Hi Lane. It's good to see you are still kicking. I have not done much since
the publication of my book.
Occasionally I update it, but I consider my work to be done. For sure, there
is no money in it.
Even with the help of your web page, that attracted thousands of viewers, I
still did not
Nice work Jeff,
You have made Mills more accessible, but I’m not sure he would agree with
everything that you have done here, due to the implications. This is also very
similar to what Michaud is showing – with the huge emphasis on 511 keV value,
which permeates the entire field of LENR…
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Nice work Jeff,
You have made Mills more accessible, but I’m not sure he would agree with
everything that you have done here, due to the implications. This is also
very similar to what Michaud is showing – with the
Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
I am not sure how Mizuno measured the 10.8 Watts of power used by the pump.
It says in the report: Mizuno used the WattChecker watt meter to measure
the electric power consumed by the pump, which is 10.8 W.
I think the pump specifications indicate
I have not followed this debate closely, but I assume Jed is correct.
So Dave, how do you address this statement:
The steady state baseline includes the heat from the pump, any diversion
from the baseline indicates excess heat.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com
Gigi, were you part of Defkalion Europe?
2015-01-12 18:52 GMT-02:00 Jeff Driscoll jef...@gmail.com:
I have not followed this debate closely, but I assume Jed is correct.
So Dave, how do you address this statement:
The steady state baseline includes the heat from the pump, any diversion
Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
The major result is that we measured 43°C in the pump body very close to
the water so it is really easy to understand that, despite what Jed says,
the pump motor delivers a lot of heat to the water . . .
You are wrong. This is not what I say. This is
Dave,
as promised and while you still insist saying that we were deeply wrong, we
have put on-line two different updates
1)
https://gsvit.wordpress.com/2015/01/12/further-measurements-on-the-md-6k-n-pump-used-by-tadahiko-mizuno/
2)
From: Jeff Driscoll
Ø I wouldn't focus too much on the TSO being the end point of shrinkage -
it's more the birth of the electron in pair production. All the GUTCP rules
or postulates produce nice clean equations that show the TSO being the birth…
Well – if you want to believe that
Jed is correct, when the pump is turned on and everything reaches steady
state, (using his example) the pump is putting in 4 watts of power to the
tubing, the reservoir and the LENR chamber and all these tubes and the LENR
chamber emit 4 watts of thermal power to the ambient at steady state. Then
http://www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnology-news/newsid=38660.php
Dear Giancarlo,
Thanks for publishing your report in English so that many of us that do not
speak Italian can understand it. There is no disagreement between the method
that I used to calculate the kinetic transport power and what you would have
calculated with the same numbers since we used
Jeff,
I could agree entirely with you. I've have some problems with the internal
and external calorimeter time constants that are too short. But let's go on
and assume that what you say is completely right.
Now can you tell me where in the Mizuno's results (excel files and figures)
you see this
Dave,
you said nothing about simulations that should be a confirmation of our
experiments. But I think that we can do something more: what will convince
you that we are right and Mizuno is wrong?
Regards
2015-01-12 23:17 GMT+01:00 David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com:
Dear Giancarlo,
Thanks
Ill have to leave that to you and others,
I assumed Jed was making a point that Dave didn't understand.
I don't know the details of Mizuno's experiment.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Gigi DiMarco gdmgdms...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff,
I could agree entirely with you. I've have some problems
No, never.
I'm only an amateur that follows LENR from the outside.
My job is different: I run a company working in the railway field (power
converters): nothing to do with LENR.
2015-01-12 22:02 GMT+01:00 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com:
Gigi, were you part of Defkalion Europe?
2015-01-12
Jed,
I think you did not catch the importance of time constants in your
calorimeter.
I do not know how to explain it in more details. You will continue to say
no forever.
Do you think that simulation are a valid tools as far as they reproduce
exactly the experiments?
2015-01-12 22:10 GMT+01:00
I agree completely with Jed as long as the ambient is kept at a constant
temperature. Any constant source of power introduced into the system will
eventually result in a fixed delta between the device coolant temperature and
the ambient. The time constant associated with the transient delta
It appears as if Jed and Mizuno have the situation under control. I will be
relieved when the variations in ambient are taken out of the picture since that
will make analysis of the system much simpler.
You might be correct that I got the direction of the pseudo input wrong. It is
so easy to
I missed the simulation for some reason. Where can I find that? Sorry if I
overlooked it.
Do you have data that shows the mass flow rate when a 10 mm tube is attached to
the pump output? I assume that a large pipe is on the suction port.
You need to attach a full length 10 mm tube to the
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I agree completely with Jed as long as the ambient is kept at a constant
temperature.
When ambient changes a great deal over a short time, calorimetry becomes
too complicated. You need to throw away those results. Or use them for a
limited purpose.
Nice pictures!
With data fitted theory you still can make predictions when you
interpolate, I use it all the time. No need to throw away anything. But it
is
dishonest of society to ignore Mills, as I pointed out there is nothing
written that are pointing towards an error e.g. ed. 2014 page 12
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep, this is exactly the problem, you have two incomplete models that same
the same thing. It's a mystery ...
Allow me to point to some additional, beautiful images of excited Rydberg
states that one will
Bob,
You have uncovered a pump specification that proves that the replication work
by Gigi and allies is not accurate. They report to have determined that
approximately 4.5 watts of thermal power is being absorbed by the circulating
water under their test condition. This amount of reported
Axil,
Some of the best evidence for Mill's hydrinos come form his plasma
experiments...no condensed matter involved.
Ron
--On Sunday, January 11, 2015 11:38 AM -0500 Axil Axil
janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The lack of proof that anti-hydrinos exist tells me that the hydrino is
not a
Jed--
I have researched the pump characteristics further and find that this pump has
a low efficiency and would use at most about 3 watts of power in heating the
circulating water. This is consistent with what you have stated.
I am not sure how Mizuno measured the 10.8 Watts of power used
*LENR is topological in nature. The size and shape of its components are as
important as the kinds of material that supports it. The greater the
conformance to LENR's ideal topological configuration, the greater will be
LENR's productivity.*
*Nickel is the best metal to use for the Ni/H reactor
Just a bit unfinished- we have guests for dinner.
If something important happens (I wait it) I'll
come back later, See please:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/01/lenr-info-january-12-2015.html
Best wishes,
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
28 matches
Mail list logo
