In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Mon, 8 Dec 2008 20:19:26 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Has anyone considered that if C12 were converted to C13, the 4.9 MeV
of energy released would break any chemical bond the C12 had within
the compound as well as many other chemical bonds in the vicinity?
Such
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:33:50 -0800 (PST):
Hi Jones,
[snip]
One suggestion is that most of the excess was borrowed in advance, in the QM
sense, to convert a proton into a virtual neutron.
Jones
I have already pointed out that this just isn't so. The energy
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:30:31 -0600 (CST):
Hi,
[snip]
answer. It isn't that they can't hit the floor with their hat, their
agenda is to miss it.
[snip]
Well of course it is. At least one aspect of there function in life is to be a
deliberate sideshow. A form of
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0808/0808.3316v1.pdf
Testing spooky action at a distance
D. Salart, A. Baas, C. Branciard, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden
Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva,
20, Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine,
CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
August 25, 2008
In science, one
On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
- Original Message
From: Edmund Storms
When C12 is converted to C13 by addition of a neutron, the following
mass change occurs:
12.000 + 1.0086649 = 13.0033548, which represent a loss of mass
equal to 0.0053101 AMU. This is
When C12 is converted to C13 by addition of a neutron, the following
mass change occurs:
12.000 + 1.0086649 = 13.0033548, which represent a loss of mass
equal to 0.0053101 AMU. This is equal to 4.95 MeV. The mechanism does
not matter. If C12 is the starting material and C13 is the
Ed,
Well I think that we now have honed-down the differing points-of-view to Planck
time g
You seem to be saying that even if a transmuton exists, it becomes a real
unbound neutron (high mass) prior to becoming a bound (stable average mass)
neutron.
In contrast, I am suggesting that it never
From Jones,
...
In contrast, I am suggesting that it never becomes an unbound
neutron; and instead appears ab initio as a bound (stable mass)
particle without ever going through the stage of real neutron
so there is no (or only slight) additional energy to dissipate.
Jones
Where is it
Jones Beene wrote:
Ed,
Well I think that we now have honed-down the differing points-of-view
to Planck time g
You seem to be saying that even if a transmuton exists, it becomes a
real unbound neutron (high mass) prior to becoming a bound (stable
average mass) neutron.
In contrast, I
On Dec 9, 2008, at 11:26 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Ed,
Well I think that we now have honed-down the differing points-of-
view to Planck time g
Indeed. But let me add one more argument. We agree that C13 differs
from C12 by the presence of one additional neutron. Therefore, for a
C12 to
What a commentary on how things sometimes get done, and the need for
the reforms in progress and even more.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/
10illinois_complaint.pdf
http://tinyurl.com/5adf8s
Interesting that the Secretary of Energy is noted as the highest paid
The newspapers say this is still at the rumor stage and Chu has not
yet been definitely selected.
Chu is quoted regarding Mills' and BLP : It is extremely unlikely
that this is real, and I feel sorry for the people who are backing
this. Actually, I tend to agree but not for his reasons. I
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 12:30 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mizuno comments on CH molecules, and on his personal
situation
- Original Message
From: Edmund Storms
When C12 is converted to C13 by addition of a
On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:11 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
When C12 is converted to C13 by addition of a neutron, the
following mass change occurs:
12.000 + 1.0086649 = 13.0033548, which represent a loss of mass
equal to 0.0053101 AMU. This is equal to 4.95 MeV. The mechanism
does not
On Dec 9, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The newspapers say this is still at the rumor stage and Chu has not
yet been definitely selected.
Chu is quoted regarding Mills' and BLP : It is extremely unlikely
that this is real, and I feel sorry for the people who are backing
this.
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:11 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
When C12 is converted to C13 by addition of a neutron, the following
mass change occurs:
12.000 + 1.0086649 = 13.0033548, which represent a loss of mass
equal to 0.0053101 AMU. This is equal to 4.95 MeV. The
Jed Rothwell wrote:
The newspapers say this is still at the rumor stage and Chu has not yet
been definitely selected.
