http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1202/1202.6603.pdf
*Ultra-Thin Metal Films for Enhanced Solar Absorption*
To optimize photonic responsiveness, one of the reasons that nickel is a
great LENR material is that it is an ideal reflector of light, specifically
infrared light.
Furthermore, the
Poser of the Day ...
Cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation is almost universally assumed to
be the photon remnants which are left over from the Big Bang of cosmology.
That assumption has more holes than Swiss cheese. Compounding one error in
another is the best that can be said for it.
Jones,
I think you are right and it is also responsible for a part of the normal
background radiation here on Earth, which increases slightly during many
storms, many of which I think are caused by an increase in local vacuum
energy and not just hot and cold. We were born into a world where space
This is one of the main reasons for the theory of inflation.
2014-04-28 11:08 GMT-03:00 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net:
we should detect a fairly uniform relic
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
That's right. I think our weather contains decaying strings of vacuum in
the jetstreams attached to our earth d-brane, which inflate into
supercells (closed strings) of decaying vacuum which ionize and condense
everything and produce water vapor and precipitation. The vacuum streams to
Earth in
Axil--
You do not mean to coat the surface of the Ni nano particles themselves do you?
It seems only the inner surface of the reactor vessel which is a small
pressure vessel, rather than the nano particles should be coated.However,
it may be desirable to transmit the infrared across the
Jones--
The link you noted for the Finders University discusses process physics,
but I did not see anything about the microwave background radiation coming
from a Dirac sea. Is there a separate paper that is more explicit?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
This is the US Patent of the same name:
http://www.google.com/patents/US20140098917
Publication numberUS20140098917 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 14/113,638
PCT numberPCT/IB2012/052100
Publication dateApr 10, 2014
Filing dateApr 26, 2012
Priority dateApr 26, 2011
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
The link you noted for the Finders University discusses process physics,
but I did not see anything about the microwave background radiation coming
from a Dirac sea. Is there a separate paper that is more explicit?
I have confused notes on the
Here is a paper which assumes the temperature of thermal
motion of Dirac sea equal the temperature of Cosmological Microwave
Background... if there is a valid mathematical connection, then at least the
prima facie case has been made.
-Original Message-
From: Brad Lowe
I will add this one to my LENR patent database at
http://www.fusioncatalyst.org/fusion-base/fusion-patents/
This link appears to be down...
A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for the CMB.
Dark matter is assumed to be distributed throughout the universe and is
supposed to clump together around galaxy centers and other large massive
objects. I have long wondered how this congregation of material
From: David Roberson
A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for the
CMB. Dark matter is assumed to be distributed throughout the universe and
is supposed to clump together around galaxy centers and other large massive
objects. I have long wondered how this
http://m.phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illusion-quantum-vacuum.html
On Monday, April 28, 2014, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* David Roberson
A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for the
CMB. Dark matter is assumed to be distributed throughout
Good question. If dark matter and dark energy exist then they must have
consequences. The researchers may have been looking in the wrong places thus
far.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Apr 28, 2014
Taking all of this together, there seems to exist a prima facie case for this
premise:
1)Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an illusion
in 3-space except for gravitational effects
2)The quantum vacuum = Dirac sea = dark matter
3)CMB is not a relic of a
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/nov/17/how-to-turn-darkness-into-light
Photons are formed from the vacuum as a part of the virtual particle
formation process. But do photons give up vacuum energy if they
annihilate with their antiparticle? Does the photon have an
Could the dirac sea also explain the observed red shift?
Harry
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Taking all of this together, there seems to exist a prima facie case for
this premise:
1)Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is
1)Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an
illusion in 3-space except for gravitational effects
In addition to gravitational effects I think it is electromagnetic (think
magnetosphere) and weakly ionizing/decaying 3-space (think ionosphere) and
electromagnetic/lightning
Here is another interesting question to ponder. If dark matter interacts with
other dark matter, is that the source of dark energy? This thought is along
the lines of: Conservation of Dark Matter and Energy. E=M*c*c where the M is
dark matter and E is dark energy.
If, as we appear to be
Dark energy is likely the source of the force which drives stars apart.
Yeah, that is how it was determined to exist in the first place. Now I wonder
if the actual process leading to the force that drives the stars apart is CMB
radiation? The thought is that CMB exists throughout the universe and is
approximately equal in all directions of propagation. It is
I kinda thought it is converting baryonic matter in space back to
dark/vacuum constantly. Ionize, condense and collapse back into vacuum
On Monday, April 28, 2014, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Yeah, that is how it was determined to exist in the first place. Now I
wonder if the
Axil--
The article cited below has the following explanation of the Casmir effect in a
static situation of two mirrors:
This attractive force is caused by the radiation pressure exerted by
virtual photons outside the mirrors and the fact that this pressure exceeds
the pressure between the
That's easy!
;-)
Reduce the turbulence in the stream, which for the Dirac Sea, means
using an intense electric or magnetic field to polarize the vacuum...
-mark iverson
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Taking all of this together, there seems to exist a prima facie
An invisible, ancient source of energy surrounds us—energy that powered the
first explorations of the world, and that may be a key to the future...
http://hint.fm/wind/
It is our quantum vacuum/dirac sea powering that wind...
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:29 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for the
CMB.
Another thought -- we assume that because conservation of energy is borne
out experimentally on the local scale that it also applies to the
27 matches
Mail list logo
