For those of us who are rational about experimental results, this is bad
news since it is not news that LENR is a real phenomenon -- but large scale
tritium production -- a radioactive product renders the process subject to
government control hence political control.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at
Jones,
Here is the run overnight with the graphite anode replacing the stainless
steel. That temperature jump about half way through seems intriguing.
I've never seen it do that before. It occurred over 90 seconds.
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/6-15-13.png
Best
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Eric, why do you ignore the obvious reaction of D-e-H = tritium? This is
the ONLY reaction consistent with all observations.
It wasn't intentional. I'll take a look at those papers. (The Fusion
Science and Technology
From: Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 6:34:44 AM
Eric, why do you ignore the obvious reaction of D-e-H = tritium? This
is the ONLY reaction consistent with all observations.
That supports your earlier reply to my questions:
H-e-(H-e-H)-e-H-e ==
Reference:
“Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid targets
in heavy water
http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0830
how about the reaction that has been experimentally demonstrated in the
referenced paper?
electron + deuterium+ - dinuetron + neutrino
dineutron -
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Eric, why do you ignore the obvious reaction of D-e-H = tritium? This is
the ONLY reaction consistent with all observations.
Also, just to make sure I understand your position -- you're understanding
is that the lithium
Axil,
I cannot decipher this.
What is the Nanoplasmonic theory of LENR?
Do you refer to high-voltage, super-focused fields between nanoparticles?
If so, what reactions do they cause?
Please explain how *E*e ~ 5-10 eV relates to 'heavy electrons'?
-- Lou Pagnucco
Axil wrote:
This experiment
This bit of information (*E*e ~ 5-10 eV ) shows that energetic electrons
are not involved in the reaction and therefore undercuts the WL theory of
low energy neutron formation.
Do you refer to high-voltage, super-focused fields between nanoparticles?
Anopole magnetic fields produce LENR.
*If
Axil,
You miscalculate.
A single electron in a current of 5 eV electrons can acquire far more
energy than 5 eV via collective effects.
As far as anapoles - Maybe.
But wasn't this just recently (last week) in the physics news?
It's possibly relevant, but I am skeptical.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Axil
One of the features that LENR demonstrates is the stabilization of unstable
radioactive isotopes.
In the referenced paper, the LENR reaction supported by nanoparticles
stabilized tritium. The production of low energy neutrons will not meet
that required functionality that a viable LENR theory
In reply to Jack Cole's message of Sat, 15 Jun 2013 05:52:25 -0500:
Hi,
At 11350 seconds it suddenly flattens off. The curve after the jump appears to
be a continuation of the curve before 11350 seconds. This gives me the
impression that something changed at about 11350 seconds which was
Is there anything different about this setup from prior ones? Is the temp
sensor is a different location, or attached differently? Any code changes,
etc... Think hard about even the smallest change from earlier tests.
-Mark Iverson
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
See this chart:
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/falseahe.jpg
It would be nice to see a control run for comparison.
Eric
Good point Robin.
There could have been accumulating H2/O2 bubble formation that suddenly
recombined (burned) to give the big jump in temperature. Jack has a neat
Android based controller that lets him collect data by cell phone. I think
we will be hearing more on his progress as time goes on.
Mark, the programming is the same as I have been using. The wiring is a
little different as I am running directly from the power supply with this
experiment instead of through the relay bank. The electrodes are placed a
little higher than typical, so the temperature sensor is deeper in the cell
Yes, I will do that after I finish running another experiment tonight.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
See this chart:
16 matches
Mail list logo
