Hi
Deuterium lamps can ionize air:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_trksid=p5197.m570.l1313_nkw=Deuterium%20arc%20lamp_sacat=0_clu=2_fcid=192_localstpos_stposgbr=1
The special thing with it is that air begins to be ionized
with radiation shorter than 159 nm. So with this lamp you can do special
Another petroleum publication takes note of cold fusion:
http://oilprice.com/Alternative-Energy/Nuclear-Power/Cold-Fusion-Progress-Report.html
Incidentally, this field seems to have a lot people named Brian in it.
- Jed
See:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-18770046
817 images stitched together. Try zooming and panning.
- Jed
Jed, I beg to disagree.
ad (1) 'legitimate earning of money' happens, but is more rare than common, and
more often happens under a pretext of chance than ability.
ad (2) Maybe, at times. But it rarely does. Philantropists are more often wrong
than right when directing of their surplus money.
Eric,
Agree.
There seem to be two types of people:
a) the ones to want to be compensated by money, and translate this to power
b) the ones being humble enough to recognize that they stand on the shoulders
of giants, as maybe Einstein did.
Can you imagine Einstein aspiring being a billionaire?
I
Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com wrote:
b) the ones being humble enough to recognize that they stand on the
shoulders of giants, as maybe Einstein did.
Can you imagine Einstein aspiring being a billionaire?
Einstein was an ambitious young man, looking for main chance in physics.
He
Jojo, by this you imply that the US-Navy is somehow the keeper of wisdom and
knowledge.
As a European I sometimes encounter this US-centric-idea, that some
US-institution has superior knowledge.
Those insaide institutions are mostly stupid buerocrats, which gives the state
a bad name, with
Harry,
I mostly agree,
The general topic is 'power structure research'.
Fascinating.
Domhoff et al in the US, Krysmansky in Germany.
The possible breakup of this structure fascinates a lot of people, including
myself.
Could we heal the environment, before the Utopians and Greedy use LENR as a
Jed,
You are tough and rightly so.
Now Einstein had his peculiarities in his personal live and possibly other
aspects.
Being a womanizer and such, which I personally do not quite find very amusing,
whatever.
But this is not what it is all about.
It is about the peers and the attitude towards
At 04:15 PM 7/3/2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
The error is in the interpretation of the effects. The primary paper is
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SzpakStheeffecto.pdf
Okay, the mystery is probably solved. The effects were probably real
and probably incorrectly ascribed to the high
Pamela Mosier-Boss has pointed out to me that the 6% AC figure was
published in their 2007 EJPAP paper.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/2007/2007BossP-UseOfCR39.pdf
The implications were not explored there.
That paper has more data on the electrolytic current protocol. A
maximum current
Perhaps of interest - a new paper from arxiv.org
Low-energy fusion caused by an interference - B. Ivlev
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.2357.pdf
The author concludes that the probability that two deuterons colliding at
room temperature will fuse is enhanced if their wave functions have proper
forms.
Thank you, Lou, for the interesting links.
Concerning Lewis Larsen's slides, the first twenty or so include abstracts
from recent papers on various topics relating to graphene and carbon
nanotubes. The second paper you mention touches on high magnetic fields
generated in carbon nanotubes (I am
13 matches
Mail list logo
