On 2011-06-11 06:30, Harry Veeder wrote:
On facebook 'Rats Gautam' sent emails to all the individuals mentioned in Loris
Ferrari's
article but only received responses from Mauro Villa and Loris Ferrari himself.
He posted their responses here:
https://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/EnergyCatalyzer
From: francis [mailto:froarty...@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 9:13 AM
To: 'jone...@pacbell.net'
Subject: [Vo]:2011 Colloquium MIT Tomorrow
Hi Jones,
Good points all and greatly anticipating the transcripts from
these presentations - hopefully more on Brian's
I hope we don't have to wait until September for more data.
T
The following is from Edmund Storms who gave me permission to post his
thoughts pertaining to this subject thread.
***
I gave a lot of thought to what was basic to the process when I
proposed Chemically Assisted Nuclear
Hi
This obvious fact from hot air balloons and rising smoke is also the case in
constant volume. Just do the math if you can't see what I mean.
Imagine a ball on lying at rest in a box. This is equivalent of a cold gas.
All pressure from the ball is on the bottom of the box. The weight of the
Daniele Passerini constantly talks about April 21. Perhaps this
mysterious date was that, when team Ferrari made the 10 hour test with
output that was sufficient for 10-20 washing machines. If that is the
case, then scientific validation of E-Cat has already been made, by
this Bologna team of
Well, Steven - since we are back to name calling - CANR is a good name,
but it may miss the PR-boat (public relations) - particularly if this
field aspires to have an identity that encompasses most of the hydrogen
energy anomalies.
Nuclear decay, fission or fusion do not violate CoE for the
Does anyone know if it is being recorded on video?
Harry
- Original Message
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, June 9, 2011 10:34:15 PM
Subject: [Vo]:2011 Colloquium MIT Tomorrow
http://world.std.com/~mica/2011colloq.html
Speakers: Peter
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:10:12 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Isomer energy itself is a newer field that was born out of top secret
military devices like the hafnium or tantalum (gamma) lasers. What the
nature of the loss mass involved consists of - is nebulous: Gluons? Pions?
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:10:12 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
However, the real point of this post is that mass assigned to an element
is an average, and the deviation for average is unknown. The range of mass
in any element could be small, which is the mainstream viewpoint -
Early report is that time constraints were running over ... and Brian did
not get to present today ... and curiously that there was a fair amount of
deep talk about the huge missed opportunity of the Patterson Cell.
When the history of this chapter is finally written - that failure (remember
that
The Patterson styrene microbeads had a copper substrate coated with Ni
followed by a layer of Pd and topping off with Ni. Lithium sulfate
was the electrolyte. I wonder why Patterson chose that particular
electrolyte? And did the Cu actually play a part in the reaction?
Was the method of metal
Here's a good article on the cell. Interesting that some beads had Ni
only; but, it appears they all used copper chloride so the Ni would
not damage the styrene.
http://www.padrak.com/ine/PPC97.html
T
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
... and curiously that there was a fair amount of
deep talk about the huge missed opportunity of the Patterson Cell.
When the history of this chapter is finally written - that failure
(remember
that Motorola almost got involved with big buck$) could
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
It was heartbreaking. It was one of the most disappointing frustrating
infuriating incidents in the history of cold fusion, which has had many
dreadful incidents.
But, what most of our list members might not know, as
15 matches
Mail list logo
