Limited financial means are not a problem for a proof of principle experiment
IMHO.
OK let's assume one is able to extract energy from a single heat source, even
if serious doubts subsist. What would be the practical use, considering there
already exist compact highly overunity commercial
- Original Message -
From: Charles M. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 5:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Proof of capturing ambient temperature energy
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:48:47 +0100
Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To avoid the
Hi Steven,
When these smaller atomic nuclei are created wouldn't that also mean that
the individual protons and neutrons within these lighter elements have to
suddenly regain lost mass if their atomic number is less that Fe?
This is exactly what I have been saying. I'm glad somebody is
Michel Jullian wrote:
---
Limited financial means are not a problem for a proof of principle experiment
IMHO.
---
I'm not sure it's that simple in this case. People debate about everything,
including their own reality; e.g., Can you prove or disprove your life is
nothing but a virtual
Hello David,
When these smaller atomic nuclei are created wouldn't
that also mean that the individual protons and neutrons
within these lighter elements have to suddenly regain
lost mass if their atomic number is less that Fe?
This is exactly what I have been saying. I'm glad
somebody is
http://www.freewebs.com/radiation-shield/
Sure, experimental evidence is needed, a patent doesn't prove that something
works.
Proof of principle experiment design must be as simple as possible and based on
sound principles, it can be discussed here, other than that the actual
experiment can be conducted in one's kitchen I guess.
The
- Original Message -
From: Charles M. Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 2:24 PM
Subject: [Vo]: Re [Vo] FET rectification-refrigeration-models-part of Proof of
capturing ambient temperature energy
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 11:20:10 +0100
Michel
Michel Jullian wrote:
---
Sure, experimental evidence is needed, a patent doesn't prove that something
works.
---
That's what I said.
---
Proof of principle experiment design must be as simple as possible and based
on sound principles, it can be discussed here, other than that the
People are talking about NSA working with Microsoft.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/browse_frm/thread/59ceb37bb8bf6ea0/63b615317e57df5b?#63b615317e57df5b
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Michel Jullian wrote:
The highly OU commercial ambient air energy pumping devices I was
talking about are those residential heating heat pumps we have been
discussing in the 'loop closed' thread, they commonly reach COPs of
4 (1000W out for 250W in, the excess coming from ambient air).
I
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
The highly OU commercial ambient air energy pumping devices I was
talking about are those residential heating heat pumps we have been
discussing in the 'loop closed' thread, they commonly reach COPs of 4
(1000W out for 250W in, the excess coming from
Hi Paul,
Come on, you're not that naïve, are you? Even before the NSA officially
existed, they were directly involved with telephone circuits. Remember back
in the sixties when it was a felony to open your telephone and modify it?
That is because the circuits have a feature that allows the NSA
David Thomson wrote:
Remember back in the sixties when it was a felony to open your
telephone and modify it?
That is preposterous. The 1933 FCC rules forbade attachment to the
telephone network of any device not furnished by the telephone
company. They said nothing about opening up
I wrote:
Millions of people opened up telephones in the 1960s, including me.
I might add that my father was something of an expert at spotting and
disconnecting 1940s era listening devices, because he traveled around
Russia during WWII on U.S. Embassy business. The only way to get room
John Berry wrote:
On 3/8/07, *Stephen A. Lawrence* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how about you try working through the mathematics of the
contradictions you think you've found in relativity, and post the
results here?
I mean, work them through using
On 3/8/07, David Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Future phones will be directly tracked by
GPS.
You're living in the past. :-) Most phones have had GPS chips since
2004. No one triangulates any more. It was a requirement of the
Enhanced 911 service.
Allegedly, I can turn this feature on
I so hate to get involved in these types of discussions, but I do have first
hand knowledge on some of what is going on and I will state it, even though
I see already that many will dispute it.
1) Prior to ESS phone systems, the old relay banks did not work well for
covert monitoring. It did
Correct, but not totally.
The introduction was by the Family Friends feature. Where is my girl
friend, where is my husband, where is that bar where the boss wants to meet
me.
