[OFFTOPIC] RE: A simple, solid and stable P2P Bidirectional NAT Traversal te chnique for RealVNC users...

2005-03-03 Thread James Weatherall
Alex, I'm afraid the citation links seem to be broken (nat.html is missing), so it's difficult to see any of the supporting documentation for this. As it stands, UDP hole-punching fundamentally requires that your NAT router allow UDP traffic through, which is not something most good NAT

Re: [OFFTOPIC] RE: A simple, solid and stable P2P Bidirectional NAT Traversal te chnique for RealVNC users...

2005-03-03 Thread Alex Pankratov
James Weatherall wrote: Alex, I'm afraid the citation links seem to be broken (nat.html is missing), so it's difficult to see any of the supporting documentation for this. Works for me just fine, but here's a direct link anyway - http://www.brynosaurus.com/pub/net/p2pnat.pdf And

RE: [OFFTOPIC] RE: A simple, solid and stable P2P Bidirectional NAT Traversal te chnique for RealVNC users...

2005-03-03 Thread James Weatherall
Alex, Actually, as I said in previous mail, it's the citation links that are broken, not the link to the document itself. To summarise the hole-punching aspect of things, it's basically the case that msot NAT routers keep track of recent outbound UDP packets will allow incoming traffic