http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-drive/driving-it-home/ford-preparing-for-a-jolt-to-the-car-market/article2025218/
Ford preparing for a jolt to the car market
JEREMY CATO
Globe and Mail Update
Ford Motor, says Executive Chairman Bill Ford, is on the cusp of
launching an entire line of
Just wanted to throw out a question to the Vort Collective...
In an EM wave, why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular to each
other?
-Mark
Today, I saw a rather strange message from Andrea Rossi:
Andrea Rossi
May 23rd, 2011 at 2:40 PM
Dear Mr Charlie Zimmerman:
1- I am absolutely not interested to the skepticism, since we are manufacturing
the reactors which in october will start their operation in the market
2- there is no
You are not going to like my answer: Because it is their nature.
Yeah. Told you.
It is best understood by studying the Lorentz Force and working your
way from there. I like this site:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hph.html (click on the
bubble to expand)
but, there's always
In his patent, Rossi says that a true nuclear cold fusion is happening inside
the reactor. (page 12) and he says: triggering a capture of a proton by the
nickel powder, with a consequent transformation of nickel to copper. (page 1)
On page 12 his says also, that: in addition to fusion, the
I have a different answer...
Who says that they are a different field?
In fact the magnetic field is really a fiction.
Tell me what particle sees a magnetic field?
What is effected by the magnetic component of an EM wave?
Charges moving through a magnetic field actually see an electric force
Just wanted to throw out a question to the Vort Collective...
In an EM wave, why are the electric and magnetic fields perpendicular to
each other?
Because the electric and magnetic *effects* manifest perpendicularly?
The fields are an abstract(mental) construction.
In reality, there isn't an
I wonder at the end who owns this exclusive commercial license LTI ?
Ampenergo ? Defkalion ?
Walt Disney, Micky Mouse ?
2011/5/24 Angela Kemmler angela.kemm...@gmx.de
Today, I saw a rather strange message from Andrea Rossi:
Andrea Rossi
May 23rd, 2011 at 2:40 PM
Dear Mr Charlie Zimmerman:
Dear Angela,
I acn explain you this with the words of a very famous aria
from an Italian opera - in German:
Rossi is so unbeständig
wie Federn im Wind,
leicht ändert er seine seine Worte
und ihre Meinung.
Peter
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Angela Kemmler angela.kemm...@gmx.dewrote:
In
Feathers in the wind, good analogy.
I think there are several levels of knowing how a reaction takes
place. I think he says he knows a large part of it; but, he can't put
it in a balanced equation.
T
we still need a Rossi-Speak - English dictionary.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Feathers in the wind, good analogy.
I think there are several levels of knowing how a reaction takes
place. I think he says he knows a large part of it; but, he can't
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
Part 1A
Cude So far, claimed evidence for excess heat in a Rossi apparatus has
been observed directly only by people vetted by Rossi. First Levi, who was
on Rossi’s editorial board, and the recipient of research
Part 1B
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
lomax We know from Aleklett's previous blog post on this that he personally
knows Kullander, the person whom Cude so cavalierly dismisses as if he
were some shill. From his blog:
I said Kullander was on
Part 1C
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
lomax What Cude is betraying is his own severe bias: [incoherent
psychobabble]
That's your own fervent wish. But really, I'm just pointing out that there
is no evidence for a new energy source. I'd like
Part 1D
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
cude But the best evidence that the thing doesn’t produce excess power is
the fact that it can’t power itself.
lomax But, apparently, it can.
You mean allegedly.
The problem is that controlling it,
Part 2B
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
But, this is the point: Storm's analysis was recently accepted under peer
review.
Storms' analysis is a review of conference proceedings. Big deal.
There is no contrary analysis in the literature.
Joshua Cude says:
The power is turned on at 1250 W at time zero. Then at 29
minutes (more than a few), the temperature reaches boiling point
(101C). At 30 minutes, one minute after boiling begins, the
power is reduced to 400 W. But oops, they jumped the gun. The
reactor probably produces a
Part 3
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
lomaxThe original report of neutrons was artifact. The recent reports are
at levels vastly lower, but well above background.
cudePresumably you are referring to the CR-39 results, but these have been
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 7:22 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
And then you cite how Cude gets the temperature measurements backwards.
Abd, it is my hope that Cude becomes acutely aware of you and your
obsessive
analysis of Cude Speak.
Shame it was
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Heat, it is claimed, can be measured to mW, the helium, it is claimed, is
orders of magnitude above the detection limit, and yet the errors are huge.
Notice that Cude doesn't mention how accurately the helium can be
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
valkonen in my knowledge Rossi has never had an urge to demonstrate
anything
and convince anybody.
In your knowledge? That's not really very persuasive. He says that, sure, so
that he has an excuse when the demo
In reply to Angela Kemmler's message of Tue, 24 May 2011 20:33:12 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
Today, I saw a rather strange message from Andrea Rossi:
Andrea Rossi
May 23rd, 2011 at 2:40 PM
Dear Mr Charlie Zimmerman:
1- I am absolutely not interested to the skepticism, since we are
manufacturing the
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 24 May 2011 15:38:18 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Feathers in the wind, good analogy.
I think there are several levels of knowing how a reaction takes
place.
Indeed. He must have a pretty good handle on the external physical aspects of
the process, even if he
At 05:21 PM 5/24/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
Part 2B
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Abd ul-Rahman
Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
The thrust of the Gozzi paper is opposite to
what Cude wants us to conclude from his
citation of it. In the body of the paper,
Can't we just stop speculating on all this Rossi stuff 'til November 2011
when his 1MW plants have been running for a while ( or not )? Woops, I
forgot, the world ends in October 2011, so I guess it just doesn't matter
anyway.
HoytStearns
Scottsdale, Arizona US
Joshua Cude to vortex-l
show details 2:21 PM (7 hours ago)
Part 2B
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
. There are now about 17 reviews of cold fusion (not primary
papers, there are many more of them) that have been published in
mainstream
26 matches
Mail list logo
