I think Moller was enjoying same benefit of Soret enrichment from
sputtering with MAHG as Rossi. We recently learned Rossi also sputters Ni
powder inside of his reactor walls. Rossi appears to keep gain low in E-cat, We
speculate this preserves the Casimir geometry of pits on surface
Hoyt,
It is hard to stop speculating when there are so many clues and
common denominators circulating with respect to the work of Rossi and other
researchers.
Fran
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-13522957
Egyptian pyramids found by infra-red satellite images
By Frances Cronin
BBC News
The infrared image on the right reveals the ancient city streets of
Tanis near modern-day San El Hagar.
Seventeen lost pyramids are among the buildings identified in a new
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1105/24spirit/
NASA closes book on Spirit rover's historic mission
BY STEPHEN CLARK
SPACEFLIGHT NOW
Posted: May 24, 2011
NASA's immobilized, crippled Spirit rover likely succumbed to cold
temperatures during the last Martian winter, and officials will cease
Alessandro Casali
May 25th, 2011 at 4:43 AM
Dear Mr. Rossi,
Thanks in advance for your patience, i have a simple question that im
sure you can clarify.
You have recently stated that each signle e-cat (in the 1 MW Greek plant)
will produce 2.5 kW so how can you reach 1 MW with only 300
On 2011-05-25 19:37, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Dear Mr Alessandre Casali: you are right, 300 is not the exact number,
is an order of magnitude. Actually, the configuration of the 1 MW plant
is complex, and confidential. I can’t give details: of course you are
right: 2,5 x 300 makes 750. We will
Ok, Joshua Cude IS aware of Abd's posts. Good.
...
From Abd
I have not read the rest of his [Cude's] trash.
I have actual research to do.
In my view such pithy responses tend to reveal petulant behavior and a
little bit of immaturity too.
Keep in mind, Abd, several days ago you essentially
You're right Terry, I don't like your answer!
And I don't think any of the other explanations answered the question
adequately...
From my purely physical model, it would be a natural cause-effect relationship
due to a polarizable
vacuum... i.e., the electric and magnetic fields of mainstream
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
I think any theory should have to explain the simple
observations first before delving down into more difficult and esoteric
aspects of physics.
You sound more like a philosopher now. I know it's cliché but, the
more
Thanks for: ... Nevertheless, In my view you may not have adequately
rebuttaled the bulk of Joshua's rebuttals in an honorable fashion
Let's encourage non ad hominem, civil, polite, gracious, patient,
evidence and detail oriented, genteel, lightly humorous, collaborative
communication -- one
Peter,
Regarding cheapness : It appears the enrichment Rossi mentions is a free
side effect of sputtering [Soret effect] that only segregates the isotopes by a
matter of centimeters but since this places the heavier isotopes closer to the
cold reactor wall and each other it may be enough to
SCALE-UP- the problem was already shown at the first virtue;
modular scale-up is not genuine scale up., IMHO. It has to be more than
addition of many small units. Question- why it was made a scale down
after the first two experiments?
The scale down was for controlability. The February
130kW
Thank you! But we have not seen much of these features during the
experiments. Let's hope it is OK.
Peter
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
*SCALE-UP- *the problem was already shown at the first virtue; modular
scale-up is not genuine scale up., IMHO. It
HARD CURRENCY ENERGY- how the thermal energy of the active core
can be converted in electric energy in an economical way?
I don't think that's going to (or needs to) happen any time soon --- it
only delivers 500C (limited by the nickel powder degrading?) at 50 bar.
Electrical conversion
At 01:24 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
HARD CURRENCY ENERGY- how
the thermal energy of the active core can be converted in electric energy
in an economical way?
I don't think that's going to (or needs to) happen any time soon --- it
only delivers 500C (limited by the nickel powder degrading?) at 50
Alan J Fletcher wrote:
I don't think that's going to (or needs to) happen any time soon ---
it only delivers 500C (limited by the nickel powder degrading?) at 50
bar.
Electrical conversion efficiency at that level is less than 20% (??)
