On Aug 22, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
I've been having some off-vortex action with this.
Latest version is at http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_steam_v410E.php
My attention was drawn to an excellent Rossi eCat simulator by a
Rick Cantwell
I just now wrote: Since 800 W is used for each of the 3 runs, the
steam generation, and water condensation in the hose, should be
exactly the same. It is not. Therefore it is reasonable that liquid
water is being injected into the hose when flowing water is used in
the second two run
I just now wrote: It is notable that 4 muffin fans were shown in the
E-cat.
This should have said: It is notable that 4 muffin fans were shown
in the E-cat controller.
Sigh.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
On Aug 22, 2011, at 5:53 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Regarding the video, Rick does good work.
- Jed
Yes, indeed!
However, it appears he forgot to wear his lab coat! 8^)
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:
The energy storage device could prove extremely useful for
electric vehicles, where it could reduce the recharge time from hours
to less than a minute.
As long as you have a MegaWatt power substation at your disposal.
T
Some consolidated and clarified text follows.
It appears a significant deficiency of Rick Cantwells experiment:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXTl8z_2Uqo
is similar to a major deficiency of Rossi's demonstrations; namely,
it is not possible to tell what is happening in the hose, especially
Cantwell should attempt steam quality measurements on his device. This
should include continuous measurement of steam velocity at exit which can be
done with a fairly inexpensive probe.
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
- Percolator effect happens quickly (Lots of water at the outlet -- at
3:30 he empties the hose, and it refills in about 7 seconds.)
This is operating as a TUBE Boiler.
Do you mean it is overflowing? Water mixed with steam is pouring over of the
At 05:43 AM 8/23/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
Some consolidated and clarified
text follows.
... I'm heading out for a couple of days, so I don't have time to check
your method or numbers
(assuming a 94 °C boiling point)
of:
Isn't that a bit low?
You still need to take into account the fact that
This excerpt from PhysOrg.com..
My money is on the possibility that they won't find it, and with other
developments like LENR, the high-energy physics community will need to
rethink their precious theories! The Paradigms are a Changin'.
-Mark
==
Just last month, physicists
I disagree that what happens in the horizontal tube is nor relevant. If steam
bubbles up through cold water rather than hot makes much difference. Also if 2g
of water is turned into dry steam the volume of steam is ~ 3.5L. 3.5L per
second of gas bubbling through a small volume of liquid will be
Didn't think I would ever feel an earthquake in NJ but my entire office was
shaking and I thought my peers were just having a go at me by rocking cabinets
on either side of my cube.
If that 5.8 was centered all the way down near Richmond I can't imagine how it
still felt so strong up here.
On Aug 23, 2011, at 5:35 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Percolator effect happens quickly (Lots of water at the outlet --
at 3:30 he empties the hose, and it refills in about 7 seconds.)
This is operating as a TUBE Boiler.
Do you mean it is overflowing? Water
I have been nonplussed by Levi the last few months, because I was expecting
he would provide more details about the February 2011 18-hour test with
flowing water. I still wish he would do that. As I said, I wish he would
tell me the made and model of the flow meter. I asked; he did not respond.
In
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
This does not happen with the eCat, as shown in the videos made by Lewan.
How is it shown by Lewan's videos that water does not overflow from the
E-Cat?
In some of the videos he showed the hose removed from the bucket for a few
minutes with
In krivit’s video the bucket is removed for around 30seconds, not few minutes.
From 11:10 to 11:20 and from 11:26 to 11:46 (SEE KRIVIT’S VIDEO)
And the water flow can’t be 7 liter/h since the pump is pumping every 2.5-3
seconds, so the true water flow is lower than 3 liter/h
LMI P18 pump has a
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
In krivit’s video the bucket is removed for around 30seconds, not few
minutes. From 11:10 to 11:20 and from 11:26 to 11:46 (SEE KRIVIT’S VIDEO)
That is correct, but I saw a longer video from Lewan.
- Jed
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
And the water flow can’t be 7 liter/h since the pump is pumping every
2.5-3 seconds, so the true water flow is lower than 3 liter/h
LMI P18 pump has a maximum flow of 12 l/h at 100 strikes/minutes. With
25 strikes/minute is (maximum) 3 l/h. It can be lower than 3 liter/h.
In this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVEBCN6D13w ? (lewan in april)
Again, you can see it (removed from water) at 3:17 to 3:37, 20 seconds. And in
this video you can hear that there is some (liquid water) since is very noisy.
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 10:51 PM
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
In this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVEBCN6D13w ? (lewan in
april)
Again, you can see it (removed from water) at 3:17 to 3:37, 20
seconds. And in this video you can hear that there is some (liquid
water) since is very noisy.
I believe I saw a longer one
Rossi's hose may be longer but the 25W/m cooling rate is much to small to
explain Levi's statement that 50% of the steam is condensing in the hose.
- Original Message -
From: Horace Heffner
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 3:22 PM
Subject: Re:
PhysOrg excerpt below, paper is here: http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.2304v1
An incredibly rare sub-atomic particle decay might not be quite as rare as
previously predicted, say Cornell researchers. This discovery, culled from a
vast data set at the Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDF), is a clue
2011/8/23 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Along similar lines, the tests with steam do not produce such easily
understood, irrefutable results. But the weakness of these tests does not
call into question the flowing water test.
It is kind of sad that Levi refuses to admit that he did poor
I felt it too in Western PA. Some observations; it was a back and forth motion
with a period of about .6 seconds. I have felt the rumbling of trains, truck,
and cranes, These have a higher frequency that is more of a rumbling, about 10
hertz or so. The earth quake produced no plaster
24 matches
Mail list logo