Chu is quoted regarding Mills' and BLP : It is extremely unlikely that
this is real, and I feel sorry for the people who are backing this.
Actually, I tend to agree but
Horace Heffner wrote:
Oh, I earlier neglected to mention that the following is interesting
in regards to conversations of ROD BLAGOJEVICH the governor and
JOHN HARRIS with others about the potential trade of choice for the
open Illinois US Senator seat in return for the President-Elect
placing
Apparently all spontaneous nuclear reactions are exothermic. This is
required because a nuclear process cannot obtain the required large
amount of energy from the local environment fast enough. In contrast,
a chemical reaction is much slower and is satisfied with energy that
can be stolen
The shape-power material has significance, I thought. Did anybody take
note of the helical energy structure at the top of the pyramid that
was pictured therein? Or more importantly, know of it's origins. I've
documented this in fluids, so the field sturcture will be of specific
use
Zak
Edmund Storms wrote:
Apparently all spontaneous nuclear reactions are exothermic. This is
required because a nuclear process cannot obtain the required large
amount of energy from the local environment fast enough.
Well, my understanding is extremely limited, but I gather that
nuclear
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:04:33 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Apparently all spontaneous nuclear reactions are exothermic. This is
required because a nuclear process cannot obtain the required large
amount of energy from the local environment fast enough. In contrast,
a
On Dec 9, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms wrote:
Apparently all spontaneous nuclear reactions are exothermic. This
is required because a nuclear process cannot obtain the required
large amount of energy from the local environment fast enough.
Well, my understanding
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:11 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
When C12 is converted to C13 by addition of a neutron, the
following mass change occurs:
12.000 + 1.0086649 = 13.0033548, which
On Dec 9, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:11 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
When C12 is converted to C13 by addition of a neutron, the
following mass change
In 2002 Infinite Energy published a paper What is Missing in Les Case’s
Catalytic Fusion - it did not mention phenanthrene. No surprise there.
Maybe just maybe - especially if Mizuno is even partly replicated, it will be
time to revisit the Case experiments but with phenanthrene as a featured
I don't see any reforms on the horizon as yet. The horse thief's union
meeting, held at the Dime Box saloon, were appalled at learning there were
crooked politicians in Illinois.
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Vortex-L vortex-l@eskimo.com
That's funny!
How 'bout Rhode Island?
Terry
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:47 PM, R C Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see any reforms on the horizon as yet. The horse thief's union
meeting, held at the Dime Box saloon, were appalled at learning there were
crooked politicians in
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 5:35 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mizuno comments on CH molecules, and on his personal
situation
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:04:33 -
0700:Hi,
[snip]
Apparently all spontaneous nuclear
On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:56 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
[snip]
How can anyone, especially those that haunt this particular forum,
where the emphasis is on LENR or many types which are seen in the
literature - possibly expect this unique Mizuno reaction to
resemble prior hot fusion in any specific
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 9:16 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mizuno comments on CH molecules, and on his personal
situation
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2008 5:35 pm
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 09 Dec 2008 21:25:06 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
oops i mean if He4 splits into D + D wouldn't that be endothermic if the
reverse
process is exothermic?
Yes, but given the energy requirement, that's one of the biggest ifs I've ever
seen. ;)
Regards,
Robin van
Whoa,
Let's not kill the goose that laid the golden lottery ticket. You shut down
Rhode Island and poof goes the lottery system nationwide.
GTech would have to lay off workers.http://www.lotterypost.com/news/182035
Richard
Terry wrote,
That's funny!
How 'bout Rhode Island?
Terry
On Tue,
The Chicago Democrat machine could give the Godfather lessons in how to
steal armed with just a briefcase...
R C Macaulay wrote:
I don't see any reforms on the horizon as yet. The horse thief's union
meeting, held at the Dime Box saloon, were appalled at learning
there were crooked
Zachary Jones wrote:
The shape-power material has significance, I thought. Did anybody
take note of the helical energy structure at the top of the pyramid
that was pictured therein?
Of course
Or more importantly, know of it's origins. I've documented this in
fluids, so the field
35 matches
Mail list logo
