I would wager that the reason Mills hasn't got a commercial device, after 20
years and $60M, is
because his theory is flawed...
-Mark
_
From: Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 9:46 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Rossi
The reason is, in my opinion, that is very difficult to achieve
a CONTINUOUS generation of energy- see my paper
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/04/questions-preparing-swot-analysis-of-ni.html
what
conditions are necessary for a new source of energy.
But I think this year (good for new
On 05/14/2011 09:37 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From Mauro:
...
Most probably, the reason is comets are charged bodies.
The electric field of the comet interacts with the electric
field of the Sun, and a CME occurs. The electric interaction
is also the reason for
On 05/14/2011 06:12 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
Superrotation is shear flow on gas planets and stars and it requires an
explanation since there appears to be no force or stress to drive them.
Recently I came up with the following idea after having tried two others
with limited success.
Assume that
On 05/14/2011 06:12 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
Superrotation is shear flow on gas planets and stars and it requires an
explanation since there appears to be no force or stress to drive them.
Recently I came up with the following idea after having tried two others
with limited success.
Assume that
Dear Friends,
Excuse me and please don't consider that
kind of spamming- - please read my websearch
newsletter INFORMAVOREs SUNDAY- today
I have published issue 455; and *please promote*
i*t by any means Internet-wide*. My ambition is
to provide as many people possible with serious
valuable,
What an eclectic collection! Did you compile them yourself or were
some recommended to you?
T
-Original Message-
From: Terry to Peter:
What an eclectic collection! Did you compile them yourself or were some
recommended to you?
I got sidetracked at the start ... which brought into focus the paradigm
shift of group mind - in the context of the power of the internet to
instantly
Dear Terry,
as you see this is weekly issue No 455, till No 437 it was in Romanian with
the same columns Almost 9 years of continuous publication. The star of my
blog Ego Out- now.
I am writing it alone- my selection, using many sources.
(subscriptions or not. Discoveries.)
It is a great
Dear Jones,
You are discussing about a rich area of subjects- the newsletter is one of
the components of the blog, formerly
it was a part of a newsletter INFO KAPPA that was property of UPC ROMANIA
(in the US Liberty Global)- an Internet Service Provider. In my editorials I
have developed my
Jone sez:
...
The immensity of this paradigm shift in group-mind is that even
though 98% of the World has not yet caught onto what is happening
in this field...
I think you are being too kind! A present I suspect the percentage is
probably closer to around 99.%.
Still, there is every
Peter,
Sunday's Sermon
Following up on Mr. Beene's comment, I have often subscribed to a belief
that the development of the Internet may very well be ushering in the first
stages of a new sentient species that may soon dominate our planet within a
mere couple of thousand years, a species known
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473cpage=10#comment-39113
Bjorn Genborg
May 15th, 2011 at 6:23 AM
Mr. Rossi,
Regarding controlling capabilities (regulating) of your device; How dynamic can
the power production be adjusted? For example, if a E-cat is in operation,
producing 2,5
[quote] Part2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oD81qF-cIIcNR=1
Now, this is interesting:
The guy (a patent attorney) asks why in the patent there is no mention of
the catalyst, while he now states that there is a catalyst. The guy next
points out that IF there is a catalyst and the catalyst is
Cover: http://www.scientificamerican.com/media/cover/cover_2011-05.jpg
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=radical-energy-solutions
(subscription or paper copy needed)
Cover:
https://subscribe.hearstmags.com/circulation/popularmechanics/images/pop_cvr-reg.jpg
I renamed this thread cuz I'd like to hear opinions as to WHY an engineer
succeeded where ALL the
scientists failed in optimizing the excess heat and controllability of whatever
this reaction is???
In our conversation about Mills/BLP, Peter wrote:
His theory is OK, verified by experiment.
On 2011-05-15 21:44, Axil Axil wrote:
[...]
Levi reply:
Please note that he is professor Sergio Focardi, not Levi.
Cheers,
S.A.
How is (home-based) Solar Energy not free??? The real question is whether it
shall remain so: Some of us are already paying for the water we pump out of our
own land, (and put back via the drainfield in our septic system which recycles
the water so that it does not even pollute the nearby
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Sat, 14 May 2011 15:49:13 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Most probably, the reason is comets are charged bodies. The electric
field of the comet interacts with the electric field of the Sun, and a
CME occurs. The electric interaction is also the reason for cometary
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Sat, 14 May 2011 13:23:57 +0300:
Hi Peter,
[snip]
please source, Robin! Thanks- I was referring to the practical results
I'm not sure what you want the source of. As I said, the 200 times is only a
rough average because it varies from one experiment to the
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Sun, 15 May 2011 07:45:57 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Perhaps the best person to discuss your hydrino ideas
is Randy Mills himself.
