Posted by David Kopel:
U.N. Conference Ending, Freedom Winning!!
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_07_02-2006_07_08.shtml#1152314168


   As of 6 p.m. eastern time, the word from the United Nations small arms
   conference is that the conference is concluding with NO final
   document, and NO plans for any follow-up conference. It was the latter
   issue that prevented an agreement about a final document. The
   officials who had been charged by the conference chair with drafting
   the conference document presented a final take-it-or-leave it document
   a little while ago; that draft document eliminated various provisions
   that the U.S. delegation had found objectionable, but also declared
   that there would be at least two more conferences. The U.S. delegation
   refused to assent, and so the conference ended with no consensus
   agreement, and no plans for future conferences. The back-up plan of
   the international gun prohibition movement, and their many allies
   within the U.N. and national U.N. delegations, was to give up on
   significant progress in 2006, but to keep the game going with future
   conferences, when a more pliant U.S. administration might welcome an
   international gun control program.
   If a few hundred votes had changed in Florida in 2000, or if 60,000
   votes had changed in Ohio in 2004, the results of the 2001 and 2006
   U.N. gun control conferences would have been entirely different. There
   would now be a legally binding international treaty creating an
   international legal norm against civilian gun ownership, a prohibition
   on the transfer of firearms to "non-state actors" (such as groups
   resisting tyrants), and a new newspeak international human rights
   standard requiring restrictive licensing of gun owners. With a
   Presidential signature on such a treaty (even if the treaty were never
   brought to the Senate floor for ratification), the principles of the
   anti-gun treaty would be eroding the Second Amendment, through
   Executive Orders, and through the inclination of some courts to use
   unratified treaties as guidance in interpretting the U.S.
   Constitution.
   At the domestic level, the Bush administration has been close to
   neutral on the gun issue -- doing very little to promote or oppose gun
   control in Congress. One rare exception was that the Ashcroft
   Department of Justice returned to the [1]historic (pre-LBJ) DOJ
   position that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right. And
   of course President Bush has signed all the pro-Second Amendment
   legislation which Congress has sent him, more importantly the
   Protection of Lawful Commerce in Firearms Act.
   At the United Nations, however, the Bush administration has twice
   rescued our right to keep and bear arms from destruction.
   There are plenty of issues on which pro-Constitution Americans can
   legitimately complain that the Bush administration has continued or
   worsened bad policies from previous administrations -- such as federal
   interference in education, erosion of the Fourth Amendment, and
   allowing the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to
   ignore statutory controls on its behavior. But in regards to the
   United Nations assault on the Second Amendment, the Bush
   administration, including John Bolton (in 2001 as Undersecretary of
   State, and in 2006 as U.N. Ambassador) has performed magnificently.
   The gun rights activists whose hard work in 2000 and 2004 was the sine
   qua non of Bush's narrow electoral victories can take satisfaction
   that their work has, literally, saved the Second Amendment.
   Today's victory is extremely important, but it should not be mistaken
   for a final victory in the international arena. The international gun
   prohibition lobbies are already looking towards other international
   fora where they can advance their goals, including their ultimate
   prize--a binding treaty requiring severe restriction of citizen gun
   possession. The various U.N. departments which have been providing
   funding and propaganda for gun prohibition and confiscation will
   almost certainly continue to do so.
   For now, everyone who cares about the right to arms has much to
   celebrate.
   Two of the most important, but less-known heroes of today's victory
   are Dr. Paul Gallant and Dr. Joanne Eisen, Senior Fellows at the
   Independence Institute. [2]They have worked relentlessly to give a
   voice to the victims around the world for whom gun confiscation really
   was the crucial step to the destruction of all their other rights, or
   the destruction of life itself -- in places such as Bouganville,
   Uganda, Kenya, Bosnia, and Zimbabwe. Today, the world is a better,
   freer place because of Paul and Joanne.

References

   1. http://www.nationalreview.com/kopel/kopel052901.shtml
   2. http://www.davekopel.org/team.htm#Gallant

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh@lists.powerblogs.com
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to