From William Beaty:
--
THE INTERNATIONAL FORTEAN ORGANIZATION (INFO) presents
FortFest '08 Beyond Belief!
*American Visionary Art Museum (AVAM), Baltimore,MD
47th Conference on Anomalous Phenomena, March 29-30
www.forteans.com
...
This is from:
http://www.newenergytimes.com/tgp/2007TGP/2007TGP-Report.htm
Charles Beaudette on Scientific Skepticism
A few years ago, Charles Beaudette said, I was having lunch with
Richard Oriani and Xing Zhong Li. At one point, I was discussing with
Li one of his experiments, and Oriani
--- Horace Robin,
In reply to Jones Beene's message of 2004:
(always fun to revisit the archives)
If you have no gammas and want to invoke phonon or
lattice coupling, then first set up an experiment
where you can show that nuclear lattice coupling is
high probability and happens most of the
John, I expect the lack of response is due to the difficulty of and
enormous time consumed by explaining and resolving these kinds of
issues, especially without quantification. This difficult in
generating interest is compounded by the negative inventor syndrome
attitude you seem to
The Odd Transformer notes with photos are in pdf form at:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/OddTransNotes.pdf
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Jan 29, 2000
I'm going to build an odd transformer like that shown in Fig. 1
below, using 6 steel washers, 5 outer diameter, as shown. The steel
washers make for poor transformer cores so it should only handle only
a few watts in the secondary, even if the primary windings were
wrapped
The Odd Transformer post got held because it is in HTML and thus
ended up over 40K. I'll send it again as text, but the ascii
drawings might be messed up due to line length. Anyway it is
available at:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/OddTransNotes.pdf
Though much larger due to the
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:43:51 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
I would like to hear why you would expect 12 MeV alphas predicted by
a theory as the principal reaction path to *not* be a major problem
with the theory.
[snip]
It might or might not be, depending. First, in
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:22:57 -0900:
Hi,
The message quoted below was not the message to which I was referring. This
message had as subject Re: Fw: The myth of lattice coupling and He ratios,
while the message I was referring to had as subject Another possible
On 2/22/08, Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
negative inventor syndrome attitude you seem to emote in your post,
Please clarify. 'Inventor syndrome' can refer to various inventor issues
and I'm not quite sure I appreciate how 'inventor syndrome' would be
different to 'negative inventor
Last night on the BBC news they reported the then breaking news that the
American missile had hit the spy satellite. I couldn't help but smile,
Parksie was wrong yet again. Long term Vortexians will recall his
attacks on the antimissile system. It was a waste of money, a government
boondoggle,
11 matches
Mail list logo
