My dear Friends,
I am asking you a huge favor;
PLEASE disseminate and promote at a distance of least 6 circles
intersecting with your personal Circle this:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/stop-probletence-pandemic.html
Special request to those of yours who Have newsletters or Blogs _ I
I read the report you linked to. Their main argument is that CCDs
response at the temperature the ecat is operating at has a low
reaction curve, i.e. the reaction to temperature change flattens out
so it's harder to get an accurate reading with a change in
temperature. The method that
As to whether a spot pyrometer is more accurate than an IR camera, I
think depends on their use. For small area or pin point measurement I
agree that a spot pyrometer may be more accurate, but for large or
gross measurement I think the IR camera would be just as accurate if
not more so. I
Bob,
The overwhelming probability is that the Levi sample was salted - which is
to say that it was compromised by the addition of a pure isotope. Show me
one US nuclear physicist who would believe otherwise - and fully back Rossi
on the issue of in situ manufacture of pure (99.3%) Ni62.
I'm
Use both as a cross check.
harry
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Robert Dorr rod...@comcast.net wrote:
As to whether a spot pyrometer is more accurate than an IR camera, I think
depends on their use. For small area or pin point measurement I agree that
a spot pyrometer may be more
Vorticians.
We have played the deconstructing Rossi game before on vortex - which is
to say, trying to look for hidden motives - which could have been there all
along, but the overall scenario has been intentionally clouded by conduct
which is puzzling at best, and self-destructive at worst.
This conjecture aligns with Occham's Razor. If it's true, Rossi has
painted himself into a corner. The only real value of the TIP report
is its use towards gaining a patent. I have no doubt that the patent
examiners would demand to do their own isotope testing, and it would
either blow Rossi
Hi Jones,
As always, I have learned to appreciate the creativeness of your conjecture.
I have to admit, some of your speculation actually comes across to me as
plausible... in a fashion.
I noticed you came up with 12 deconstructions. Personally, I think that's
an awful lot of conjecture
Your theory kind of relies on Levi and Crew being frauds and liars...
Because Rossi wouldn't trust them to be incompetent.
Conspiracies of that nature just don't work except in the minds of nutjobs.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Vorticians…
We
That being said, I do believe Rossi might have messed with the fuel or the
extraction of the fuel in some way to mis direct, so if you want to
re-write your analysis to hold for that, I'd be cool with it. I just
won't accept that the scientists purposely lied.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 7:33 PM,
The total instantaneous power into the system can be calculated by taking the
instantaneous source voltage and multiplying it by the instantaneous source
current. It does not matter whether you want to call it AC or DC since this is
the total that is being delivered. There is no more,
Occam's Razor is a tool used by enfeebled minds to construct paper houses out
of tree bark shavings.
Real thinkers use chain saws and portable lumber mills to build their houses.
-Bob
-Original Message-
From: Kevin O'Malley [mailto:kevmol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 26,
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Robert Ellefson vortex-h...@e2ke.com
wrote:
Occam's Razor is a tool used by enfeebled minds to construct paper houses
out of tree bark shavings.
Real thinkers use chain saws and portable lumber mills to build their
houses.
Bayes' theorem and plain old
The actual measurement that I am interesting in is the amount of power being
radiated and convected away from the device. If the effective temperature can
be manipulated by some process that results in less than expected power
emission, then we are being fooled. That is the root of my
14 matches
Mail list logo