-- times the 6x factor is barely over unity.
It is way
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
With all the sophistication and accuracy to umpteen decimal places in
atomic physics/QM, how come we
can't explain WHY they're perpendicular! I think any theory should have to
explain the simple
observations first
Unlike Abd, I did not propose to taken on Cude, and I still do not.
I will say, however, that his views seem to boil down to an assertion
that conventional instruments and techniques do not work. Calorimetry
and x-ray film do not work. Replications by hundreds of researchers mean
nothing. The
There is an aspect to Rossi's e-cat thermal generation process that
remains fuzzy to me. It's my understanding that Rossi has to push the
temperature of his e-Cat cores up into the neighborhood of 500C via an
external heating process before the mysterious Rossi thermal reaction
takes over.
That
RE: sounding like a philosopher...
Yep, since I'm an INTP personality type, I tend to focus on the forest...
RE: our models...
I guess what prompted my intial question to the Collective (re; perpendicular E
and B fields) was
that, although we do have some good models, they were done over
It is time to repeat this point again.
Rossi does not need to use water to steam as a power transfer mechanism
because steam implies high pressure. And high pressure is expensive.
A molten salt or liquid metal coolant produced at ambient pressure can cool
the Rossi reactor. These coolants
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 16:08:10 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
What do mean by we? It's not from observing e-m waves that we know the
fields are perpendicular. It follows from Maxwell's equations, which predict
the waves. So, certainly some people can explain in arbitrary detail
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Wed, 25 May 2011
16:37:04 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Perhaps I've misunderstood a fundamental aspect concerning how excess
energy is supposed to be extracted from Rossi's e-cats. Is it rather
the situation where once 500 C is reached (by external
In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 13:06:10 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Rossi implies that the output is constantly monitored and automatically
adjusted. He guarantees a 6x amplification, but he probably has plenty of
'amplification' in reserve.
[snip]
I'm beginning to wonder about
In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 13:59:30 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
At 01:24 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
HARD CURRENCY ENERGY- how the thermal energy of the active core can be
converted in electric energy in an economical way?
I don't think that's going to (or needs to) happen
Ok, you need to consider my answer if you want to understand this.
You are assuming that a thing called a magnetic field really exists and this
is the reason for your problem.
Consider first how to interact with of detect magnetic fields, first take
the Neutron, what reaction does it have to a
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:50 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 16:08:10 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
What do mean by we? It's not from observing e-m waves that we know the
fields are perpendicular. It follows from Maxwell's equations, which
predict
At 03:31 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 13:59:30 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
At 01:24 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
HARD CURRENCY ENERGY- how the thermal energy of the active core
can be converted in electric energy in an economical way?
I'm probably too
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I will say, however, that his views seem to boil down to an assertion that
conventional instruments and techniques do not work.
Wrong. I have never asserted that, and I do not believe it. I will assert
that tools do not
In reply to Joshua Cude's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 17:54:32 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Maxwell's equations were developed to describe laboratory electricity and
magnetism experiments.
...from which the peculiar perpendicular nature of the phenomenon was already
evident.
The resulting equations then
Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I will say, however, that his views seem to boil down to an assertion
that conventional instruments and techniques do not work.
Wrong. I have never asserted that, and I do not believe it. I will assert
that tools do not make a carpenter, and that
Robin beat me to the punch... I was changing spark-plugs and serpentine belts
on my car!
Robin hits the nail on the head... Anything mathematical is the MODEL, and is
supposed to reflect
physical reality. My question was about the physical world -- what I was
asking got was a rational,
John:
Let me ask a few questions so I can better understand what you're proposing...
What is your interpretation of the magnetic moment present in all elementary
particles where
electrical currents don't even come into play?
Of course atoms can be affected by a magnetic field... this is the
How about giving a few examples of the sort of answer you'd find satisfactory?
Sent from my iPhone.
On May 25, 2011, at 20:33, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Robin beat me to the punch... I was changing spark-plugs and serpentine belts
on my car!
