On 6/30/07, Esa Ruoho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/06/water_vortex_drives_power_plan.html
The *diameter* of the vortex basin is 5 meters.
The *head* - difference between the two water levels - is 1.6 meters.
The turbine produced *50.000 kw/h* in its first year of
On Jul 1, 2007, at 5:51 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On 6/30/07, Esa Ruoho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/06/
water_vortex_drives_power_plan.html
The diameter of the vortex basin is 5 meters.
The head - difference between the two water levels - is 1.6 meters.
The
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 1, 2007, at 5:51 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On 6/30/07, Esa Ruoho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/06/water_vortex_drives_power_plan.html
The diameter of the vortex basin is 5 meters.
The head - difference between the two water levels -
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 1, 2007, at 5:51 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On 6/30/07, Esa Ruoho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/06/water_vortex_drives_power_plan.html
The diameter of the vortex basin is 5 meters.
The head - difference between the two water levels -
On 7/1/07, Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That structure with turbine is easily adapted to driving an underwater pump
for water lifts for irrigation.
Yes.
I am working on a public demonstration of a high efficiency motor
whose torque/load relationship must remain constant. I have
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
There's a lot of talk about the verbiage used in Steorns NDA. I'd
bet this NDA would kill any chance of me patenting any future
successful Free Energy machine.
Hopefully you are aware that anything patentable that you have
created and
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
There's a lot of talk about the verbiage used in Steorns NDA. I'd bet
this NDA would kill any chance of me patenting any future successful
Free Energy machine.
Hopefully you are aware that anything patentable that you
On Jul 1, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
There's a lot of talk about the verbiage used in Steorns NDA. I'd
bet this NDA would kill any chance of me patenting any future
successful Free Energy machine.
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 1, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
There's a lot of talk about the verbiage used in Steorns NDA. I'd
bet this NDA would kill any chance of me patenting any future
successful Free
You should consider:
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/provapp.htm
Terry
On 7/1/07, Paul Lowrance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 1, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
There's a lot of
That's a good idea. Last time I checked the provisional fee was ~$200.
Also there are companies that charge about the same, which they will publish
your work in a paper magazine issue and an online magazine, which legally holds
up in the U.S. court of law.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
Terry
On Jul 1, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Are you saying that if the inventor freely publishes it on the web
that it can actually prevent the inventor from obtaining a patent,
but anyone else can obtain a patent on the invention???
Not necessarily anyone else. If someone else
Terry Blanton wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
That structure with turbine is easily adapted to driving
an underwater pump
for water lifts for irrigation.
Yes.
I am working on a public demonstration of a high efficiency motor
whose torque/load relationship must remain constant. I have
Jed wrote:
Michael Foster wrote:
The heat was detected from the outside of the aluminum tubing, so I'm
not sure that the specific heat of the liquid itself is a factor here.
OTOH, I'm a pretty fair inventor, but a rotten scientist. The heat was
measured in terms of hotter than hell in a
Michael,
I don't think Jed meant anything personal with his comments. You are
first of all a businessman, and have that overriding obligation - ahead
of experimental rigor. He may not have realized that.
However, it would be helpful to others if you could expound, even
anecdotally, on your
15 matches
Mail list logo
