On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:46 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0611167.pdf
I draw your attention, in particular to the equation:
*p* = µ*v* + q*A*
This is old and accepted physics. However, the q*A* term is addition to
Newton's 2nd law, is it not?
Yet another perspective for the same anomalous environment?
http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v112/i3/e030602
The researchers focus on an individual ion in a squeezed state unbalancing
noise along 2 axis. Isn't this what nano geometry accomplishes at a system
level for bulk gas in what we often
You can watch power outages creep up on Atlanta in real time:
http://outagemap.georgiapower.com/external/default.html
How 21st century! I am not sure if this is an advantage or a disadvantage.
People are overreacting, cleaning out grocery stores:
This is an interesting and potentially important article, but to divulge a
bit - nano is not required to exceed Carnot. Probably helps though.
In fact, almost 50 years ago, working for NASA on a project which was
patented and then discontinued (go figure) . Eugene Laumann exceeded the
Carnot
The Georgia Power outage map is interesting. It shows the number of
customers affected increased from 77,132 at 9:45 to 97,450 at 10:15. There
are now 940 outages. Individual outages are not being cleared very quickly.
One at Timberland drive has been listed since this morning. It is affecting
Power still on in North Roswell but branches are starting to fall off pine
trees in my back yard, not a good sign
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The Georgia Power outage map is interesting. It shows the number of
customers affected increased from
The suggestion that they had exceeded Carnot likely prevented most of the
physicists from accepting the data. After observing their reaction to LENR, it
is not surprising to find that effects that operate outside of the current
theories are completely ignored.
At least you can operate that
Stay warm Jed and others around that region. At least we have just plain old
fashioned snow in our forcast, although a lot of it.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Feb 12, 2014 10:45 am
Subject: Re:
As a consequence of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, nano cavities and
EMF squeezing go together. When the location of particles is tightly
confined, its momentum gets very large. This goes for both electrons and
photons confined in a nano-sized optical cavity (AKA NAE). The energy and
mass
One bottleneck in power line restoration is the lack of tree surgeons to
remove the widow makers that overhang the downed power lines. Line crews
like to see the tree removed before they tackle the repair of the power
line.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Jed Rothwell
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle will not be consistent with and not
support the laws of thermodynamics.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
As a consequence of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, nano cavities
and EMF squeezing go together. When the
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
One bottleneck in power line restoration is the lack of tree surgeons to
remove the widow makers that overhang the downed power lines.
Georgia Power brought in hundreds of out-of-state tree removal crews, as
well as power company repair crews. So that
--
VERTICAL TURBINES, PACKED TIGHT, BOOST POWER
http://www.earthtechling.com/2011/07/vertical-turbines-packed-tight-boost-power/
--
The caveat is that high wind speed is still a problem for all egg beaters.
Harry
Claims of fusion by laser with more output energy than input energy
for the first time.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/the-lasers-fuelling-hopes-of-unlimited-clean-nuclear-energy-9124237.html
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/13
That's a lot of caveats. The energy used to power up and fire is hundreds
of thosands greater. Probably many more caveats.
2014-02-12 16:54 GMT-02:00 Brad Lowe ecatbuil...@gmail.com:
Claims of fusion by laser with more output energy than input energy
for the first time.
for less than a billionth of a second
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
That's a lot of caveats. The energy used to power up and fire is hundreds
of thosands greater. Probably many more caveats.
2014-02-12 16:54 GMT-02:00 Brad Lowe
Jed, you probably know that to fix a line the power to the entire line has to
be turned off. That would turn off power to many more people than initially.
Ed Storms
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 12, 2014, at 8:44 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The Georgia Power outage map is
Blaze Spinnaker,
for less than a billionth of a second
And people complain about calorimetry in LENR
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Jed, you probably know that to fix a line the power to the entire line has
to be turned off. That would turn off power to many more people than
initially.
Yes. You can watch the area affected grow and then shrink as they fix the
problem. Select zoom
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:48:38 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
As a consequence of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, nano cavities and
EMF squeezing go together. When the location of particles is tightly
confined, its momentum gets very large. This goes for both electrons and
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:02:46 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
This is an interesting and potentially important article, but to divulge a
bit - nano is not required to exceed Carnot. Probably helps though.
In fact, almost 50 years ago, working for NASA on a project which was
As a skeptic I demand that another independent group of scientists replicate
the results. How do we know that the input power required to run the lasers
is accurately measured? The list of possible errors is a mile long for an
experiment this complicated.
Why do the physicists accept this
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:46:54 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
For an electron, you get 0.152 eV. This represents an increase in the mass of
the electron by 0.3%.