Robin hits the nail on the
Thanks for your input, Robin
I wouldn't mind additional commentary from the collective. ;-)
Are there differing views opinions on this matter?
Once again, I post my original questions [slightly reedited for
clarification]:
Perhaps I've misunderstood a fundamental aspect concerning how
What a profound statement. Thank you!
Sent from my iPhone.
On May 25, 2011, at 15:44, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's encourage non ad hominem, civil, polite, gracious, patient,
evidence and detail oriented, genteel, lightly humorous, collaborative
communication -- one of the
A detailed Qualitative Approach to the Cold Fusion Nuclear Reactions of H/Ni
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497
At 05:55 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
A detailed Qualitative Approach to the Cold Fusion Nuclear Reactions of H/Ni
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497
Fig 3 -- supposedly based on measurements -- shows the results when a
single pulse of input power is applied:
At 06:10 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
At 05:55 PM 5/25/2011, you wrote:
A detailed Qualitative Approach to the Cold Fusion Nuclear Reactions of H/Ni
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497
Fig 3 -- supposedly based on measurements -- shows the results when
a single pulse of input power
Recently, I was doing a survey of papers addressing the potassium/carbon
formation of Rydburg matter; and one paper turned up from blacklight that
got me thinking.
The thermally reversible hydrino catalysts system as a new power source.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.netwrote:
John:
Let me ask a few questions so I can better understand what you're
proposing...
What is your interpretation of the magnetic moment present in all elementary
particles where electrical currents don't even come
This paper may come closer to explaining what goes on in the Piantelli
reaction, than it does for the Rossi reaction.
I say that it is impossible (unthinkable – it just cannot be) to create
light elements from the fission of nickel or copper.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Alan J Fletcher
Written in 1993, the author investigates the debunking of N-Rays because he
sees
similarities
with the tatics employed to debunk cold fusion and homeopathy. An interesting
read!
Harry
The Theatre of the Blind: Starring a Promethean Prankster, a Phoney Phenomenon,
a Prism, a Pocket, and a
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible that Mills is seeing the same reaction that Rossi sees and
has mistakenly invented the “hydrino atom” mechanism to explain it?
Do you not read anything Jones Beene writes?
Is Rydburg matter loaded into the
So sorry, please excuse me. Rydberg was misspelled in my spell checker. It’s
now corrected and won't be misspelled again.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible that
Reactivity is directly related to the tendency of the Rossi reactor core to
change power level: if reactivity is positive, the power level tends to
increase; if it is negative, the power tends to decrease; if it is zero, the
power tends to remain stable. The reactivity of the reactor may be
Axil,
IMHO, yes Mills and Rossi are seeing the same effect and are both wrong -
Jan Naudts is the only one who got it right when he proposed the hydrogen
atoms are actually relativistic. decreasing energy density for Casimir
geometry is a big clue because it mirrors relativistic effects for
Thanks! Perhaps not evrything that Rossi says is absolutely true. Was
sputtering used for isotopic enrichment- actually segregation? Goes it to
the level of individual atoms?
I don't buy the idea of catalysis- it has be more probable
some emhanced nanometric effect.
Peter
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at
yer welcome, sonny...
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Charles Hope
lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com wrote:
What a profound statement. Thank you!
Sent from my iPhone.
On May 25, 2011, at 15:44, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's encourage non ad hominem, civil, polite, gracious,
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 21:18:50 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Is it possible that Mills is seeing the same reaction that Rossi sees and
has mistakenly invented the hydrino atom mechanism to explain it?
[snip]
Mills developed the theory first, then went looking for experimental
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 21:18:50 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Could the Rossi process just be the Mills process extended to operate on a
continuous semi-annual basis?
[snip]
That what I proposed about a month ago. :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 25 May 2011 21:33:26 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I say that it is impossible (unthinkable it just cannot be) to create
light elements from the fission of nickel or copper.
[snip]
What's impossible about:
4H + Ni60 = 2 S32 + 16.7 MeV ?
(Note that while fissioning
52 matches
Mail list logo
