Jed has shot from the hip, unfairly.
Steve's visit to interview Fleischmann at his house, prior to both of them
then going on to the Rome conference, was organised and agreed over three
months previously. After everything was finalised, and very close to the
interview date, it transpired that
From Abd:
At 09:29 AM 10/12/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
See:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10372233-1.html
Cool. I assume that the radioisotope decays with emission of very
low-penetrating charged-particle radiation. As long as you don't
swallow it, this should be quite safe! And
Nick Palmer wrote:
Jed has shot from the hip, unfairly.
Not exactly. Martin and his daughter told me their side of the story.
Steve decided that as there was to be no interview we might as well
buy Martin some flowers and a get well card. We delivered these in
person and were met by
At 08:45 AM 10/13/2009, you wrote:
From Abd:
Cool. I assume that the radioisotope decays with emission of very
low-penetrating charged-particle radiation. As long as you don't
swallow it, this should be quite safe! And eating batteries isn't
particularly good for your health anyway.
How
At 07:52 AM 10/13/2009, Nick Palmer wrote:
Jed has shot from the hip, unfairly.
I thought long and hard about whether or not to
comment on this, it's practically a lose-lose
situation. On the one hand, I have a great deal
of respect for Mr. Krivit, he's done a great deal
to benefit the
Looks very promising. What are the obstacles to get thisbattery in public
use? I find debate meaningless if there are like legal constraints. In that
case the legal constraingt should be addressed first otherwise a
technical/scientific discussion becomes meaningless. A lot of effective
physics is
At 10:03 AM 10/13/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
When Sheila told you Martin did not wish to see you, that should
have been the end of the story. You should have handed over the
flowers with your best wishes, gone home, said nothing and done
nothing. This is the family's business only. You should
At 10:03 AM 10/13/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote:
As it happens I suffer from neurological problems similar to
Fleischmann's. That is obvious to anyone who meets me. It is
annoying but not debilitating. I have never made a big deal about it
and if it bothers someone they can go jump in a lake. I am
Dear Vortex,
Jed Rothwell and Abd ul-Rahman_Lomax have expressed themselves with a great
deal of rage and outrage that I reported that Martin is suffering from
Parkinson's disease and diabetes.
Despite their mudslinging and pontification (a popular word here in Italy),
the fact is that
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
NORTHAMPTON, MASSACHUSETTS, October 13, 2009. Observer Abd ul-Rahman
Lomax, of Lomax Design Associates, today read the above comment from
Jed Rothwell, which could explain Rothwell's sometimes erratic
behavior. As admitted, Rothwell has difficulty with a pen, which
Steven Krivit wrote:
Jed Rothwell and Abd ul-Rahman_Lomax have expressed themselves with
a great deal of rage and outrage . . .
Disgust, not outrage.
Despite their mudslinging and pontification (a popular word here in
Italy), the fact is that Martin's health challenges are far from
ABD and Jed. You are both completely failing to digest the point that this
interview at Fleishmann's house was arranged and agreed months in advance.
Jed and ABD's's bluster, imputing invasion of privacy, is ridiculous. If
someone turns up for a scheduled interview it is not an invasion of
Nick Palmer wrote:
JR: Fleischmann is under no obligation to meet with Krivit or
anyone else. He is under no obligation to give a reason why he does
not wish to speak with Krivit. Yes he is if he agreed to it - even
if Steve lived in the same town. That flights, travel, expense and a
lot of
My sister sent me this link under the Subject: huh? wtf?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/science/space/13lhc.html
QUOTE:
A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the
hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the
collider, might be so abhorrent
Jed,
As before, I thank you for your opinions. And certainly Bill Beatty is wise
and cool-headed enough to notice that I have not made personal attacks
against you, but you have against me.
Steve
At 11:27 AM 10/13/2009, you wrote:
Steven Krivit wrote:
Jed Rothwell and Abd
Frankly, if I were Bill Beaty, I would delete this whole thread and ban
Krivit if he does not stop this nonsense.
