Jones Beene wrote:
To prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power and a possible threat to
our so-called ally in the Middle East ... hey, with friends like
that, who needs ...
I realize we've been through this Jones, but I think they already are a
nuclear power.
Harry Tuttle,Buddhist
Vortexians;
I sent this letter to Hal Puthoff and received a thank you note.
The Twin Cities Creation Science Association, http://tccsa.tc/ , set up
a meeting with the physicist William Overan last Sunday night.
Bill was one of Otto's (Schmitt) graduate students. Otto told me that
nuclear
Howdy Thomas,
The word picture of the heavens will roll up as a scroll .. hmmm.. An
end view of a rolled up scroll describes a vortex shaped spiral. As one
begans to roll an unfurled scroll the diameter increases. The inverse is
that the area of a single roll increases like a roll of paper
Steven Krivit wrote:
The laboratory protocol for Phase 1 of the Galileo Project is
available for any adult who is willing to sign a liability release.
This policy makes no sense for the following reasons:
1. Mosier-Boss hopes to publish the protocol in a journal soon.
Assuming she has given
Sorry to be so obtuse Robin, do you mean (Hy - Hy)+ with one electron orbiting
around?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 6:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Deuterium analysis
In reply to Michel
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Howdy Thomas,
The word picture of the heavens will roll up as a scroll .. hmmm..
An end view of a rolled up scroll describes a vortex
We see a scroll from the front, so I assume that it would be like a
sheet of paper which rolls up from both ends
Didn't I read
The title of the previous blank message was supposed to be:
The Galileo Project: Those who do not learn from the past . . .
Bill: Let's get rid of this crazy Vo: adding macro. It does not work!
- Jed
But magnets will NOT save the world. Consider this:
There are known recoverable reserves of Rare Earth Elements in the
entire world of approximately 6 million metric tons. Of this REE about
20% is neodymium. According to Sean, he expects to get 0.5 W/cc from
his technology.
The density of
Terry Blanton wrote:
But magnets will NOT save the world. Consider this:
There are known recoverable reserves of Rare Earth Elements in the
entire world of approximately 6 million metric tons. Of this REE about
20% is neodymium. According to Sean, he expects to get 0.5 W/cc from
his
Terry Blanton wrote:
But magnets will NOT save the world. Consider this:
There are known recoverable reserves of Rare Earth Elements in the
entire world of approximately 6 million metric tons. Of this REE about
20% is neodymium. According to Sean, he expects to get 0.5 W/cc from
his technology.
Jed,
Thanks for your thoughts and criticism. I agree with some of what you said.
If someone wants to do this experiment, they can easily figure it out from
published literature.
So, they are free to do so.
Have a nice day.
Steve
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Howdy Thomas,
The word picture of the heavens will roll up as a scroll .. hmmm.. An
end view of a rolled up scroll describes a vortex shaped spiral. As one
begans to roll an unfurled scroll the diameter increases.
If the paper is infinitely thin, you get a spiral in a
Not sure those supply numbers are accurate.
First off, the term: recoverable needs to be listed in the context of
recoverable at a price per kg.
My Oxford source says that abundance of Nd is very high - Nd=40 ppm in
the earths crust... which is surprisingly high - much higher than many
Terry Blanton wrote:
But magnets will NOT save the world. Consider this:
There are known recoverable reserves of Rare Earth Elements in the
entire world of approximately 6 million metric tons. . . .
There is not much in ocean water, either: 3.3 ng/kg. More than Pd or
Au, but not enough to
On 3/21/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure those supply numbers are accurate.
Here's a comprehensive recent report:
http://www.lynascorp.com/content/upload/files/press_releases/BCC_FINAL_REPORT.pdf
http://snipurl.com/1dm8v
See pp 21-22
The figures include the new Mt. Weld
On 3/21/07, Paul Lowrance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or possibly some type of new magnet --
http://www.physorg.com/news84643085.html
A hydrogen magnet would solve the problem!
I think the nanosolar technology will probably dominate.
Terry
On 3/21/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is not much in ocean water, either: 3.3 ng/kg.
Yes, and the problem is that we are already up against the demand
curve with present applications. HEV's use a lot of Nd.
Terry
Steven Krivit wrote:
Thanks for your thoughts and criticism. I agree with some of what you said.
In that case your actions contradict your beliefs.
If someone wants to do this experiment, they can
easily figure it out from published literature.
Wrong. First, it is not easy. Second, the
I think all Steven needs to do is attach a _disclaimer_ to the documents.
