- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 6:11 AM
...
I thought there was a chance it was due to my ISP changing their spam
filter. However, I checked and it is only showing up on vortex
posts. My other email
Horace Heffner wrote:
So some of the mass, 0.45373 MeV/c2, comes from slowing down,
denergizing, the nucleus. This mass is strangely close to the
mass of the electron, 0.506667 MeV/c2.
Curiouser and curiouser.
... and in the big-picture (which does seem to superficially support the
various
Jones wrote:
In any event, perhaps someone (with thick skin and large cajones) should
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cajones
-
1.cajones
Spanish for drawers (as in, the kind in a dresser or desk). This word is
often confused by non-Spanish speakers with cojones (note
Ha! Well don't forget that there is also another connotation for
'drawers' (at least in the USA)...
... but let's just say it was an inadvertent euphemism...
and/or tribute to the likes of Madeline Albright's little tirade against
Castro some years ago ...
Michel Jullian wrote:
Jones
I'm a little surprised at the total lack of attentions Steorn is getting in the
alternative and Free Energy communities. For some time Sean has stated the
Orbo will be demonstrated to the public the first week of July in London.
Most people who follow Steorn news are nearly 100% certain such
From Paul Lowrance
I'm a little surprised at the total lack of attentions Steorn is getting in the
alternative and Free Energy communities.
...
Indeed, the much anticipated STEORN presentation could be of historic
proportions. The event could turn out to be one of the biggest
milestones in
There have been many updates to the gravimagnetic theory paper:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/FullGravimag.pdf
including a possible solution to the Galaxy Rotation Problem on page 24.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
It is a proof-of-principle device. If it actually produces
120 W of anomalous excess power, it does not matter how big the
thing is.
Nothing anomalous about the 120W, it's his input power (from the
solar panels).
Yes, I should have noted that
Jones Beene wrote:
In particle physics, the quark is not longer considered to be a basic
constituent of matter but is now considered to be a lepton which is
located outside of 3-space.
Interesting comment Jones. Robert Bigelow, lately in the news for
launching his own space station, has
Hunt for the Skinwalker
http://www.amazon.com/Hunt-Skinwalker-Science-Confronts-Unexplained/dp/1416505210/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-0980123-1165619?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1183494439sr=8-1
http://snipr.com/1ntou
On 7/3/07, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
In particle physics,
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:34:49 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
--- Robin van Spaandonk
Perhaps one implication is that each that each quark
comprises a pair of particles, each with a mass Pi^5
times that of the electron.
Well...
Don't keep us in suspense...or are we
I wish people would refrain from doing these grand orchestrated
introductions. Two reasons:
1. It might fail, and thereby backfire.
2. It seems like something P. T. Barnum would do, rather than science.
A series of low-key, matter-of-fact demonstrations in the laboratory
would be better.
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 1, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
There's a lot of talk about the verbiage used in Steorns NDA. I'd
bet this NDA would kill any chance of me patenting any future
successful Free
Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wish people would refrain from doing
these grand orchestrated
introductions. Two reasons:
1. It might fail, and thereby backfire.
2. It seems like something P. T. Barnum would do, rather than science.
They are businessmen, trying to make money for
Paul Lowrance wrote:
It's my impression the court merely wants proof of Prior Art.
Perhaps web forums, yahoo google websites, and wikis don't count
as much proof. What if I handed out a few thousand xeroxed papers to
various people?
I do not know anything about patent laws, but if you were
Jed Rothwell wrote:
I wish people would refrain from doing these grand orchestrated
introductions. Two reasons:
1. It might fail, and thereby backfire.
2. It seems like something P. T. Barnum would do, rather than science.
A series of low-key, matter-of-fact demonstrations in the laboratory
Rhong Dhong wrote:
They are businessmen, trying to make money for their investors. They
could publish the plans of the device tomorrow if they didn't mind
seeing their investors lose millions in revenue from licences.
That has no bearing on how they introduce the invention to the pubic.
A
BlankA 4th of July parade, bar-b-q and celebration is held each 4th at Round
Top Texas, the smallest incorporated town ( population 71) in Texas. This is
the longest continued 4th celebration and parade held west of the Mississippi
River and started in 1856 by the local German and Czech
Jed,
I think you may be correct. Edison may have had it right...
We have been pondering the issue with regard to our own technology.
(Anyone interested can see what we will say publicly at this time by reading
what appears on our website: magneticpowerinc.com )
Mark
Magnetic Power Inc.
On
Paul Lowrance wrote:
I agree. Here's my method --
Goal: To freely spread the precise build instructions as quickly as possible:
* Type a short document containing precise details how to build such
a device, encouraging others to replicate such a device for personal
use and/or for sale.
*
On Jul 3, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
It's my impression the court merely wants proof of Prior Art.
Perhaps web forums, yahoo google websites, and wikis don't count
as much proof. What if I handed out a few thousand xeroxed papers
to various people?
I think you should
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 02 Jul 2007 09:40:41 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Good points made by Michel and Horace, as I was heavily influenced in
this thought (at the time I read the Paynter paper) by the Graneau work.
Even now, I am not sure whether their assertion is wrong or right, but
22 matches
Mail list logo
