Hi,
Just a thought related to the string theory and the Big Bang inflation
theory.
Could it be that Branes are the macro version, while LENR is the micro
version of the same principle?
Kind regards,
Rob
That would be my guess. The vacuum is full of branes of all varying energy
levels. They are all decaying at varying rates and form and are connected
by strings. Hydrogen appears pop in/pop out and string together
I think we live on a Brane (6-D core of the Earth) and are immersed in this
Jones,
Where did you get the idea one warhead went missing?
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_United_States_Air_Force_nuclear_weapons_incident
While I appreciate the creativity of the suggestion, I think linking any
physical phenomenon to string/brain/M-theory is something of a fools
errand. Anything that requires the anthropic principal to justify its
existence is no longer a viable scientific theory. It has basically
declared a end to
Axil, Langmuir was aware of this anomaly and advised not to pursue it when he
developed atomic welding with tungsten electrodes.. some will insist it is the
energy of recombination but if so then welding would not be a constant flow and
one would have to continually stop, build up a reservoir
I have lots of optical evidence from my research of strings of vacuum in
our atmosphere.
I have lots of anomalous doppler readings triggered by vacuum in our
atmosphere
Our low pressure weather disturbances, such as super cells and
mesovotex's are just decaying branes of vacuum, broken off from
In HHO welding, there is no electric current employed. HHO welding is just
the burning of hydrogen in oxygen.
But how does a hydrogen combustion process that produces only 2,660 °C in
heat vaporize tungsten at (5930 °C, 10706 °F).
This does not add up unless there is LENR involved.
On Tue,
From: a.ashfield
Where did you get the idea one warhead went missing? See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_United_States_Air_Force_nuclear_weapons_in
cident
First, this is not exactly mine - or anyone else's idea since in fact, it
was initially
Axil,
I admit total ignorance of the HHO theory.
I have heard about people saying they can reduce gas consumption in autos.
It has never taken any commercial format.
I have a few questions though:
1. If HHO produce this high temperature, then it sounds to me to be logical
that it saves gas in an
Confusion seems to exist between energy and temperature. A very high
temperature can be produced using very little energy if the energy is highly
concentrated. This is done regularly using lasers and electric arcs. In the
case of HHO, the chemical energy released when H2O forms is applied
I don't think the tungsten is vaporizing - at least there's no evidence
that supports that contention. In the example video, the surface of the
rod appears to be melted, so the flame must be at least 3500 C, higher
than produced by H2+O combustion. There's enough velocity in the flame
to blow
The confusion between incommensurable quantities is excusable in someone
who doesn't know the first thing about physics but not even in a blue
collar technician that works on household utilities like electrical wiring
or heating and air conditioning.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Edmund
Ok James I admit my ignorance, although I am not a blue collar worker in
the AC field. I also admit my English is less than perfect. I do not know
what you mean with incommensurable quantities. Are you just supporting Ed
Storms statements about quantities and temperature? I did understand that,
it
What causes HHO explosive/implosive reaction is the same mechanism the
makes the Papp engine function. In fact, Papp's first patent for his engine
was a closed HHO engine, where water never exited the piston. What is
commonly understood today as a HHO engine is an open engine design, where
water
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_commensurability#Commensurability
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.comwrote:
Ok James I admit my ignorance, although I am not a blue collar worker in
the AC field. I also admit my English is less than perfect. I do not know
Background on the Minot incident:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=vaaid=7158
The conspiracy then:
http://projectcamelot.org/jack_carter.html
2014-03-18 13:54 GMT-04:00 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com:
Background on the Minot incident:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=vaaid=7158
Thanks James,
I can use the thesaurus if the word was hard. I could not understand the
way you used it.
I think the quantities are comparable. They can be measured in any pressure
r volume dimension as far as I am concerned.
What I did not understand was what you are comparing. I did not mean to
Is it possible that some of the tungsten is burning instead of melting? A
cutting torch actually burns the steel by adding excess oxygen to the region.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Mar 18, 2014 11:40 am
That is right, Dave. Tungsten oxide is volatile and will vaporize at much lower
temperatures than pure tungsten, which makes tungsten look as if it is
valorizing.
In addition, the quoted max. temperature for H2-O2 combustion is for the
temperature of the flame. This is not the maximum
Lennart, my comment wasn't directed at you but at Axil's question: Do I
need to spell this out any further? After giving temperature numbers as
though they represented energy or power. I tend to dismiss Axil's
asserted-as-fact speculations posing as theory, if for no other reason than
their tone
James
Ok I am not so sensitive so it is OK- but felt uncalled for as I preempted
my weakness:)
Hard to follow if you do not say to whom.
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650
Well there have been other recent examples from very authoritative
sources:
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg88835.html
So I felt a general comment was in order.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.comwrote:
James
Ok I am not so sensitive so
Here is an ORNL report from 1952 about heat released by HHO through a
catalytic converter:
http://web.ornl.gov/info/reports/1952/3445603529607.pdf
Title is: The Reaction Between Hydrogen and Oxygen by Catalysis and
the Thermal Reaction
- Brad
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:50 PM, James Bowery
The missing cruise missile had a W80 warhead with a dialable yield of
5 to 150 kt. You can do a lot of damage to NYC with that yield. But
detonate it at 40,000 ft over the NE corridor and you fry every
semiconductor from DC to NYC. Suddenly only China and Russia are
Superpowers.
You would need
April surprise?
http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin98.htm
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
The missing cruise missile had a W80 warhead with a dialable yield of
5 to 150 kt. You can do a lot of damage to NYC with that yield. But
detonate it
26 matches
Mail list logo