The E911 system was based on signal time domain to cell sites when first
introduced because the chips were not yet
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
1) Prior to ESS phone systems, the old relay banks did not work well for
covert monitoring. It did require intervention from the phone company that
controlled the switches. It was possible to bridge a line and have it
monitored via another line, yet the best method
Hi Jed,
Remember back in the sixties when it was a felony to open your
telephone and modify it?
That is preposterous. The 1933 FCC rules forbade attachment to the
telephone network of any device not furnished by the telephone
company. They said nothing about opening up telephones. Millions
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
There has been lively debate in regards to whether E=mc^2 is an accurate
mathematical equation to describe whether energy is actually being converted
back and forth between mass and energy. No doubt many are likely to consider
it outrageous to challenge
Well, well!
The old phone systems. disconnected the transmitter (carbon mouth piece)
element from the phone line, by direct open contact. If you dispute this get
an old phone and check it out. In the older systems it was not possible
without modification.
I was the principal in NSI (search for
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
Well, well!
The old phone systems. disconnected the transmitter (carbon mouth piece)
element from the phone line, by direct open contact. If you dispute this get
an old phone and check it out. In the older systems it was not possible
without modification.
I do not
I scanned and uploaded a derivation of E = mc^2 which does not use
the mathematical formalism of Special Relativity.
Four pages from Max Born's book _Einstein's Theory of Relativity_
(about 1M):
http://web.ncf.ca/eo200/derivation.html
Harry
Hi Stephen,
Finally, uranium itself may seem to be a puzzle: Where did it come
from? What reaction formed it? The universe started with hydrogen; how
did atoms like uranium climb the energy hill? The answer, as I
understand it, is supernova explosions:
The supernova explosion theory is
David Thomson wrote:
[snip]
Does it really surprise you that NSA is involved in VISTA?
They have been involved from the beginning since
Windows 95, only now they are getting an upgrade and you are paying
for it. How else are they going to pay for these black projects?
I've always wondered
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Proof of capturing ambient temperature energy
Michel Jullian wrote:
The highly OU commercial ambient air energy pumping devices I was
talking
Hi Harry,
Thanks for posting the derivation.
This is one of those cases where E=mc^2 appears to be true, because the math
predicts a value that is useful. As I pointed out, however, E=mc^2 is not
always true, such as in the case of nuclear binding and unbinding.
Nuclear fission, regardless of
Hi Paul,
Any thoughts on Linux or Mac?
The government's business is to know what its citizens are doing. You
realize there are computer science divisions of the NSA and CIA, right? Do
you really think they are sitting back and letting new technology defeat
them?
I only know a tiny bit about
Hello Dave,
...
Another false prediction of SR is that it doesn't matter which object is
moving what velocity, since it is believed there is no fixed reference
frame. Yet, when cosmic rays come streaming through the Earth,
the Earth's mass does not approach infinity, either. In fact, there
Hello Dave,
Hi Stephen, [Lawrence]
Finally, uranium itself may seem to be a puzzle: Where did it come
from? What reaction formed it? The universe started with hydrogen; how
did atoms like uranium climb the energy hill? The answer, as I
understand it, is supernova explosions:
The
Howdy Vorts,
Used to be plenty of snooping on the Dime Box Texas telephone system back
when we used hand crank up auto-dialing features. Every snoop in town would
lift up their phone and listen in to the most intimate conversations and
latest gossip.
Can you imagine the size of the building
These days I am more concerned with Big Sister than Big Brother.
Harry
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:55:17 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Finally, uranium itself may seem to be a puzzle: Where did it come
from? What reaction formed it? The universe started with hydrogen; how
did atoms like uranium climb the energy hill? The answer, as I
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:17:12 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Understood. Now, would you like to take a stab at explaining the
electron capture model ?
I believe the basic premise is that a proton temporarily captures an electron
becoming a neutron (with borrowed energy?),
David Thomson wrote:
Hi Harry,
Thanks for posting the derivation.
You're welcome.
This is one of those cases where E=mc^2 appears to be true, because the math
predicts a value that is useful. As I pointed out, however, E=mc^2 is not
always true, such as in the case of nuclear binding
Michel Jullian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Proof of capturing ambient temperature energy
Michel Jullian wrote:
The highly OU commercial ambient air energy
38 matches
Mail list logo