Oops. That was overestimated by a factor of 4.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sun, 2 Feb 2014 09:39:57 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
The most elegant answer begins with the obvious assertion that there are no
gammas ab initio, which means that no reaction of the kind which your theory
proposes can be valid because gammas are expected.
Actually
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
The most elegant answer begins with the obvious assertion that there are no
gammas ab initio, which means that no reaction of the kind which your theory
proposes can be valid because gammas are expected.
Actually not only would I not expect
I agree—the closed system did not change its angular Momentum. In a losed
system AM is conserved—this applies to QM systems.
From: David Roberson
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 7:59 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy and momentum / was RAR
I do not see where we differ in
To my best knowledge, that is not how it works.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_dot
A quantum dot is like an atom with an unlimited number of electron orbitals.
As new electrons enter the dot, the electron takes on the next available
higher energy level.
More energy is required to push
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
The most elegant answer begins with the obvious assertion that there are
no
gammas ab initio, which means that no reaction of the kind which your
theory
proposes
Abraham Lincoln and Charles Darwin were both born on February 12, 1809.
- Jed
Blows against slavery of the body and of the mind.
Unfortunately enslaving entire States, terminating the Laboratory of the
States, was another legacy, perhaps not of Lincoln per se, but certainly of
the Federal government that arose in the aftermath of his prematurely
terminated life.
Darwin
I stand corrected. Dr. Yeong E. has proposed a double deuteron pair as the
boson component of his Bose Einstein condensate theory for many years.
The ion member of the hydrogen dipole will be a deuteron so a cluster
fusion reaction consistent with Kim would include those neutrons in that
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
As a skeptic I demand that another independent group of scientists
replicate the results. How do we know that the input power required to
run the lasers is accurately measured? The list of possible errors is a
mile
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Karpen's_Pile_--_A_Battery_That_Has_Produced_Energy_Continuously_Since_1950s
Karpen's pile
This device has all the earmarks of a nanoplasmonic system almost identical
in concept if not structure to Piantelli's reactor.
A highly pitted platinum surface is
Is the expression beyond the carnot limit the genteel way of stating a
violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics?
Harry
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Yet another perspective for the same anomalous environment?
More info
http://www.rexresearch.com/karpen/karpen.htm
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Karpen's_Pile_--_A_Battery_That_Has_Produced_Energy_Continuously_Since_1950s
Karpen's pile
This device has all the earmarks
Correct me if I'm wrong but they didn't really achieve OU because the
target only got 10% of the incident energy so the actual energy gain was in
a subsystem rather than in the whole system.
[m]
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at
I like your humor Eric.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Feb 12, 2014 9:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot fusion OU milestone reported
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
As
Eric get a kick out of the unintentional errors that I make and he tries to
duplicate the dead pan humor intentionally.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:57 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I like your humor Eric.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
Axil,
An interesting find. I have never heard of it before.
Why not ask Peter Gluck his opinion on it?
I believe he is in Romania, and may have seen the device.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Axil wrote:
If I were and experimentalist to save some money on precious material, I
would try to duplicate this by using Nickel and hydrofluoric acid
(dielectric constant - 100),
One electrode would be highly pitted as in Celani's wire. All the copper
must be complexly removed however. The other would be
Cold Fusion is a fraud, a lie.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3122281/posts?page=22
To: *Kevmo*
Cold fusion is a lie. It doesn't exist anywhere in the universe aside from
the fevered imaginations of the scammers and those duped into believing it.
14
The creation of charge? The creation of electrons?
Any FE device that does this is wasting energy by manifesting matter.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There's an interesting discussion of the role of the statistical p-value in
science in a recent article published online at Nature:
For all the P value's apparent precision, Fisher intended it to be just one
part of a fluid, non-numerical process that blended data and background
knowledge to
I wrote:
There's an interesting discussion of the role of the statistical p-value in
science in a recent article published online at Nature ...
Here is a the link to the article:
http://www.nature.com/news/scientific-method-statistical-errors-1.14700
Eric
- What causes the anomalous excess heat? An
hypothesis.http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3122363/posts
- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3122363/posts
- Wed 12 Feb 2014 10:12:04 PM PST · 26 of
26http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3122363/posts?page=26#26
Kevmo
The same charge creation process holds for the Papp engine. Charge increase
was used to feed the capacitive spark discharge of the opposing
cylinder. Smart engineering can use this seemingly wasteful feature
to full advantage just as Joe Papp did.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:49 PM, John Berry
However efficient you are at utilizing electrons, it comes no where close
to the energy of annihilating them.
But maybe the electrons were already existed and simply are being
collected/transferred.
Patrick Flanagan patented an ionizer that consists of 2 circular plates
feed AC, the rate at
47 matches
Mail list logo