This is science, not religion, so orthodoxia and heterodoxies can discuss
freely and peacefully- based on experimental facts. I think it
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I renamed this thread cuz I'd like to hear opinions as to WHY an engineer
succeeded where ALL the scientists failed in optimizing the excess heat and
controllability of whatever this reaction is???
Edisonian vs
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Mon, 16 May 2011 07:38:22 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
I'm not sure what you want the source of. As I said, the 200 times is only a
rough average because it varies from one experiment to the next (read any of
Mills' experimental papers). The 255 keV is just the
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Mon, 16 May 2011 07:38:22 +1000:
Hi,
Oops, clicked on wrong button in spell checker! That should have been:-
(The square of the fine structure constant times the mass energy of the
electron is exactly equal to 1 Hartree).
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
By pulsating the hydrogen pressure in the Rossi reaction vessel, Rossi is
varying the size of the negative hydrogen ions (in terms of atom count of
hydrogen atoms confined within the ion) he produces oscillating from small
to/from large.
The number of protons produced when the H- ion is
Mark,
The one remaining possibility which could explain how the brilliant
scientist Mills' is being outflanked and outscored - thoroughly, and by a
lowly engineer working on a few percent of his budget, could relate to that
mysterious product: the CIHT, mentioned by Peter. It could be his last
On 05/15/2011 06:14 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Sat, 14 May 2011 15:49:13 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Most probably, the reason is comets are charged bodies. The electric
field of the comet interacts with the electric field of the Sun, and a
CME occurs. The
On May 13, 2011, at 5:55 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
I don't believe in them. I have seen this happen more than once in
SOHO videos. A coronal mass ejection corresponds with a comet
collision:
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/05/13/stunning-video-comet-
collides-sun/
T
Hi Terry,
It
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The one remaining possibility which could explain how the brilliant
scientist Mills’ is being outflanked and outscored – thoroughly, and by a
lowly engineer working on a few percent of his budget, could relate to that
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
By pulsating the hydrogen pressure in the Rossi reaction vessel, Rossi is
varying the size of the negative hydrogen ions (in terms of atom count of
hydrogen atoms confined within the ion) he produces oscillating from small
Mechanically I believe. I remember reading that a Rossi coworker said that
pulsing hydrogen pressure works best.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
By pulsating the hydrogen pressure
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Sun impacting asteroids or comets can be expected to cause coronal mass
injection just from their gravitationally induced kinetic energy.
Good to hear from you, Horace.
Indeed, your explanation is a possibility;
The temperature of the metal lattice is a measure of kinetic energy between
its confined nickel atoms and directly proportional to the compressive power
applied to the negative hydride ions entrapped in the lattice defects by
hydride compression.
As the temperature of the nickel powder
How Engineer Rossi May be Beating the Scientists
Most so-called scientists are advanced technicians. Even the more creative
ones tend to find a way forward using logic. Logic is a good partner, but a bad
master. Logic locks you into your box, the box that contains everything you
have already
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Mechanically I believe. I remember reading that a Rossi coworker said that
pulsing hydrogen pressure works best.
Which device in all the tests we have seen provides a mechanical pulse?
T
True to form, I made a silly typo.
I wrote: Sun impacting asteroids or comets can be expected to cause
coronal mass injection just from their gravitationally induced
kinetic energy.
I should have said: Sun impacting asteroids or comets can be
expected to cause coronal mass *ejections*
Just the discussion of a fairly-hidden technology could have us unwittingly
inventing something entirely new.
From: jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:asking my friends
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 09:29:22 -0700
-Original Message-
From: Terry to
From the patent:
A solenoid valve 4 adjusts the pressure under which hydrogen 5 is introduced
into the metal tube.
Both the temperature generated by the electric resistance or resistor and
the hydrogen injection pressure can be easily adjusted either to
constant or pulsating values.
On Sun,
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
So, how is he stripping he hydrogen of its electrons?
How do you know he is not adding, rather than stripping :)
I have researched the CIHT and find no IP on it on the web.
I have not seen any either.
BTW what Mills calls hydrino-hydride is
If the control box can synchronize both the pulsation of the temperature and
the pressure, an accurate control mechanism may thus be provided. The H-
ions produced by increased temperature and/or electric input could be
increased in size by the increase in pressure.
Control of the reaction may
What Mills has done is load H- ions into a nickel lattice as a startup
activity. A shock starts the heat production chain reaction when the nickel
lattice is perturbed and kinetic energy is added. This shock compresses the
H- into nuclear reformation.
What Rossi has done is load H- ions into
On May 13, 2011, at 5:55 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
I don't believe in them. I have seen this happen more than once in
SOHO videos. A coronal mass ejection corresponds with a comet
collision:
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/05/13/stunning-video-comet-
collides-sun/
T
If the earth
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
So, how is he stripping he hydrogen of its electrons?
