trust. The point was to examine the species to which the Essen and
Kullander report belongs.
Is it informal or objective?
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Trust but verify.
T
I agree the core is hotter and the Casimir regions where the heat anomaly is
born may be even hotter yet. I know Jones Beene posits these areas can be
considered cold due to confinement but myself being of a relativistic
perspective think these hot and cold labels are not up to the task. A
Curie
On 2011-07-16 00:21, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
A new interview to Sergio Focardi has been posted on Passerini's blog here:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/07/intervista-di-focardi-energylab.html
Google translated short link: http://goo.gl/nxcMG
By the way, apparently, according
From: francis
* I agree the core is hotter and the Casimir regions where the heat
anomaly is born may be even hotter yet. I know Jones Beene posits these
areas can be considered cold due to confinement but myself being of a
relativistic perspective think these hot and cold labels are not
I would have guessed the water would stop swirling within 10s, long before
boiling, which in my oven I attain by setting it to 5:30.
The reason for swirling it was just that a lot of microwave ovens seem to
heat from the top, and if you don't get it swirling, you end up with a cup of
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/FleischmannWatches.pdf
(And had an email correspondence with Nature ... who [obviously] decided not to
mention the eCat )
The title is misleading. The topic is not about Fleischman watching
the coverage, this was just a note in the beginning of the article.
The article is a actually about an email interview with Brian
Josephson and his online QA video.
OK, I will fess up - the labels are up to the task but I am not. Even if I
were able to find an accepted relationship between the Casimir and Gamma
dilation formulas the Lorentzian translations would for the most part be an
even wash and I would have to concentrate only on the asymmetries where
At 03:20 PM 7/15/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
There is no other way to be sure you have a cold fusion effect in
the first place. There is no point to testing a cell that is not
producing heat.
That's not *entirely
- Good Day. Lloyd
nhc.lefora.com
--- On Sat, 7/16/11, vortex-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
vortex-digest-requ...@eskimo.com wrote:
From: vortex-digest-requ...@eskimo.com vortex-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
Subject: vortex-digest Digest V2011 #1148
To: vortex-dig...@eskimo.com
Date: Saturday, July
At 06:08 PM 7/15/2011, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Having said that, I feel that Krivit should have paid more attention
to some technical details. He should have made more observations and
reported more facts, such as whether Rossi placed the feedwater
reservoir on a weight scale, and if so, how much
At 06:38 PM 7/15/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 03:21 PM 7/15/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
A new interview to Sergio Focardi has been posted on Passerini's blog here:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/07/intervista-di-focardi-energylab.html
Google translated short link: http://goo.gl/nxcMG
It
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/7/15 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com:
I must say, I'm appalled at how much time has been wasted on
inadequate demonstrations.
This is surprising considering that anyone here has never said
anything
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 4:50 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
My perception on the reactor core has always implied that the volume
of water entering the reactor core could vary.
Well, that's the difference then. But I think you're mistaken. Rossi uses a
pump
4. scientific proof unworthy of my time, just wait a bit to see big
customers buying my huge power units in October (well, maybe
November...)
15 matches
Mail list logo
