.
I'm sorry, I just can't fit the 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. I'm trying to get a vnc connection going between a Windows-based
vnc4 server at work and a (Debian) Linux-based xvnc4viewer client at
home.
Once enter the password the connection to the server on the Windows
host is successfully established, but it dies immediately
Alex,
I'm afraid the citation links seem to be broken (nat.html is missing), so
it's difficult to see any of the supporting documentation for this.
As it stands, UDP hole-punching fundamentally requires that your NAT
router allow UDP traffic through, which is not something most good NAT
In my implementation, I had to restrict what the users could get up to,
but not too obtrusively. The ideal solution, and one which hides this
tray icon naturally, was to hide the entire taskbar when my main
application was started. This stops them mucking around on the PC while
the program is
KJ,
Connection rejected by user means that the VNC Server is configured to
prompt the local user of the computer on which it is running to accept the
connection. If they don't accept it, or if they explicitly reject it,
you'll see this message.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sajjan Singhania
Sent: 03 March 2005 07:08
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Connectivity without Internet
Can I use Remote Access Software on my local network without
any connectivity to
Yann,
Having a large desktop will NOT cause the message Connection rejected by
user to be returned. Instead, you will usually get the (less helpful)
Connection closed unexpectedly message, and an error in your Windows
Application Event Log.
The problem Yann is seeing will be resolved in VNC
Mark,
This sounds like A Very Bad Thing to do to a poor unsuspecting user, unless
the application in question is some sort of Kiosk style of system.
Cheers,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Sent: 03
James Weatherall wrote:
Yann,
Having a large desktop will NOT cause the message Connection rejected by
user to be returned. Instead, you will usually get the (less helpful)
Connection closed unexpectedly message, and an error in your Windows
Application Event Log.
The problem Yann is seeing will
How about a suspecting user? The system is a market research suite. It
has an entry point which is a Main Menu of current projects, and this
main menu is really all they are supposed to be using. The users sit in
booths interviewing people for MR purposes, and the suite collates the
data and
John,
Can you tell what to look for in the registry to determine if it was
hacked. Sadly, I was using 3.3.7 (guess) until recently. Now I'm on 4.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 11:24 AM
To: 'James Weatherall';
Pedro,
As I said earlier, VNC 4 does not have the vulnerability found in VNC 3.3
that allows the tray icon to be disabled.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Hermida @ Hotmail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 March 2005 12:37
To: 'John Aldrich'; 'James
Dear John,
I read what you said earlier and maybe I did not explain myself well enough.
I was using a prior version, 3.3.X when a report came to me of an unusual PC
mouse moves and keystrokes, file left open, etc. I took copies of registry
and log files before upgrading to 4. If there is a way to
NAT2NAT without port configuration is not that hard to implement.
A nat router need to keep the udp ports open for a amount of time,
unlike tcp that close on disconnect.
Using a 3the server you can cross nat info and make a direct connection.
It works for nat routers, it does NOT work if the
Pedro,
When John referred to hacking the registry, he just meant modifying it.
You originally asked about how to hide the tray icon, but you say that you
were using VNC 3.3.7 - are you saying that you were using it but without the
tray icon visible?
VNC 3.3.7 doesn't log anything very useful,
Rudi,
I notice that you keep referring to VNC as real. For future reference,
please note that RealVNC Ltd. is the company that produces the VNC product.
So the product is called VNC, not real. :)
Cheers,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
___
VNC-List mailing list
I agree with Wez with some reservations. I've been in charge of large
networks for over 10 years and I've seen my fair share of mischievous
users. While I believe that it is unethical to spy on your users
without just cause, there are some scenarios where the ability to hide
the VNC icon is
Jerry,
We are NOT paying lots of money as we do NOT relay your
traffic. It is p2p system, the bandwidth usage for us is
under few megs a day. Can you fit this together under one hat ?
Alex
PS Sorry, James, I couldn't left this unanswered.
Jerry Westrick wrote:
Hello Zach...
All your scenarios are
James Weatherall wrote:
Alex,
I'm afraid the citation links seem to be broken (nat.html is missing), so
it's difficult to see any of the supporting documentation for this.
Works for me just fine, but here's a direct link anyway -
http://www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/p2pnat.pdf
And
Pedro,
Don't know if you got James' reply, but in VNC4 the registry hack doesn't
work any more.
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Hermida @ Hotmail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 7:37 AM
To: 'John Aldrich'; 'James Weatherall'; vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE:
Alex Pankratov wrote:
Jerry,
We are NOT paying lots of money as we do NOT relay your
traffic. It is p2p system, the bandwidth usage for us is
under few megs a day. Can you fit this together under one hat ?
