Talk about nuking the leftoversIs Corning Gorilla Glass ( Alumino-silicate
glass ) good for labware ? I wonder.
http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Feature-Article.htm?Info=0109606From=News
Hoyt Stearns
Scottsdale, Arizona US
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
Jones Beene wrote:
The thing that I find confusing in 2010 - is that Dennis Cravens . .
. seems to be saying, at least in the present tense, that the beads
ONLY worked reliably with deuterium.
No, he is not saying that.
- Jed
I honestly do not understand much about economics or employment.
Accepted theories seem contradictory. For example, economists are
always telling us Americans need to save more, then when people save
more -- as they are doing now -- economists say we need to spend more
to stimulate the
I spent an appreciable fraction of my career in the early days of robotics
with mechanization and robotics applications at RCA. Naïve chatter about
human-less culture and artificial intelligence overlooks fundamental things.
1] brains are fundamentally different from computers. Brains learn, can
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
JB: The thing that I find confusing in 2010 - is that Dennis Cravens
seems to be saying, at least in the present tense, that the beads ONLY
worked reliably with deuterium.
JR: No, he is not saying that.
Well, here is the Craven's EXACT quote
Mike Carrell wrote:
I spent an appreciable fraction of my career in
the early days of robotics with mechanization
and robotics applications at RCA. Naïve chatter
about human-less culture and artificial
intelligence overlooks fundamental things. 1]
brains are fundamentally different from
Jones Beene wrote:
Well, here is the Craven's EXACT quote from your original post:
DC: Realize that almost all the reasonable work with the beads that gave
much
heat were either heavy water or with 10%+ D2O after they were loaded with
D2O originally in their formation.
Sorry, I missed that.
At 08:17 PM 8/10/2010, Rich Murray wrote:
George Miley trained Scott Little in person in Nov 1996 on use of
costly CETI RIFEX kit -- Little had many discussions during his runs
-- no hints re using D2O not H2O: Rich Murray 2010.08.10
Rich, there is lots of evidence that the conditions where
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
I think the role of deuterium is unclear. But the fact that hydrogen does
not poison the reaction has to mean something. Right? Don't ask me what!
Ask 3
theoreticians and you will get 5 answers.
Well - one of the reasons is fairly obvious from
Jones Beene wrote:
If loading was complete at the end of the plating stage, and only D2 was
absorbed, then this would tend to keep any later poisoning minimal, but
progressive - even when light water was used during the electrolysis.
This goes along with Craven's observation of progressive
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:47:53 -0700:
Hi,
The cross section of the D-D reaction is much higher than for p-D or p-Ni, so it
seems reasonable that more D-D reactions are likely to occur, and would be
responsible for the majority of the excess heat.
If the energy is
Mark Goldes wrote:
The Brooklyn Project: see www.aesopinstitute.com includes the statement:
That's dot-org, not dot-com. Direct link:
http://www.aesopinstitute.org/the-brooklyn-project.html
- Jed
12 matches
Mail list logo
