Greetings All,
In case that you haven t see this before:
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/New-LENR-Machine-is-the-Best-Yet.html
Respectfully,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
From e-Catworld:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/04/more-details-about-pirelli-high-school-cold-fusion-experiment/
This is a human translation of the email sent yesterday to 22passi by
the L.Pirelli CF experiment organizer eng. Ugo Abundo. I recommend
reading it.
Instructions and directions
Ron,
I got no complaints with their theory - right or wrong it is,
IMHO, closer to the truth than all the others. The herd is thinning and I
predict we will see a shift toward the Brillouin technology even while trying
to wrap it in their own proprietary theories along with a
While searching for links to my QUI CITO newsletter
I came upon this:
A possible solution to a critical barrier to producing fusion energy
http://www.kurzweilai.net/a-possible-solution-to-a-critical-barrier-to-producing-fusion-energy
It is always stimulating to see the competition trying to
A quick reading and first impressions:
1/ It appears then that they are using 100's of Watt input from a rectified
Variac. Though actual power input is only hinted at with Variac Range of
60-240V and 0.3-9A input, (spanning 20-2160W), though later on they mention
120-160V and as little as 0.3A
Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
They are thus probably generating 100's or Watts output based on their
COP=4 claim, so it should be easy to do accurate calorimetry on.
As far as I know, you cannot make a glow discharge appear with 10s or
hundreds of watts.
The calorimetry
While Brillouin seems well founded, disciplined and scientific it does
appear that they have a pretty major problem in that their COP at 2.1
is too low to be commercially useful. I believe they achieved that
almost a year ago if the info on their website is anything to go by,
and yet in their
Does that use H or D?
2012/4/24 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
They are thus probably generating 100's or Watts output based on their
COP=4 claim, so it should be easy to do accurate calorimetry on.
As far as I know, you cannot make a
I wrote:
As far as I know, you cannot make a glow discharge appear with 10s or
hundreds of watts.
I meant the plasma does not form WITHOUT at least 10s or hundreds of watts.
Nothing happens at low power. You have turn up power until the cathode is
incandescent and then purple streams of
Reading the description of the experimental setup Abundo writes only
of Hydrogen.
The text below is very interesting besides mentioning Hydrogen gas,
gives the idea that, as many guessed on vortex-l, that Rossi's
catalyst is indeed iron used to split H2 in H.
il mix di polveri, quando usato con
On 2012-04-19 11:21, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Website: http://www.theatomunexplored.org/
The website is now live:
http://theatomunexplored.com/
Cheers,
S.A.
My alma mater, Ga Tech, births drones!
excerpt:
There are at least 63 active drone sites around the U.S, federal
authorities have been forced to reveal following a landmark Freedom of
Information lawsuit.
The unmanned planes – some of which may have been designed to kill
terror suspects – are
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Does that use H or D?
Ordinary water, that has been purified with a Milli-Q purifier. See:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTconfirmatia.pdf
They spend a couple of days cleaning the cathodes and other equipment,
using a sacrifice cathode as a
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-04-19 11:21, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Website: http://www.theatomunexplored.org/
The website is now live:
http://theatomunexplored.com/
Cheers,
S.A.
...and the conference will be streamed online on
maybe I minsinterpreted their reports, but
it seem that the COP~2 is for the low temperature liquid phase home boiler.
they gas phase boiler, working at 400-500C seems to have an undisclosed
COP...
can someone correct me.
Le 24 avril 2012 16:30, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com a
écrit
For more about the explosion, see:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTanomalouse.pdf
Brillouin expects the test of the new Hot Tube model at SRI will be capable
of delivering steam at temperatures from 400ºC to 500ºC (750-932ºF).
This means that SRI will build the high pressure hydrogen reactor.
Currently, this reactor is just a concept and a hope. Such a reactor has
not been
This one does by turning inside out:
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2012/04/flying-object-propels-itself-by-flipping-inside-out.html?cmpid=NLC|NSNS|2012-2304-GLOBAL|flyingobjectsutm_medium=NLCutm_source=NSNSutm_content=flyingobjects
http://goo.gl/p2NdK
Is that an iPhone controller?
It appears to be early in the development cycle for the dry reactor so let's
hope that it progresses well.
I have not seen any reference to transformation of nickel to copper as Rossi
claims and I was wondering if anyone else has seen any references. Why would
all of the freshly minted
Well, the short answer is instantaneous. The Brillo boys are using a variant
of W-L theory, which to the thinking of many of us has more holes than
Dunkin’ – since neutrons activate everything in the surroundings … but with
a curious twist. That twist makes it fully falsifiable - and if it proves
That must have been frightening. I would like to understand what they
conclude; are they suggesting that they initially had a fusion reaction
followed by a multitude of different pathway fission processes?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l
It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the long run. Maybe the
'Brillo boys' have not run their device for a long enough period to generate
detectable products.
If they are following this discussion perhaps one of them would respond to your
pertinent question about the detection
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
What gives the Rossi type reactor its power is the secret sauce and the
Rossi reaction is different from and more powerful than the Brillouin
reaction.
Considering that Rossi hasn't revealed how the E-Cat system works I
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:06:58 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
This one does by turning inside out:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:03:18 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I get the impression they are still 10 years behind the times.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-04-19 11:21, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Website:
From Terry
This one does by turning inside out:
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/nstv/2012/04/flying-object-propels-
itself-by-flipping-inside-out.html?cmpid=NLC|NSNS|2012-2304-
GLOBAL|flyingobjectsutm_medium=NLCutm_source=NSNSutm_content=flyingo
bjects
http://goo.gl/p2NdK
Kewel!
I
On 2012-04-24 14:24, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
From e-Catworld:
Building instructions hand translated in English:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/04/english-translation-of-build-instructions-for-pirelli-athanor-cell/
Cheers,
S.A.
...but now I can't think outside of the box. ;)
Harry
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
This one does by turning inside out:
Building instructions hand translated in English:
http://www.e-catworld.com/**2012/04/english-translation-**
of-build-instructions-for-**pirelli-athanor-cell/http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/04/english-translation-of-build-instructions-for-pirelli-athanor-cell/
Detailed instructions! Good.
How does the initiating step differ from the electron-capture
proposed in W-L papers?
Hasn't someone here rebutted the physics of e-c capture?
Not freshly minted?
Jones Beene wrote:
Well, the short answer is instantaneous. The Brillo boys are using a
variant
of W-L theory, which to the
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:39:12 -0700:
Hi,
Note that enhanced electron capture is also a characteristic of Hydrino capture
or Horace's theory. The difference being that with these theories the electron
capture happens either concurrent with or after the proton
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:48 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I have not seen any reference to transformation of nickel to copper as
Rossi claims and I was wondering if anyone else has seen any references.
Why would all of the freshly minted neutrons collect with protons only
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:18 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Hasn't someone here rebutted the physics of e-c capture?
The rebuttals I've seen involve the p + e- - n + v reaction that is
usually understood to occur between an inner shell electron and a proton in
a nucleus, or of the heavy
If this high school reaction is consistent with the Rossi Reaction; a
proton based reaction, I suspect that Rhenium is the mainline transmutation
product.
Since potassium is the not so secret sauce in this high school reaction, it
lends credence to the speculation that potassium is also the
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
But this statement from Wikipedia could lead one to wonder whether the
cathode (nickel, palladium, tungsten, etc.) is the secret catalyst:
I'm using cathode too broadly here -- I mean the metal substrate within
which
35 matches
Mail list logo