Harry
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Steven Krivit wrote:
The laboratory protocol for Phase 1 of the Galileo Project is available for
any adult who is willing to sign a liability release.
This policy makes no sense for the
Harry Veeder wrote:
I think all Steven needs to do is attach a _disclaimer_ to the documents.
Exactly.
- Jed
I wrote, or rather dictated:
This is like saying that anyone is free to replicate one of these
secret protocols for building magnetic motors, or Stanley Meyer's
can that ran on water.
I meant Stanley Meyer's CAR. All macroscopic events have a cause.
This error is caused by Atlanta's high
Good report in places, and weak in others.
But Terry - the numbers in there are far above what you were indicating
in your earlier post, and even then, they manage to leave out some very
large potential deposits. The largest source for Monazite - Madagascar
does not even appear to be
I wrote:
There is some debate about how much of these precious metals are
available elsewhere in the solar system, but I do not think this
matters much. Once you leave the Earth's atmosphere and go to the
moon or an asteroid, you can then use raw solar energy to vaporize
as much low-grade or
As Paul suggests, eventually magnets will be made from synthetic materials,
just as we now have fabric (e.g. polyester) made from synthetic materials.
We won't have to rely on rare earth elements.
Harry
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
But magnets will NOT save the world. Consider
Terry,
On closer re-read of that paper, I see where you got that figure, but
the derivation of it makes no sense at all - the wild assumptions which
were used - and basically they seem to be doing this work to justify the
high projected dollar output of a particular mine which has a mixed REO
On 3/21/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry,
On closer re-read of that paper, I see where you got that figure, but
the derivation of it makes no sense at all - the wild assumptions which
were used - and basically they seem to be doing this work to justify the
high projected dollar
I wrote:
solar system to prospect for precious metals. 300 GW of Ne-powered
rockets is . . .
Oops. Meant Nd-powered. As in Nd-magnet electric rocket, an Ion or
MPD or what-have-you.
Regarding the availability of neodymium (Nd), see the USGS page on rare earths:
Bill: Let's get rid of this crazy Vo: adding macro. It does not work!
- Jed
Agreed, let's make this a 'me too!' thread.
My understanding is that the person who lobbied to have it added has left
anyway.
Since I chewed out Steve Krivit for his wacky ideas about how
research should be directed, it is only fair that I should point out
that his newsletter is pretty darn good, and the videos he is
uploading are excellent. Years ago I tried to get cold fusion
researchers to agree to make this kind
i prefer it. having that tag makes it easier to sort out by my
filters, and get the vo posts out of the junk folder.
On 3/21/07, John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill: Let's get rid of this crazy Vo: adding macro. It does not work!
- Jed
Agreed, let's make this a 'me too!' thread.
My
I recently sent Bill a simpler procmail recipe (as they're
called) for adding the [Vo] tag, and he's going to try it.
I used it for incoming messages before he started adding the tag,
and it always worked fine. (Procmail is the Unix/Linux program for
altering and distributing mail.) Here it
Your post made my point.
It added Re: which because it is after the {Vo} isn't grouped by subject.
Even worse sometimes a second re: gets added as in: [Vo]: Re: Re: Di-Ozone
or even [VO]:Re:[VO] .. Schauberger
But mainly subject deletion which is really bad.
If Mark S Bilk's fix works all the
Stop the ad hominem please.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: No Vo vote
Your post made my point.
It added Re: which because it is after the {Vo} isn't grouped by
I sure hope you're trying to be funny.
On 3/22/07, Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stop the ad hominem please.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: No Vo vote
Actually, John's assessment is correct and there were no ad hominem remarks
made by him. You still seem not to have toned down your smug attitude and
continue to incite negative responses.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Michel Jullian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March
Jed,
At 06:17 PM 3/21/2007 -0400, you wrote:
Since I chewed out Steve Krivit for his wacky ideas about how research
should be directed, it is only fair that I should point out that his
newsletter is pretty darn good, and the videos he is uploading are excellent.
Thank you for your opinions.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:08:31PM +1200, John Berry wrote:
...
for those who want to create a filter for vortex posts
they can just use the To: vortex-l@eskimo.com field
That won't work if the sender puts the list address in the
Cc: or Bcc: line instead of the To: line (unless the list
server
Stop the ad hominem David.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: David Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 1:32 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Re: No Vo vote
Actually, John's assessment is correct and there were no ad hominem remarks
made by him. You
38 matches
Mail list logo
