[Vo]:New ENERGY TIMES (tm) May 10, 2008 -- Issue #28

2008-05-12 Thread Steven Krivit
49fe8670.jpg Original reporting on leading-edge energy research and technologies May 10, 2008 -- Issue #28 EDITORIALS AND OPINION 1. http://newenergytimes.com/news/2008/NET28.htm#FROMEDOpinion: Letter to http://newenergytimes.com/news/2008/NET28.htm#FROMEDNatuurwetenschappen en Techniek

[Vo]:Water purifier

2008-05-12 Thread Nick Palmer
This spiral pseudo-vortex water purifier might be of interest to Richard Texas Tea Macaulay... http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/20754/?a=f

[Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

2008-05-12 Thread OrionWorks
For those who have a propensity towards understanding lawyer-speak. Jones? Mr. Carrell? http://lawbites.com/blacklight-power-sci-fi-science-rejected-by-uk-ipo/ http://tinyurl.com/5wwbvp and

Re: [Vo]:New ENERGY TIMES (tm) May 10, 2008 -- Issue #28

2008-05-12 Thread Jones Beene
Heads-Up: There is an article tucked away near the end of this issue which could be of extreme importance in a variety of non-obvious ways ... (like ultra-high efficiency electrolysis) : 15. Carbon Arc Meets Quantum Rabbit By Steven B. Krivit This article discusses possible nuclear

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

2008-05-12 Thread Edmund Storms
After reading the decision of the patent examiner, my impression is that the patent was rejected for good reason. The rejection argument is not that the theory is wrong but that Mills is trying to patent a theory and its application to calculating electron states. This would be like having a

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

2008-05-12 Thread Mike Carrell
- Original Message - From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:40 AM Subject: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO snip What I'd like to know is whether UK IPO's final decision was due to a difference in

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

2008-05-12 Thread OrionWorks
Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP would attempt to patent a theoretical process involving the calculation of electron states via software simulations. Is this latest battle related to Randy's Millsian Molecular Modeling endeavors, or is this a follow-up to recent

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

2008-05-12 Thread Harry Veeder
Can theories be copyrighted? Harry On 12/5/2008 4:37 PM, OrionWorks wrote: Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP would attempt to patent a theoretical process involving the calculation of electron states via software simulations. Is this latest battle related

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

2008-05-12 Thread Mike Carrell
- Original Message - From: OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 5:37 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO Reading Ed and Mike's comments makes me wonder why in the world BLP would attempt to patent a

[Vo]:Gasoline prices...

2008-05-12 Thread Kyle Mcallister
...or Petrol, depending on from where you come. $3.87/U.S. Gallon here in western NY. Crazy, considering that when I moved here six years ago it was about $1.50. Yay-big increase. Now, as I was in a somewhat contemplative mood earlier, I decided to sit back and see how this really affected me.

Re: [Vo]:Blacklight Power: Sci-fi science rejected by UK-IPO

2008-05-12 Thread R C Macaulay
Howdy Mike, And thus we gain another glimpse of the new century strategies being used to capture revenue streams derived from intellectual property... or should I say properties. Actually the field remains open to a new legimate form of pirating ownership before discovery. hmmm Google

Re: [Vo]:New ENERGY TIMES (tm) May 10, 2008 -- Issue #28

2008-05-12 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Steven Krivit's message of Sun, 11 May 2008 23:10:06 -0800: Hi, [snip] 1. http://newenergytimes.com/news/2008/NET28.htm#FROMEDOpinion: Fusion of deuterium into helium-4 gives a yield of 17 MeV. No it doesn't. It gives a yield of 23.85 MeV. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk The

Re: [Vo]:New ENERGY TIMES (tm) May 10, 2008 -- Issue #28

2008-05-12 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Steven Krivit's message of Sun, 11 May 2008 23:10:06 -0800: Hi, [snip] 1. http://newenergytimes.com/news/2008/NET28.htm#FROMEDOpinion: A study that costs no more than one industrial windmill or a B2-stealth bomber can ask and answer crucial questions within a year. Somehow I

Re: [Vo]:New ENERGY TIMES (tm) May 10, 2008 -- Issue #28

2008-05-12 Thread Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Steven Krivit's message of Sun, 11 May 2008 23:10:06 -0800: Hi, I wrote: 1. http://newenergytimes.com/news/2008/NET28.htm#FROMEDOpinion: A study that costs no more than one industrial windmill or a B2-stealth bomber can ask and answer crucial questions within a year. Somehow

Re: [Vo]:New ENERGY TIMES (tm) May 10, 2008 -- Issue #28

2008-05-12 Thread thomas malloy
Steven Krivit wrote: Excellent posting Steven! Is John Bockris still alive? Do you have contact information? --- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---