--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Jouni,
I am not certain I follow quite what you're suggesting. Are you suggesting
that, possibly, the absolute frame of reference may have differing velocities
based on the velocity of the local object? I.E, some planet,
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Yeah. Bien sur. The whole issue isn't that some
religious law might be broken; it's that you can get
contradictions if we allow stuff like this to go on without
careful controls on it, and short cuts, improbability
physics,
From the CERN paper, all the neutrinos stated out as muon neutrinos and
where received as muon neutrinos without flavor change to tau neutrinos. So
no flavor changing occurred.
The speed of the muon neutrinos was not a function of their energy either.
These results rule out the MSW effect as a
On 09/24/2011 06:23 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
First, you hit a sore point here, and I'm going to address it first.
The sore point is people giving some special, unusual meaning to a
common word, and then pretending that they've done something more clever
than just introduce a monkey wrench
Hi
found a video that demonstrates how easy steam calorimetry can be done:
http://youtu.be/OHvnpYgg_rw
No heat excanger needed as they will use at sweden and no 6 months of
preparation as Levi claimed.
Some bubbling happens. I think that comes from air, that was dissolved
in the evaporated
Exaclty.
The video was made ny an italian and show a TRUE 5kW 7kg/h (of liquid water)
and it's huge, compared to the krivit video, despite some experts.
-Messaggio originale-
From: Peter Heckert
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 1:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi
Ah, same parameters as in Krivit video.
5kW of power, 7kg/h of steam, same diameter of hose.
-Messaggio originale-
From: Mattia Rizzi
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 2:21 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi steam calorimetry
Exaclty.
The video was made ny an italian
Correction: 7kg/h of water consumed.
The calorimetry done in the video confirm results.
-Messaggio originale-
From: Mattia Rizzi
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 2:23 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Rossi steam calorimetry
Ah, same parameters as in Krivit video.
5kW of power,
Is finally available here:
http://pesn.com/2011/09/25/9501919_2011_Cold_Fusion_Colloquium_Report_Published/SwartzColloqPart2.pdf
Attached is the scale reading at 0:33 in the Mario video:
http://youtu.be/OHvnpYgg_rw
This reading corresponds to the initial 10 kg weight. Note the 5
major divisions. The question then is whether the line at 6 o'clock
is the zero line.
inline: Mario0_33bucket.jpg
Best regards,
Horace
Attached is the scale reading at 2:44 in the Mario video:
http://youtu.be/OHvnpYgg_rw
This reading corresponds to the final weight. Note the 6 major
divisions. 12 minor divisions. The question then is whether the line
at 6 o'clock is the zero line.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
Attached is a jpeg, Krivit9_53.jpg, from 9.53 in the Krivit video.
showing Rossi's wrist and the steam pipe.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
inline: Krivit9_53.jpg
On Sep 25, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Mattia Rizzi wrote:
Correction: 7kg/h of water consumed.
The calorimetry done in the video confirm results.
It is not clear to me what results are you saying are confirmed?
If 105 gm of steam are produced as stated, then that is 6.3 kg/hr.
If the steam
On 09/24/2011 09:57 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 09/24/2011 11:04 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
The New Scientist article, Dimension-hop may allow neutrinos to
cheat light speed, here:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957-dimensionhop-may-allow-
neutrinos-to-cheat-light-speed.html
suggest
Steam sparging is easy to do, but obviously we must still remember to leave
measurements for experts, because if Horace does the measurements he will
get at least 25% error, because he can only do one datapoint at the time...
I do not know where to even begin debunking Horace's analysis, perhaps
Am 25.09.2011 20:05, schrieb Jouni Valkonen:
Steam sparging is easy to do, but obviously we must still remember to
leave measurements for experts, because if Horace does the
measurements he will get at least 25% error, because he can only do
one datapoint at the time...
I do not know where
Maoro, i did propose that idea also here at Vortex, but it does not work and
it cannot explain 7 km/s difference. We have measured that speed of light in
vacuum is not depended on direction at least accuracy of ±0.1 m/s. I do not
remember how accurately it was measured, but it was much more
On Sep 25, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Steam sparging is easy to do, but obviously we must still remember
to leave measurements for experts, because if Horace does the
measurements he will get at least 25% error, because he can only do
one datapoint at the time...
Now
On 09/25/2011 03:19 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Maoro, i did propose that idea also here at Vortex, but it does not work and
it cannot explain 7 km/s difference. We have measured that speed of light in
vacuum is not depended on direction at least accuracy of ±0.1 m/s. I do not
remember how
http://www.unibo.it/SitoWebDocente/default.htm?UPN=enrico.campari%40unibo.itTabControl1=TabCV
So he should know much about steam,energy and water overflow ;-)
On Sep 25, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
http://www.unibo.it/SitoWebDocente/default.htm?UPN=enrico.campari%
40unibo.itTabControl1=TabCV
So he should know much about steam,energy and water overflow ;-)
I wonder if it was a percolator? 8^)
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
On Sep 25, 2011, at 1:03 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
http://www.unibo.it/SitoWebDocente/default.htm?UPN=enrico.campari%
40unibo.itTabControl1=TabCV
So he should know much about steam,energy and water overflow ;-)
All joking aside, I hope for Professor Levi's very great success in
his next
Kyle,
Indeed i again wrote something that is very difficult to understand because
we do not have proper words. My less than adequate English does not help
either.
Anyway for recapitulation, here is the key idea of my definition for
absolute frame of reference in ”breef” summary.
Imagine
Hello group,
This got just posted on Daniele Passerini's blog: http://goo.gl/v2uqo
(Long URL:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/09/test-e-cat-col-nobel-brian-josephson-il.html
)
It looks like Brian Josephson will test an e-Cat module quite soon. He
announced this on the CMNS list:
On
After almost a year of scientific failures in testing E-Cat I will bet 2
cents that Brian will also fail scientifically. He will probably measure
lots of irrelevant data, but misses some crucial bit of information that
prevents us to estimate the reliability of measurements accurately, and thus
we
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
found a video that demonstrates how easy steam calorimetry can be done:
http://youtu.be/OHvnpYgg_rw
No heat excanger needed as they will use at sweden and no 6 months of
preparation as Levi claimed.
This is a steam sparge test. This is what I
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 9:13:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi steam calorimetry
I do not understand why they intend to use a heat exchanger. Why not simply
run water through the thing, the way they did in the 18-hour test
Am 26.09.2011 00:32, schrieb Akira Shirakawa:
Hello group,
This got just posted on Daniele Passerini's blog: http://goo.gl/v2uqo
(Long URL:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/09/test-e-cat-col-nobel-brian-josephson-il.html
)
It looks like Brian Josephson will test an e-Cat module quite soon.
Am 26.09.2011 05:20, schrieb Harry Veeder:
From: Jed Rothwelljedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 9:13:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi steam calorimetry
I do not understand why they intend to use a heat exchanger. Why not simply run
water through the
29 matches
Mail list logo