How do you know he is not adding, rather than stripping :)
Well, most fuel cells strip the electrons and the proton
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
What Mills has done is load H- ions into a nickel lattice as a startup
activity. A shock starts the heat production chain reaction when the nickel
lattice is perturbed and kinetic energy is added. This shock compresses the
H-
That's talking about the pressure regulator from the source tank. AR
removes the H2 source before beginning the reaction. I see no
evidence of any pulsing mechanism other than PT = PT with a variation
on T. Thermal pulsing. Too slow, IMO.
T
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
The typical comet has more than enough kinetic energy to generate the
average CME.
Geeze, this would imply that I could use a directed mass at the sun as
a weapon.
Indirect Hammer of God. One helluva EMP-type
ahuggins
January 15th, 2011 at 4:34
AMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360cpage=1#comment-19110
We hear a pulsating sound in the video of the operating catalyzer. What is
causing the sound?
Rossi did not answer this question. I wonder why?
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:29 PM,
Anther question of Rossi...
*Bertil Karlsson: *Is the reaction pulsating or continuous?
*Rossi:* Substantially continuous
Does Substantially continuous means constanly changing(pulsing) around a
constant average?
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
ahuggins
January 15th, 2011 at 4:34 AM
We hear a pulsating sound in the video of the operating catalyzer. What is
causing the sound?
It's the freaking water pump. Don't you pay attention?
Thanks...
I stand corrected. The reactor was not connected to the hydrogen source.
Could it be that over the years, Rossi is feeling around for the best way to
control his reaction, and that pulsing pressure item got into the patent at
an earlier time? Let be adjust, pulse pressure is one
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks...
I stand corrected. The reactor was not connected to the hydrogen source.
Could it be that over the years, Rossi is feeling around for the best way to
control his reaction, and that pulsing pressure item got into
On May 15, 2011, at 3:32 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Horace Heffner
hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
The typical comet has more than enough kinetic energy to generate the
average CME.
Geeze, this would imply that I could use a directed mass at the sun as
a
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ArataYdevelopmena.pdf
The experiments of Yoshiaki Arata and Yue Chang Zhang, Piantelli, and Rossi
all confirm the nuclear nature of negative hydrogen ion (H-) reactions in
transitions metals.
There is a common thread here.
For example in the experiment
The experiments of Yoshiaki Arata and Yue Chang Zhang show that there is
nothing important provided by the enrichment of the nickel isotope Ni62 to
the H- reaction.
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/ArataYdevelopmena.pdf
On Sun, 15 May 2011 16:29: terry wrote
[snip]I see no evidence of any pulsing mechanism other than PT = PT with a
variation on T. Thermal pulsing. Too slow, IMO.[snip]
Terry,
There is still possible magnetostriction of the powder from the
pulse to the thermal strip.
Fran
Terry
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 15 May 2011 19:24:54 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I think it is more likely that he is using the spillover catalyst
effect to strip electrons which provide work and recombine when the H+
hydride ions pass through the membrane to be oxidized.
Now maybe the free
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Sun, 15 May 2011 19:02:45 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
On 05/15/2011 06:14 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Mauro Lacy's message of Sat, 14 May 2011 15:49:13 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
Most probably, the reason is comets are charged bodies. The electric
field
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 15 May 2011 18:28:50 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
However, I tend toward Spaandonk's explanation, ie the hydrogen from
the comet's water is reacting with the corona.
...actually, I don't think it's the Hydrogen from the water that's reacting.
More likely the
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 15 May 2011 19:32:32 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
The typical comet has more than enough kinetic energy to generate the
average CME.
Geeze, this would imply that I could use a
Probably I don't remember well- but has Arata worked with hydrogen too- not
only deuterium?
Peter
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The experiments of Yoshiaki Arata and Yue Chang Zhang show that there is
nothing important provided by the enrichment of the
I provided the link to the experiment at the top of the first post. All the
info is there.
Kind Regards
Axil
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably I don't remember well- but has Arata worked with hydrogen too-
not only deuterium?
Peter
On
Thank you- but pycno-hydrogen was used only for comparison with
pycno-deuterium and never works (no fusion).
By the way, what is your impression about the many
Arata style experiments? How reliable are they as intensity, reproducibility
etc. ?
I think a positive nanoeffect is fighting with the
I think the distinction involves the fermion-boson nature of the negative
hydrogen ion between deuterium and protium.
Because protium can form a clustered negative hydrogen ion as a fermion, the
ion can mimic the behavior of the electron.
Since deuterium can only form a negative hydrogen ion
But, over all, is he an 'engineer' ?
Ok, I'll wait for the replications.
It seems CLaNZer is building one and Skycollection has something similiar:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdxMbCU7O8c
Harry
From: John Berry aethe...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, May 13, 2011 7:22:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Self Running Free
65 matches
Mail list logo
