Hamachi runs on Windows, OSX and x86 Linux at the moment,
so it does not look like an option here.
Alex
Jim Hill wrote:
Would Hamachi do it?
see http://www.hamachi.cc/
Not sure if it's cross-platorm.
lim wrote:
Application I'm searching for, should listen to two ports, and when
both are
that this has been
discussed at http://forums.hamachi.cc. Search for 'routed tunneling'.
Cheers,
--
Alex Pankratov
Applied Networking Inc.
___
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo
You may want to look at Hamachi (http://hamachi.cc).
Alex
Ravi Teja wrote:
Withu UltraVNC i am able to connect to remote machines through LAN and through
Internet, but these needs to be port forwarding done. Is there anyway to make
it work without opening ports ? Will UltaVNC NAT2NAT solve
Have you considered content-filtering firewall ? Most of them
are packaged as a service solution, so there's a monthly fee,
but it sure beats in-person monitoring.
Alex
Mel Dundas-taylor wrote:
Hi,
I've just subscribed to this site and am probably asking an already answered question. I
Jerry,
We are NOT paying lots of money as we do NOT relay your
traffic. It is p2p system, the bandwidth usage for us is
under few megs a day. Can you fit this together under one hat ?
Alex
PS Sorry, James, I couldn't left this unanswered.
Jerry Westrick wrote:
Hello Zach...
All your scenarios are
James Weatherall wrote:
Alex,
I'm afraid the citation links seem to be broken (nat.html is missing), so
it's difficult to see any of the supporting documentation for this.
Works for me just fine, but here's a direct link anyway -
http://www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/p2pnat.pdf
And
Zach Dennis wrote:
Alex,
No need for the tone of your last sentence.
Ugh, yeah, I re-read it and it doesn't sound right. For that
I apologize. But it does frustrate me a lot when people make
bold statements without bothering to take a little time to
read what has already been said on the subject
be used in a positive,
legitimate fashion.
Alex Pankratov wrote:
Paul Haskew wrote:
While I am glad to see the main designer/developer here, I do not
wear tin
foil hats. :P I am just a concerned IT Admin, who will at one point will
have to make a decision about this program.
TCP/11975 ;-)
Also
: Alex Pankratov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 4:25 PM
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: A simple, solid and stable P2P Bidirectional NAT Traversal
technique for RealVNC users...
I am principle designer and developer of Hamachi. I got few hits
from this maillist, checked
Nick Kovats wrote:
What is your take on SHA1 being recently broken by Chinese researchers?
My take would be like this - 'when I win a lottery I should no more be
buying Bentleys with gold plated door handles, because they tend to get
cold in a winter time'. Ie it's not a yet problem worth worrying
(routable) IP/port numbers. The clients then hook up on their own
and the rest of the traffic flows directly between them.
Does that mean that you do NOT use a proxy server in the middle?
John
-Original Message-
From: Alex Pankratov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02
Hey Scott,
Yes we do UDP hole punching, but the numbers given in the p2pnat
paper are somewhat inaccurate. See my recent posts to p2p-hackers
list for detailed statistics.
To sum it up here - with around 2 unique IPs we saw so far we
were successfully mediate 97% of requested tunnels. Which in
Of Alex Pankratov
Sent: 02 March 2005 17:09
To: John Aldrich
Cc: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: A simple, solid and stable P2P Bidirectional NAT
Traversal te chnique for RealVNC users...
http://www.kaboodle.org/KaboodleProxy.html says -
.. to find and connect with each other, by enabling
James Weatherall wrote:
Alex,
So, in fact, there is a degree of configuration required at at least one end
(in order to allow the incoming connection through the NAT), and so this
whole setup could be replaced by a dynamic DNS name for the server... :)
Anyway guys, I think it's time this
I am principle designer and developer of Hamachi. I got few hits
from this maillist, checked out the comments and since we don't
have much information on the website I thought I'd offer some
answers here.
Since I just joined the list I don't have original emails, so
here's a summary with my
Paul Haskew wrote:
While I am glad to see the main designer/developer here, I do not wear tin
foil hats. :P I am just a concerned IT Admin, who will at one point will
have to make a decision about this program.
TCP/11975 ;-)
Also, about trusted outsiders, I am not worried about me setting up
16 matches
Mail list logo