Alex,
No need for the tone of your last sentence. I grasp what you are doing
as I am sure
Alex,
Actually, as I said in previous mail, it's the citation links that are
broken, not the link to the document itself.
To summarise the hole-punching aspect of things, it's basically the case
that msot NAT routers keep track of recent outbound UDP packets will allow
incoming traffic
RealVNC is pleased to announce the release of VNC Free Edition 4.1.
VNC Free Edition 4.1 is a major overhaul of the previous VNC 4.0
release, benefitting from the significant stability and performance
improvements made in the development of VNC Enterprise Edition
___
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
At 050303 12:53 -0500, Zach Dennis wrote:
Alex Pankratov wrote:
Jerry,
We are NOT paying lots of money as we do NOT relay your
traffic. It is p2p system, the bandwidth usage for us is
under few megs a day. Can you fit this together under one hat ?
Alex,
No need for the tone of your last sentence.
Paul,
VNC Viewer Free Edition 4.1 attempts to center the window on the specified
monitor (usually the primary monitor), and the clips the window to lay
completely within the working area, i.e. within the area not covered by
any toolbars, the taskbar etc.
We did not see the problem you describe
Downloaded and installed...
Thanks for the great program!
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: James Weatherall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 11:01 AM
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VNC Free Edition 4.1 released
RealVNC is pleased to announce
Ah, was not aware of that Thanks for fixing this though!
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: James Weatherall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 12:21 PM
To: 'Paul Haskew'
Subject: RE: Bug issue - viewer starting window location
Paul,
The reason for not using the
Zach Dennis wrote:
Alex,
No need for the tone of your last sentence.
Ugh, yeah, I re-read it and it doesn't sound right. For that
I apologize. But it does frustrate me a lot when people make
bold statements without bothering to take a little time to
read what has already been said on the subject
Adam Erica said:
Is there a way that I can contact the management or developers at RealVNC
without using the list? I am thinking of an e-mail address or a form
submission?
http://www.realvnc.com/contact.html
--
William Hooper
___
VNC-List mailing
I've been in need of some software that sounds like it could be done using VNC
code. I have 2 computers and a laptop at home for a total of 3 monitors.
What I've been looking for is something such that when I drag a window off the
left side of my middle monitor, it will appear as an independent
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 03:15:51PM -0800, Mcelhenney, Bryan wrote:
I've been in need of some software that sounds like it could be done using VNC
code. I have 2 computers and a laptop at home for a total of 3 monitors.
What I've been looking for is something such that when I drag a window off
Hi,
As instructed by
http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/x0.html
I copied vnc.so to
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/vnc.so
then added it to Modules:
Section Module
...
Load vnc
EndSection
But when I start X I get error:
(II) LoadModule: vnc
(II) Loading
Hi,
As instructed by
http://www.realvnc.com/products/free/4.1/x0.html
I copied vnc.so to
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/vnc.so
then added it to Modules:
Section Module
...
Load vnc
EndSection
But when I start X I get error:
(II) LoadModule: vnc
(II) Loading
hello
I have a home network setup. with a windows 2000 desktop and
a windows XP laptop connected through a netgear router. the laptop
has wireless connection to the router.
I have VNC server running at my work. and the tightVNC viewer
running on desktop is able to connect fine, but the laptop
RealVNC is pleased to announce the release of VNC Free Edition 4.1.
Thanks for your effort to provide such a good tool! But I don't see any
description about update for Java viewer in neither release notes nor
download page. Does Java viewer keep the same with previous v4.0?
Regards,
Kevin
I installed vnc 3.3 r2 on Solaris 8 (SunFire v440) server. I edited the
vncserver and xstartup script to start the vnc as a CDE. Vnc starts fine -
however, when I try to start Terminal Console by Right Clicking Workspace
Menu-Hosts-Terminal Console, nothing appears on the screen. Can someone
help?
From: James Weatherall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:45:00 -
KJ,
Connection rejected by user means that the VNC Server is configured to
prompt the local user of the computer on which it is running to accept the
connection. If they don't accept it, or if they
Awesome! Are there any new Java sources as well?
James Weatherall wrote:
RealVNC is pleased to announce the release of VNC Free Edition 4.1.
VNC Free Edition 4.1 is a major overhaul of the previous VNC 4.0
release, benefitting from the significant stability and performance
improvements made in the
39 matches
Mail list logo
