Hello group,
I just found this in the comments section in the Swedish edition of Ny
Teknik's last article on Rossi's Energy Catalyzer (by the way, lots of
information and interesting insights can be found there!):
Dear all, I have been reading your discussions here in vortex-l for a while
and I have been appreciating it a lot. I don't know a great deal about the
matters you are discussing, but Swedish is my mother tongue and there
certainly has been a lot of interesting information in the Swedish tech
On 2011-04-09 12:51, Göran Crafte wrote:
[...]
google-translation of the Swedish text that There are many scientists
who criticise Sven that he even has sexual relations with the
experiment! The Swedish word which is used in the text is beblanda
which should be translated to mix with or
On 2011-04-08 23:20, Jed Rothwell wrote:
On April 8, Rossi wrote in his blog: . . . yesterday we signed a very
important contract in the USA.
More info:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473
* * *
Dr Rossi,
Are you able to tell us any more regarding the nature of the contract
The Rossi patent application has two x-ray spectrograms. Although they could
have been altered, these have been analyzed by comparison with known
spectral wavelengths. The elements identified by this method include Ni, Sn,
Zn, Cu, Zr, and others. Notably, no chromium is seen.
Copper with tin is
It also offers and explanation for why EM radiation can accelerate
nuclear decay:
On 2011-04-06 18:51, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Hello group,
A *very* interesting (revealing many previously unknown details, to tell
the truth I'm not sure if he was supposed to disclose them all)
three-part audio interview in italian to Sergio Focardi by a local web
radio has been submitted here:
Hello Mattia,
When using a flow of 6.47 l/hour = 1.8 cc/ sec, and a temperature rise of
30degrC in 180 seconds (from the curve in the article = is 0.15 degr C/sec) the
thermal power would be only: 1.8cc x 4.2 J/gr degC x 0.15 = 1.13 W.
I agree with you that when 300W is used the temperature
I agree with you that when 300W is used the temperature rise will be: 300W /
1.8 x 4.2 J/gr degrC = 40 degr/ sec.
It's not 40 degr/sec.
It's 40 degress.
1.8cc = 1.8 g.
Flow is 1.8 g/s
1.8 g/s * 4.2 J/(g*K) * 40 K = 300 J/s = 300 watt
From: P.J van Noorden
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 4:36
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:57 AM, SHIRAKAWA Akira
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh my goodness!
I should have checked better before copy/pasting or at least only provide
Google Translate links. Unfortunately posted messages can't be deleted. I'll
remember about possible issues with machine
Hmmm ... the model also seems to address cluster hydrogen which is a
surprise
http://books.google.com/books?id=7E6CqqLCLdYCpg=PA61dq=Brightsen+cluster+h
ydrogenhl=enei=BHagTZvuLJHKiAKPysTfCwsa=Xoi=book_resultct=resultresnum
=1ved=0CDUQ6AEwAA
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
It
To sell the energy . . . but not the ECat? A disgruntled BLP
stockholder? :-)
T
So they are not accusing him of having sexual relations with the experiment?
Shoot. I'm disappointed. I liked it better that way.
Perhaps you should ask Google to translate it, and then go to the
translation and make this correction. I do that from time to time with
Japanese to English
Ah. Now he says he will not be able to announce the identity of the customer
for months.
That's a shame. Here I was hoping to read it in the Monday Business Section
of the newspapers.
Messages from his blog:
Dear Craig:
The Customer of us is a kind of Customer you need to have a written
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hmmm ... the model also seems to address cluster hydrogen which is a
surprise
http://books.google.com/books?id=7E6CqqLCLdYCpg=PA61dq=Brightsen+cluster+h
Ofcourse. degr/sec is a typo.
But do you agree that if the temperature rise of a waterflow of 6.47 W/h is 30
degr/180sec( 0.15 degr/sec) the thermal power needed is only 1.13 W?
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Mattia Rizzi
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 09,
Absolutely not. It's a flow.
Water get in and get out. It's not a closed container of water.
With 1 watt you can rise, when dynamic transients go away, an half degree!
1 watt = 1 J/s
1 J/s = 1.8 g/s * 4.2 J/(g*K) * deltaT
deltaT = 0.1 kelvin (= 0.1 celsius)
If you don't trust me, read the
Re the samples- how has been separated and jidden the famous catalyst?.
Perhaps it is Nickel e-Nitrogen Telluride (abbreviated in italian as NieNTe)
or something that reacts with the impurities at the start of the reaction.
I think the E-cat is so efficient because a great part of the Ni powder
Google translation of Focardi interview [ states]
There are no neutrons. Questa è una fortuna, perché essendo un fenomeno
nucleare uno se li aspetta. This is fortunate, because it is a nuclear
phenomenon if one is waiting for them. Per fortuna non ci sono perché il
nucleo del nickel è una buca
Jones wrote:
Micrograms, actually. Perhaps you only need a few atoms
thickness on the nickel surface.
In fact it might work better that way, since the monatomic
hydrogen splits and keeps on going into the interstices
a few atoms down, where it densifies ...
Terry Blanton wrote:
Ok, ok, I'm
Hello Mattia,
Ofcourse, you are right. I made a mistake.
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Mattia Rizzi
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Problems with energy calculation Rossi device
Absolutely not. It's a flow.
Water
On 2011-04-09 17:37, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ah. Now he says he will not be able to announce the identity of the
customer for months.
More related info. It looks like we'll have to wait until October, after
all:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360cpage=14#comments
* * *
1) You
In reply to Craig Haynie's message of Sat, 09 Apr 2011 00:41:56 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Not sure what I can do. Should I go knock on the door? :)
Craig
Yes! Ask when you would be able to buy one. :)
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
Hi,
Uhum, typo?
Shouldn't this be: Cu-65 and Cu-63 ?
Kind regards,
MoB
On 9-4-2011 5:13, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I have determined the exact number and types of nucleon clusters that
must be involved for the two isotopes used by Rossi, Ni-62 and Ni-64.
The Brightsen Model predicts low energy
Believe it or not, but I have recently determined the ' Monsters from the
ID' are in-fact Aliens, which of course is based on an overall natural
instinctive reaction from down-to-earth human-beings who've witnessed
first-hand
the occupants of Advanced Vehicle/Crafts. The opposite may also be
A new version is up at
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_frames_v316.php
a) I added the new Swedish interview -comments link
b) I added some new fake methods -- particularly Peter van Noorden's water
bypass and a couple of quibbles from the Randi forum
c) I've reorganized to use frames,
SHIRAKAWA Akira shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
More related info. It looks like we'll have to wait until October, after
all:
He has hinted that it may be sooner than October, but the decision to go
public is in the hands of the company he is dealing with. I kind of hope
that an increasing
Still waiting for a human translation but it seems clear Focardi is saying
the resultant copper is NOT the natural ratio of isotopes!
Google translation of Focardi radio interview on Apr 5
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=nprev=_thl=enie=UTF-8layout=2e
In reply to froarty's message of Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:54:29 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The natural isotope ratio of Cu63 to Cu65 is 2.235. The ratio that Rossi -
Focardi report in their paper is 1.6, which means that the ratio of Cu65 to Cu
63 has *increased* beyond natural, implying a preference for the
It is strange that the Swedes did not mention in the NYtek artcile the
difference between their results and the focardi-rossi results.
Harry
- Original Message
From: mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, April 10, 2011 1:29:03 AM
Subject: Re:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sat, 9 Apr 2011 22:54:22 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Perhaps it hasn't been brought to their attention? Might make an interesting
question.
It is strange that the Swedes did not mention in the NYtek artcile the
difference between their results and the
31 matches
Mail list logo