Jed,
I never thought I'd see the day that you would encourage censorship, either
post facto, or pre-emptively.
Steve
Steven Krivit wrote:
Jed,
I never thought I'd see the day that you would encourage censorship,
either post facto, or pre-emptively.
Then you haven't been paying attention. I have often done this, such
as when people posted rude messages or highly off-topic stuff.
This is the first time I
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Sounds like self deprecating humor to me. A comment of the
difficulty of finding
the Higgs boson (BTW you can search for a very long time for something that
doesn't exist).
You would think so, but these people are serious.
- Jed
At 03:44 PM 10/13/2009, Steven Krivit wrote:
Dear Vortex,
Jed Rothwell and Abd ul-Rahman_Lomax have expressed themselves with
a great deal of rage and outrage that I reported that Martin is
suffering from Parkinson's disease and diabetes.
No. And if you think that's what happened, Steve,
Personally, I wonder if the scientific community is nearly incapable of
progress because it's dominated by undiagnosed Aspergers and related
syndromes. Instead of being fascinated by shiny objects, they obsess about
assorted technicalities and tend to be puzzled by common social demands. Hint,
At 03:51 PM 10/13/2009, Nick Palmer wrote:
ABD and Jed. You are both completely failing to digest the point
that this interview at Fleishmann's house was arranged and agreed
months in advance. Jed and ABD's's bluster, imputing invasion of
privacy, is ridiculous. If someone turns up for a
This link is for Harry;
Physicists Measure Elusive 'Persistent Current' That Flows Forever
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091011071349.htm
Doesn't sound like anything is ever going to be powered by it.
Ron
--On Wednesday, October 14, 2009 8:28 AM +1100 mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
On a completely personal note, I would not want to give the
impression that I have Parkinson's. I have no idea what it is, and
neither do the doctors. They call it essential tremor, where
essential is medical jargon meaning 'built-in, always there,' or
'we don't have a clue what causes it.'
At 05:58 PM 10/13/2009, Chris Zell wrote:
Personally, I wonder if the scientific community is nearly incapable
of progress because it's dominated by undiagnosed Aspergers and
related syndromes. Instead of being fascinated by shiny objects,
they obsess about assorted technicalities and tend to
At 06:20 PM 10/13/2009, Ron Wormus wrote:
This link is for Harry;
Physicists Measure Elusive 'Persistent Current' That Flows Forever
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091011071349.htm
Doesn't sound like anything is ever going to be powered by it.
Ron
Yeah. Persistent Current
sigh
Terry
--- On Tue, 10/13/09, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have
suggested that
the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to
produce with the
collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation
would ripple
backward through
Kyle Mcallister wrote:
Unfalsifiability. We have gone from a science, to a religion.
I agree in general this is true of high energy physics, but to give credit
where it is due, one of the physicist who proposed this did propose some
tests, statistical in nature. Details were not given and I
I seem to recall that essential tremor is eased by alcoholic beverages
whereas Parkinson's is not. Anyway, it's a good excuse to buy some wine...
Nick Palmer
On the side of the Planet - and the people - because they're worth it
Blogspot - Sustainability and stuff according to Nick Palmer
Jed wrote:
Fleischmann told me he has had the problem for a long time.
I'm outraged, how could you be so insensitive to reveal in a public forum
personal health details
that someone told you!!!
Me thinks this touches an emotional 'button' for both Jed and ABD... And that
comment Jed made
This sort of thing makes me wonder about scientists, or the scientific
'process'...
For those of you more familiar with the details of atomic/molecular physics,
can you please explain
why you would even think that the magnetic orientation/properties of copper
atoms in covalent bonds
would be
hi steve.. well, so far it seems that allmagnetics have done a really poor
photoshop job:
http://www.allmagnetics.com/images/device/probe3.gif
look very carefully as to where the steorn logo-type and text would be.
http://www.steorn.com/images/lab-hallprobe01.jpg
yep. smudged. the question, of
32 matches
Mail list logo
